Без пафоса о пафосе
❤24
Signed Нахим Шифрин

Channel
@koteljniklive
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry
3,044subscribers
-22 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001670331197 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @koteljniklive |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/koteljniklive |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 05:22 | 3,044 | -3 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 04:17 | 3,047 | -3 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 18:40 | 3,050 | -1 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 10:38 | 3,051 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 09:15 | 3,052 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:13 | 3,055 | -7 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:36 | 3,062 | -4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:14 | 3,066 | +2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 02:11 | 3,064 | -3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 05:58 | 3,067 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:48 | 3,068 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:31 | 3,066 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:37 | 3,066 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
737 reactions across 18 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 450 | 61.1% | |
| 👍 | 120 | 16.3% | |
| 😁 | 54 | 7.33% | |
| 🔥 | 35 | 4.75% | |
| 👏 | 21 | 2.85% | |
| 🙏 | 21 | 2.85% | |
| 🤩 | 16 | 2.17% | |
| 🤣 | 4 | 0.543% | |
| 🍾 | 3 | 0.407% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 0.407% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 0.271% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 0.271% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 0.271% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.271% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.136% | |
| 🤨 | 1 | 0.136% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 737 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Без пафоса о пафосе
❤24
Signed Нахим Шифрин
Как отпустить прошлое
❤22
Signed Нахим Шифрин
Я смеялся до слёз
❤23👍6😁2🤩1
Signed Нахим Шифрин
Судьбоносные люди
❤28🤩1
Signed Нахим Шифрин
Листая свои дневники, я понял, что более или менее содержательные новеллы, из которых можно заключить что-то связное о людях, которых мне выпало знать, в основном, посвящены покойникам. Я совершенно уверен, что память о них в этих заметках ничем не оскорблена, но я бы никогда не решился написать что-нибудь похожее, если бы герои моих публикаций были еще живы. Есть всё же какое-то зыбкое, но непреложное правило, что о…
👏21❤16👍4🤩1
Signed Нахим Шифрин
На «Шоу Воли»
❤32🎉3👍2🤩2🤔1
Signed Нахим Шифрин
Вы умные и тактичные - это я подлизываюсь - чтобы не огрести за свой вопрос дюжину гневных комментов. Скажите, а вот эти многочисленные просьбы в директ, во всех соцсетях, где я держу странички, записать кружочки с поздравлениями брачующимся, разрешившимся от бремени, справившим юбилей бабушкам, выпустившимся из колледжа деточкам, победившим в ристалищах приятелям друга золовки сестры - как мне надо на это реагирова…
😁39❤13🤣4🔥3🤯2😢2👍1🤩1
Signed Нахим Шифрин
Замучился в поисках подписи под фотографией… Склоняюсь к варианту «Какой огромный дом!»
❤34🔥11👍2🤩2😁1
Signed Нахим Шифрин
Мой старший брат Самуэль. Мама говорила: «Элик у нас красивый, а Фима - у меня младшенький»
❤60👍30🙏3🥰2🤩1
Signed Нахим Шифрин
И с кем это я?
❤37👍4🤩4
Signed Нахим Шифрин
Про хейтеров
❤21👍14🤩1
Signed Нахим Шифрин
Душа нараспашку
❤15👍4🤩1
Signed Нахим Шифрин
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @koteljniklive. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | Efim Shifrin |
|---|---|
| Description | Russian actor |
| X / Twitter | @koteljnik |
| YouTube | UC3rmuPWML1-huZed5MvkWrw |
| Official site | http://shifrin.ru |
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Котельник” (@koteljniklive), 3,044 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/koteljniklive.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.