Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Konstruktivno

Channel

Konstruktivno

@konstruktivno

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,013subscribers

+12 since we began measuring on 28 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001710464984
TypeChannel
Username@konstruktivno
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded28 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/konstruktivno

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 42% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,0012,0162,008.528 August 2026 — 2,001 subscribers28 August 2026 — 2,001 subscribers31 August 2026 — 2,005 subscribers3 September 2026 — 2,004 subscribers9 September 2026 — 2,007 subscribers13 September 2026 — 2,016 subscribers16 September 2026 — 2,013 subscribers2,01328 August 202616 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 19 days, net +12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,999–2,018 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 19:182,013-3
13 Sept 2026, 04:002,016+9
9 Sept 2026, 14:212,007+3
3 Sept 2026, 22:582,004-1
31 Aug 2026, 21:352,005+4
28 Aug 2026, 23:052,001no change
28 Aug 2026, 20:002,001first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7m 13s
Average length
2m 24s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

196 reactions across 8 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍10654.1%
❤4422.4%
🔥2814.3%
👀63.06%
😁52.55%
😱31.53%
👌21.02%
💯10.51%
🫡10.51%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 196 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 08:52 UTC722 views16 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Объект, которой претерпел кучу измов: планировки (включая размещение всех Джм), этажность, площадь застройки. Держу пальчики, чтобы все согласовали и зашли, наконец, в экспертизу🤞 Какое самое большое количество измов было у вас на объекте⁉️ Модель в Сапфире - один из последних вариантов

👍8🔥5❤3

14 Aug 2026, 14:04 UTC934 views32 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Полезная функция Лира-САПР

👍25🔥5❤2

4 Aug 2026, 10:25 UTC≈1,470 views42 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

9️⃣ лет я работала дома. Девять! И вот решила разбавить домашний уют ритмом (тишиной) коворкинга. Коворкинг — бывшее здание завода. Чистый восторг: ж/б сборняк, стальные связи, кирпич… Всё по красоте. А вот в полах забыли сделать усадочные швы. Что, конечно, дало о себе знать🫶 Схема взята из источника интернет!

👍22❤13🔥7

28 Jul 2026, 09:56 UTC≈1,620 views21 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Основное изменение для рядового проектировщика: теперь каждый проект подписывается личной ЭЦП каждого, кто «прикасался» к проекту. Как к этому относитесь⁉️ Это всё-таки другой уровень ответственности…

👍10👀6😱3❤2

15 Jul 2026, 08:27 UTC≈2,030 views13 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Неотъемлемая боль проектирования: Нужно запроектировать фундамент под стойки на пром.объекте. Легко, быстро, но есть нюанс... На этом объекте уже стоит ряд похожих стоек, и запроектированный фундамент под них не проходит по расчету. Но стойки в реальности, конечно же, стоят. И вот дилемма: запроектировать по расчету или "по опыту реальности"⁉️ Как поступаете в такой ситуации⁉️🤔

❤6😁5🔥2

1 Jul 2026, 10:42 UTC≈2,200 views23 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Добрый день. Продолжу тему коэффициентов постели! См. пост 1 См. пост 2 Сегодня публикую результаты и выводы мини исследования‼️ Также на ютюб канале опубликовано уже видео на эту тему: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2rbWdHBK3w Приятного просмотра❤️ P.S.: Выражаю огромную благодарность тех.поддержке Лиры и в частности Роману В. за наводку, базу, помощь.

👍12🔥6❤4🫡1

27 Jun 2026, 17:12 UTC≈1,760 views31 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Добрый день, дорогие🔥 На ютюб канале Саши Сулим вышло отличное интервью с Седой Каспаровой про коммуникацию. Очень советую‼️ К сожалению, коммуникация не входит в список программ школы или университета, хотя это неотъемлемая часть конструктивной взрослой жизни. Многие рабочие вопросы решаются по телефону (потому что так быстрее) или голосовыми сообщениями (конечно, используя слова "аааааа", "ЭЭЭЭ", "нуууу этаааа"), к…

👍21❤7👌2💯1

25 Jun 2026, 09:11 UTC≈1,550 views18 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Продолжим ... В прошлом посте писала про краевой эффект - завышенные С1 на углах плиты, но этот эффект можно снивелировать простым способом: 1️⃣ Выполняем все необходимые шаги и пускаем на расчет; 2️⃣ Находим максимальное значение сжимаемой толщи; 3️⃣ Задаем это значение в графе "Минимальное значение Нс" (т.е., одинаковое под всей плитой); 4️⃣ Пускаем на расчет. На картинках привела полученные значения Ну а далее м…

👍8❤7🔥3

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @konstruktivno. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Проектирование зданий
@prozru · 43,917
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 August 2026
"O'zog'irsanoatloyiha" instituti AJ
@proektloyiha · 26,199
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 16 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Konstruktivno” (@konstruktivno), 2,013 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/konstruktivno.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.