снова почти продуктивный выходной переделали с леной ноготочки и проколола септум🌟
custom 532561712470874216817custom 54268559720962071749custom 54719420305087119588custom 52130328033813151681custom 52962846971003253371custom 54382495883246024601

Channel
@kogtisinnneeertg
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
546subscribers
+67 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002571444829 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kogtisinnneeertg |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kogtisinnneeertg |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 08:39 | 546 | +18 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:16 | 528 | +7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 07:18 | 521 | +34 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:44 | 487 | +7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:54 | 480 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 479 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
267 reactions across 8 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5325617124708742168 | 101 | 37.8% | |
| custom 5213032803381315168 | 47 | 17.6% | |
| custom 5438249588324602460 | 33 | 12.4% | |
| custom 5426855972096207174 | 32 | 12.0% | |
| custom 5471942030508711958 | 23 | 8.61% | |
| custom 5296284697100325337 | 16 | 5.99% | |
| custom 5247013777173411643 | 15 | 5.62% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 267 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
снова почти продуктивный выходной переделали с леной ноготочки и проколола септум🌟
custom 532561712470874216817custom 54268559720962071749custom 54719420305087119588custom 52130328033813151681custom 52962846971003253371custom 54382495883246024601
сделали сладкую вату ☁
custom 542685597209620717413custom 52130328033813151689custom 53256171247087421688
когда вам дропнуть окошки на сентябрь?😰
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
маленьки вкусненьки бимбо малышочки🌟🌟
custom 532561712470874216825custom 52470137771734116438custom 54382495883246024608custom 54268559720962071744
сегодня разбирали этот короб 60кг, а это всего лишь педикюрное кресло приехало моя студия сейчас похожа на склад, обязательно сниму вам распаковку🌟
custom 532561712470874216818custom 52130328033813151688custom 54719420305087119586custom 52962846971003253372
ноготочки по чаппелл роан, надеюсь в вайбик попала🤩🤩
custom 543824958832460246019custom 52470137771734116437custom 52130328033813151686
🍂🍂🍂
custom 521303280338131516815custom 52962846971003253375custom 53256171247087421684custom 54382495883246024601custom 54719420305087119581
вы вообще видели, что я вам заказала?? в канал с идеями выложила а тут забыла, на них уже очередь 🌟
custom 532561712470874216816custom 52130328033813151688custom 54268559720962071746
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 532561712470874216813custom 52962846971003253378custom 54719420305087119588custom 54382495883246024604
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @kogtisinnneeertg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
когда вам дропнуть окошки на сентябрь?😰
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“KOGTI.SINNER” (@kogtisinnneeertg), 546 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kogtisinnneeertg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.