שבת שלום🙏🏼

Channel
ערוץ כנסת 99
@knessettv
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry
8,434subscribers
-54 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001248845442 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @knessettv |
| Description | כל מה שקורה בכנסת - במקום אחד אנחנו גם בטוויטר - @KnessetT בפייסבוק - @KnessetTv באינסטגרם - @knessetTv בטיקטוק - @KnessetTv ביוטיוב - @knessettv |
| Created | 23 January 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 24 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/knessettv |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 04:36 | 8,434 | +4 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 07:47 | 8,430 | -7 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 13:36 | 8,437 | +35 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 03:56 | 8,402 | +5 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 07:20 | 8,397 | -3 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 08:05 | 8,400 | -7 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 00:25 | 8,407 | -1 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 03:16 | 8,408 | -1 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 19:38 | 8,409 | -9 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 10:15 | 8,418 | -4 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 09:56 | 8,422 | -12 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 23:18 | 8,434 | -4 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 11:57 | 8,438 | -5 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 19:16 | 8,443 | -15 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 17:41 | 8,458 | +3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:35 | 8,455 | -8 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 8,463 | -2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 07:12 | 8,465 | -8 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 14:05 | 8,473 | -7 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:57 | 8,480 | first reading |
Engagement
105 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 7.53%
- avg views ÷ 8,434 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 635
- 36 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.12%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 36
- of 105 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 25 of 36 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 105 (2 August 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 22,859 |
| Reactions total | 160 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 11:07 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈812
- Videos
- ≈50,500
- Links
- ≈2,500
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1h 50m
- Average length
- 1m 50s
Measured directly from 60 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
443 reactions across 74 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤮 | 101 | 22.8% | |
| 🤡 | 95 | 21.4% | |
| 👍 | 61 | 13.8% | |
| ❤ | 40 | 9.03% | |
| 👎 | 27 | 6.09% | |
| 🥱 | 22 | 4.97% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 2.93% | |
| 😁 | 13 | 2.93% | |
| 👏 | 10 | 2.26% | |
| 💯 | 10 | 2.26% | |
| 🤬 | 9 | 2.03% | |
| 😡 | 7 | 1.58% | |
| 🤣 | 6 | 1.35% | |
| 🥴 | 6 | 1.35% | |
| 🤯 | 5 | 1.13% | |
| 😭 | 4 | 0.903% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 0.677% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 0.677% | |
| 😎 | 2 | 0.451% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 0.226% | |
| 5 further kinds | 5 | 1.13% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 78 of the 105 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 449 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 105 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 36 posts held from the last 30 days (11.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
רע"מ והמשותפת תמכו באיזנקוט, יהדות התורה בחרה שלא להמליץ על אף מועמד | כך נראית מפת הממליצים, לאחר סיום שיחות ההתייעצות בבית הנשיא
🤮7👍4🔥1
