Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ㅤ⃜ 𐌄Ҟ.

Channel

ㅤ⃜ 𐌄Ҟ.

@klartraumen

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

224subscribers

+63 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003925264194
TypeChannel
Username@klartraumen
Created19 June 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/klartraumen

Growth

161224192.58 August 2026 — 161 subscribers8 August 2026 — 161 subscribers17 August 2026 — 165 subscribers24 August 2026 — 170 subscribers30 August 2026 — 193 subscribers8 September 2026 — 194 subscribers17 September 2026 — 224 subscribers8 August 202617 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 40 days, net +63. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 152–233 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 06:00224+30
8 Sept 2026, 12:18194+1
30 Aug 2026, 19:13193+23
24 Aug 2026, 05:53170+5
17 Aug 2026, 11:38165+4
8 Aug 2026, 17:15161no change
8 Aug 2026, 16:01161first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 19 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,018 reactions across 5 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 9.14% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5310300962093572369939.14%
custom 5309926329276210413868.45%
custom 5310076090490856233868.45%
custom 5431564742311323803848.25%
custom 5431542412776351308797.76%
custom 5431830914319556579797.76%
custom 5310242606372921452615.99%
custom 5312245783414744883605.89%
custom 5316965965357949054605.89%
custom 5310210630341401559595.80%
custom 5314426492929744813595.80%
custom 5316616226171035926555.40%
custom 5449879517948587472555.40%
custom 5447260348107235581515.01%
custom 5449725539076055674515.01%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,018 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
350
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 15 we hold a reading for · 33%
Most on one post
160
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @klartraumen. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 June 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 19:12 UTC262 views157 reactions35 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

亲近.‌‌ ‌ ‌🪦🪦‌ ‌wïe siehst du das . . . ‌какой акт связи ċ животными ‌лучше всего отражает мöю суть?

custom 544987951794858747255custom 544726034810723558151custom 544972553907605567451

30 Jul 2026, 19:15 UTC780 views242 reactions30 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

‌ ‌ ‌er eilt dem licht entgegen‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌vergisst die sicherheit ﹝ 𓐩 ﹞‌‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌vergisst die selbsterhaltung.‌ ‌ ‌

custom 543156474231132380384custom 543154241277635130879custom 543183091431955657979

22 Jul 2026, 10:22 UTC832 views179 reactions25 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

‌ ‌ 🎱‌ ‌ ‌†̷̷̷̡̨̦͙̰̠̺͇͎̘̼̩͉͇͑̎̾̓ͦ̏͐̅ͭͭͣ͒͌̒̕͢ен͍̈́̓ͤь̢̛͆̐͂́ всегд‌а нас†иґае‡ с‌вет.

custom 531024260637292145261custom 531021063034140155959custom 531442649292974481359

5 Jul 2026, 19:17 UTC≈1,110 views175 reactions100 Starsread 8 August 2026

сегодня я‌ услышал‌а ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌𓁹‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌⌠ 嘘の上塗り‌⌡ uso no uwаnuri или наслоение лжи. там, в японском языке это звучит так изысканно, так чисто. но в моей голове это звучит иначе, как приговор. это не просто ѳбман. э‌то искусство соκрытия истины. это когда ты берешь ложь, превращаешь её в фундамент, а затем покрываешь еще более совершенным вымыслом, пока реальность не станет похожа на труп, тщательно загримированный

custom 531224578341474488360custom 531696596535794905460custom 531661622617103592655

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @klartraumen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ㅤ⃜ 𐌄Ҟ.” (@klartraumen), 224 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/klartraumen.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.