Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for کصفلیکس ⚽

Channel

کصفلیکس ⚽

@kos_Felix

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

58,411subscribers

-5,016 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002009863405
TypeChannel
Username@kos_Felix
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/kos_Felix

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

58,37363,42760,9006 August 2026 — 63,427 subscribers7 August 2026 — 63,422 subscribers8 August 2026 — 63,350 subscribers9 August 2026 — 63,200 subscribers10 August 2026 — 63,030 subscribers11 August 2026 — 62,815 subscribers12 August 2026 — 62,670 subscribers13 August 2026 — 62,630 subscribers14 August 2026 — 62,493 subscribers16 August 2026 — 62,280 subscribers17 August 2026 — 62,265 subscribers18 August 2026 — 62,174 subscribers19 August 2026 — 62,047 subscribers20 August 2026 — 61,938 subscribers21 August 2026 — 61,740 subscribers22 August 2026 — 61,590 subscribers24 August 2026 — 61,477 subscribers25 August 2026 — 61,320 subscribers26 August 2026 — 61,160 subscribers27 August 2026 — 61,024 subscribers28 August 2026 — 60,899 subscribers29 August 2026 — 60,780 subscribers30 August 2026 — 60,703 subscribers31 August 2026 — 60,597 subscribers1 September 2026 — 60,444 subscribers2 September 2026 — 60,250 subscribers4 September 2026 — 60,052 subscribers6 September 2026 — 59,758 subscribers9 September 2026 — 59,451 subscribers12 September 2026 — 59,384 subscribers13 September 2026 — 59,305 subscribers15 September 2026 — 59,201 subscribers17 September 2026 — 59,161 subscribers26 September 2026 — 58,878 subscribers4 October 2026 — 58,902 subscribers9 October 2026 — 58,551 subscribers13 October 2026 — 58,429 subscribers14 October 2026 — 58,469 subscribers15 October 2026 — 58,482 subscribers16 October 2026 — 58,453 subscribers17 October 2026 — 58,459 subscribers18 October 2026 — 58,433 subscribers19 October 2026 — 58,373 subscribers20 October 2026 — 58,454 subscribers21 October 2026 — 58,491 subscribers23 October 2026 — 58,539 subscribers23 October 2026 — 58,599 subscribers24 October 2026 — 58,606 subscribers25 October 2026 — 58,600 subscribers26 October 2026 — 58,657 subscribers27 October 2026 — 58,660 subscribers28 October 2026 — 58,627 subscribers29 October 2026 — 58,601 subscribers30 October 2026 — 58,553 subscribers31 October 2026 — 58,479 subscribers1 November 2026 — 58,560 subscribers2 November 2026 — 58,597 subscribers3 November 2026 — 58,498 subscribers4 November 2026 — 58,500 subscribers5 November 2026 — 58,411 subscribers58,4116 August 20265 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 91 days, net -5,016. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 57,615–64,185 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 15:4958,411-89
4 Nov 2026, 18:3858,500+2
3 Nov 2026, 21:0758,498-99
2 Nov 2026, 18:3658,597+37
1 Nov 2026, 16:2958,560+81
31 Oct 2026, 19:2758,479-74
30 Oct 2026, 19:0858,553-48
29 Oct 2026, 17:3558,601-26
28 Oct 2026, 18:1958,627-33
27 Oct 2026, 18:5058,660+3
26 Oct 2026, 21:2658,657+57
25 Oct 2026, 20:3058,600-6
24 Oct 2026, 19:5858,606+7
23 Oct 2026, 22:1658,599+60
23 Oct 2026, 00:5758,539+48
21 Oct 2026, 23:4658,491+37
20 Oct 2026, 15:5658,454+81
19 Oct 2026, 17:1758,373-60
18 Oct 2026, 13:5658,433-26
17 Oct 2026, 16:5058,459first reading

Engagement

1,395 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 204 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.78%
avg views ÷ 58,411 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,540
438 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.58%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
438
of 1,395 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 396 of 438 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held1,395 (5 August 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total1,989,248
Reactions total29,339
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 21:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈23,400
Videos
≈1,880
Links
≈115

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3m 54s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