"ארבע שנים של ממשלת ימין על מלא לא הביאה להם חוק גיוס, הם מבינים שהם לא יכולים יותר להתחמק מהאירוע" חברת הכנסת המיועדת מיכל רוזין מסבירה מדוע לדעתה נציגי יהדות התורה נמנעו מלהמליץ על מועמד בבית הנשיא, ומנתחת את הסיכויים לשיתוף פעולה עמם: "הם הגיעו כרגע לשוקת שבורה, יכול להיות שהם ימצאו לנכון להתחיל שיח" 📺 מתוך #תא_הכתבים עם רינת ספיבק | ערוץ כנסת 99
👍3🤡3
סיעת ביחד המליצה על יו"ר מפלגת ישר! גדי איזנקוט להרכבת הממשלה בסבב ההתייעצויות בבית הנשיא
🤮7👍2🔥2
סיעת הרשימה המשותפת המליצה על יו"ר מפלגת ישר! גדי איזנקוט להרכבת הממשלה בסבב ההתייעצויות בבית הנשיא
🤮7❤2
"אל תהיו יהודי מחמד של האיש הזה" ח"כ טלי גוטליב מגיבה לדבריו של מנסור עבאס בבית הנשיא הבוקר, שהמליץ על איזנקוט להרכבת הממשלה: "מנסור עבאס הוא אויב קיומה של מדינת ישראל כמדינת העם היהודי, הוא שקרן מכוח הקוראן" 📺 מתוך #הזירה_המרכזית עם מזל מועלם | ערוץ כנסת 99
🤮7👍3😭1
סיעת רע"מ המליצה על יו"ר מפלגת ישר! גדי איזנקוט להרכבת הממשלה בסבב ההתייעצויות בבית הנשיא
🤮2❤1
סיעת הדמוקרטים המליצה על יו"ר מפלגת ישר! גדי איזנקוט להרכבת הממשלה בסבב ההתייעצויות בבית הנשיא
👍1🤡1
סיעת עוצמה יהודית המליצה על ח״כ בנימין נתניהו להרכבת הממשלה בסבב ההתייעצויות בבית הנשיא
❤5👏2🤮2🔥1
סיעת יהדות התורה החליטה שלא להמליץ על אף חבר כנסת להרכבת הממשלה בסבב ההתייעצויות בבית הנשיא
👎3🔥1
סיעת ישראל ביתנו המליצה על גדי איזנקוט להרכבת הממשלה בסבב ההתייעצויות בבית הנשיא משלחת ישראל ביתנו לבית הנשיא כללה את ח״כ עודד פורר, אינה זילברגרץ, אלכסנדר גולדנשטיין ואמיר שניידר. קרדיט צילום תמונה: קובי גדעון/לע"מ
🔥3🤮1
סיעת ש״ס המליצה לנשיא המדינה יצחק הרצוג להטיל על בנימין נתניהו את המנדט להרכבת הממשלה הבאה נציגי ש"ס הנוכחים בפגישה עם הנשיא הרצוג: הח"כים ינון אזולאי, מיכאל מלכיאלי, יואב בן צור וחיים ביטון, וחבר הכנסת המיועד דרור עמוס קרדיט צילום תמונה: קובי גדעון/לע"מ
👍4👎2👏1🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 105 posts we hold for @knessettv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
לקראת ההתייעצויות של נציגי הסיעות בבית הנשיא, שיחלו מחר: מי לדעתכם המועמד שיקבל ראשון את המנדט להרכבת הממשלה?
- בנימין נתניהו20%
- גדי איזנקוט59%
- מועמד/ת אחר/ת1%
- לא משנה מי יקבל ראשון - העיקר שתקום ממשלה יציבה12%
- אף אחד מהם - צריך ללכת לבחירות נוספות15%
- אין לי העדפה2%
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
בזמן שהקולות עדיין נספרים - מה מהתרחישים הבאים הכי סביר בעיניכם שיתממש, לאור התוצאות נכון לשעה זו? 🗳
- ממשלת אחדות20%
- ממשלה צרה בראשות גדי איזנקוט15%
- ממשלה צרה בראשות בנימין נתניהו18%
- ממשלת רוב בראשות בנימין נתניהו21%
- אין הכרעה - סבב בחירות נוסף30%
- תרחיש אחר8%
The shares total 112%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 105 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Ben_Caspit · 28,821
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 9 September 2026
@grinzaig · 27,500
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 September 2026
@calcalist · 30,024
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 7 September 2026
@bengvir · 27,363
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 September 2026
@bnetanyahu · 59,124
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 August 2026
@kastelmoti14 · 28,821
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 September 2026
@MichaelShemesh · 26,672
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 September 2026
@lieldaphna · 57,307
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
@yaronyanir1299 · 45,145
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 27 August 2026
@sport5israel · 19,159
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 4 October 2026
@US2020US · 22,323
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 21 September 2026
@AshamsNews · 30,135
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 6 September 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | Knesset Channel |
|---|---|
| Description | Israeli television channel |
| X / Twitter | @Knesset99 |
| YouTube | UCpjNXONNE-JUz7QACB1Cgcw |
| Official site | https://knesset.tv |
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ערוץ כנסת 99” (@knessettv), 8,434 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/knessettv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.