快完成了
👍48👎11🖕6❤2💩2
Signed 酷览

Channel
@klzzgf
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
50,725subscribers
-456 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002267468848 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @klzzgf |
| Description | 唯一的官方频道 其余频道均为代理频道 频道主: @kulanNB 交流群: https://t.me/klzzjlq 搜索群: https://t.me/KLZZJL 反馈频道: https://t.me/KLZZFK 安装包频道: https://t.me/klmodapk |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 19 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/klzzgf |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026, 18:17 | 50,725 | -47 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 08:46 | 50,772 | -99 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 09:44 | 50,871 | -43 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:19 | 50,914 | -51 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:44 | 50,965 | -76 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:47 | 51,041 | -33 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 51,074 | -83 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:54 | 51,157 | -16 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 08:29 | 51,173 | -26 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:07 | 51,199 | -27 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:03 | 51,226 | -51 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 09:27 | 51,277 | +101 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 02:28 | 51,176 | +7 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 03:52 | 51,169 | -12 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:15 | 51,181 | no change |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:00 | 51,181 | first reading |
41 posts held, back to 12 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 41 (12 August 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 275,501 |
| Reactions total | 8,947 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Sept 2026, 06:44 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
8,947 reactions across 41 posts, in 40 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2,822 | 31.5% | |
| 🕊 | 2,099 | 23.5% | |
| 😡 | 838 | 9.37% | |
| 🤓 | 752 | 8.41% | |
| 👎 | 575 | 6.43% | |
| 😭 | 560 | 6.26% | |
| 🤬 | 389 | 4.35% | |
| 🖕 | 209 | 2.34% | |
| ❤ | 168 | 1.88% | |
| 🤣 | 78 | 0.872% | |
| 💩 | 63 | 0.704% | |
| 🤔 | 57 | 0.637% | |
| 😱 | 41 | 0.458% | |
| 🔥 | 39 | 0.436% | |
| 😍 | 37 | 0.414% | |
| 🤮 | 36 | 0.402% | |
| 👏 | 24 | 0.268% | |
| 😁 | 22 | 0.246% | |
| 🤪 | 19 | 0.212% | |
| 🤨 | 18 | 0.201% | |
| 20 further kinds | 101 | 1.13% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,947 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 12 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
快完成了
👍48👎11🖕6❤2💩2
Signed 酷览
⭐KL自 营 八 级 号 卡 网 https://kulan.sfdcvsd.xyz/ 【专属客服 详细教程 质量保障】 地铁8级仅1.8元 还有和平账号 重要通知: ①手续费降低 ②存款升级
👍7❤1
Signed 酷览
可爱的学生🥚要离开了
😭336👍61🤣29🕊24🖕14💩6🤬6✍3
Signed 酷览
手瓦只是拓展项目 PUBG下个赛季底包检测低一点或者有进展还是会继续做的
👍144🖕23🕊11👎10🥰7🤩3❤1🔥1
Signed 酷览
进攻手瓦搞直装怎么样? 赞成🤓 反对👎
👎396🤓265👍70🕊7🤣4❤1🖕1😍1
Signed 酷览
有多少人玩手瓦 (手机无畏契约) 玩的扣🤓表情我看看
🤓481👍50😡34🕊26👎21🤮15🖕12❤5
Signed 酷览
很抱歉各位 等待我们这么长时间只更新了注入 一体和容器我们也尝试了不管怎么调整都没办法绕开一体底包检测 容器上了新校验 所以我们就取消了一体和容器 赛季也没多长时间了 如果下赛季还是这样的话我们可能就要考虑转行其他游戏了🙏
👍130😭102🖕58🕊22🤣10😍7🫡6😨6
Signed 酷览
📢KL直装 V9.0 已发布 🐲增强稳定性 🐲增加UI动画 🐲增加同行显示 🐲更换绘制方式 🐲优化自瞄算法 🐲删除大多数功能 💎免费卡密:klzzgf 🛡KL 官 方 主 自 营 八 级 号 https://kulan.sfdcvsd.xyz/ 🌐 下载:@KLMODAPK 🐱 反馈:@KLZZFK_BOT
👍64❤19🕊11🖕9😍6🌭3🤗2
Signed 酷览
先发布注入了 注入都搞好不知道多长时间了 一直因为直装没搞好所以不发 觉得可以的扣👍表情
👍103😡29🕊24💩10🖕6❤3🥰3😍2
Signed 酷览
我承认这次更新很鸽但我们真的每天都在测试 前天已经把稳定性完善了但现在对于无root用户闪退挺难解决
🕊199👍60🤮16🤔9💩8🖕7😘6🤷♂4
Signed 酷览
KL 你还能绷住吗
🕊229👍172🤬89🖕21🤔17🤨13💩10🤣8
Signed 淋濑
具体更新时间等待通知
🕊214🤬51👍44😱8🖕7👻3🤔3❤2
Signed 酷览
Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @klzzgf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“KL公益直装官方” (@klzzgf), 50,725 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/klzzgf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.