62,024 reactions across 931 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥20,85033.6%
🔥10,38016.7%
🤣8,21713.2%
🤩6,86311.1%
🍌6,57610.6%
👎4,3026.94%
👍2,8624.61%
🌭1,9743.18%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 932 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 62,024 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 31 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 999 we hold a reading for · 0.3%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kos_Felix. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 31 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 438 posts held from the last 30 days (0.228%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 21:01 UTC959 views38 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

دوس دختر یامال🌚 🔞 @Kos_Felix

❤‍🔥20🤣16🤩2

5 Nov 2026, 19:35 UTC≈1,770 views38 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

آرژانتین☺️ ‌ ‌🔞 @Kos_Felix

🤩27❤‍🔥6🍌3🤣2

5 Nov 2026, 16:57 UTC≈2,600 views56 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

آلیشا لمن حسابی رو فرمه ‌ ‌🔞 @Kos_Felix

🍌45🔥6🤣2🤩2❤‍🔥1

5 Nov 2026, 16:57 UTC≈2,570 viewsread 5 November 2026
Photo

🔵 هیجان رقابت‌های امشب با میکس ویژه وینکوبت؛ فرصتی برای همراهی با مهم‌ترین دیدارهای امشب در قالب یک میکس اختصاصی! 🔴 Milan🆚🟢 Ferencevaros ⏰ Tonight 21:15 🏟 San Siro ✅[ MIX CODE ]: f82590 🎁 کد میکس بالا رو کپی کنید و داخل برگه شرط خود، در سایت وارد کنید و از میکس پیشنهادی بازی‌های امشب نهایت استفاده رو ببرید. 🔗 همین حالا وارد مینی‌اپ وینکوبت شو و فرصت رو از دست نده و دیدار جذاب امشب رو پیش‌بینی کن:👇 🤖 @Wincobet_…

5 Nov 2026, 16:50 UTC≈2,420 views55 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

استر اکسپوزیتو زید کیلیان امباپه هستن: 🔞 @Kos_Felix

🔥45🍌5👎2🤣2❤‍🔥1

5 Nov 2026, 15:31 UTC≈3,000 views62 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

دوست دختر لنارت کارل بازیکن 18 ساله بایرن مونیخ 🔞 @Kos_Felix

❤‍🔥48🤩8🍌4🔥1🤣1

5 Nov 2026, 14:11 UTC≈3,280 views68 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

همسر سرخیو راموس😍😍😍 قرمه سبزی جا افتاده اگه آدم بود: 🔞 @Kos_Felix

❤‍🔥58🍌7👍2🤣1

5 Nov 2026, 12:48 UTC≈3,490 views55 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

ناتالیا زید سابق نیمار 🔞 @Kos_Felix

❤‍🔥50🍌2👎2🤣1

5 Nov 2026, 11:26 UTC≈3,970 views102 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

وندا میلف 10/10 🔞 @Kos_Felix

❤‍🔥89🍌5🤣5👎2👍1

5 Nov 2026, 09:21 UTC≈3,940 views59 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

بانو اوا موراتی مجری شب های چمپیونزلیگ😍 🔞 @Kos_Felix

❤‍🔥56🌭1👍1🤣1

5 Nov 2026, 09:21 UTC376 viewsread 5 November 2026
Photo

🟠 نبرد سرنوشت‌ساز در هلند؛ آلکمار در برابر بانوی پیر! 💥⚡️ [ آلکمار 🔴 🆚 ⚫️ یوونتوس ] ⚽️ [ نکات کلیدی و مهم ]:👇 1⃣. آلکمار در ۱۷ بازی اخیر خانگی خود در رقابت‌های اروپایی شکست نخورده؛ آماری که کار یوونتوس را دشوار می‌کند. 2⃣. یوونتوس با ۹ گل زده در سه دیدار، یکی از بهترین خطوط حمله لیگ اروپا را در اختیار دارد. 3⃣. غیبت چند مهره مهم یوونتوس از جمله ییلدیز، تورام و لوکاتلی می‌تواند روی تعادل تیم تأثیر بگذارد. 4⃣. هر دو…

5 Nov 2026, 08:37 UTC≈1,120 views27 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

خانم پلیسه بیاد دستبند بزن بم 🔞 @Kos_Felix

🤩25🍌2

Showing the 12 most recent of 1,395 posts we hold for @kos_Felix. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 19 posts on @kos_Felix as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
9 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
30 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
17 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
5

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“کصفلیکس ⚽” (@kos_Felix), 58,411 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kos_Felix.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.