Channel
@kras_golub
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,652subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002850394127 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kras_golub |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kras_golub |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 03:38 | 1,652 | +1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 05:36 | 1,651 | -1 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 00:00 | 1,652 | +4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:26 | 1,648 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 12:03 | 1,649 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:44 | 1,651 | -2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 1,653 | -1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 14:43 | 1,654 | +3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:37 | 1,651 | -2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:27 | 1,653 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:41 | 1,652 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:19 | 1,651 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:31 | 1,651 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
71 reactions across 16 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🕊 | 71 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 74 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
КРАСНОЯРСК — НЕ СВАЛКА! ДЮКОВ — НЕ ПРИЖИВАЛКА! Один только вопрос, куда красноярские «Зелёные» и ВячеславИгорич в частности предлагают свозить мусор? В соседние регионы, где нет их избирателей? В Красноярском крае так-то все полигоны уже давно переполнены.
🕊3
В Красноярском крае с начала года сгорело 807,9 тысяч гектаров леса. Горячая, казалось бы, тема для набора электоральных очков. Но кандидатам всё не до того. Они открывают выставки фотографий особо охраняемых природных территорий краевого значения. Там красивое и пожарами не пахнет. РАБОТАТЬ ПО-НОВОМУ И ДЛЯ ЛЮДЕЙ. МОЖНО. А ЗАЧЕМ?
🕊3
У Единой России в бюллетене будет номер ОДИН. Кто бы сомневался. Нынче не до игр в демократию.
🕊4
Кто виноват в показушном снижении цен на бензин в день визита Путина, и что делать с «залётом» в федеральные ленты новостей? Опытные коллеги поспешили повесить «персональную ответственность за ситуацию на топливном рынке» на Александра Чернякова. Мол это новоиспечённый министр накреативил. Честно, не очень убедительно. Ну какой АлександрИгорич решала? Он на уровне-то СИРКИ не мог ни один вопрос решить и бегал за помо…
🕊4
В высоких кабинетах на Мира сегодня только и разговоров, что главный итог приезда Путина — скорый уезд Котюкова. Верим. Как и в то, что имя-отчество главного кандидата на замену МихалМихалычу начинается на Анатолий и заканчивается на Анатольевич.
🕊6
Правительственный Ту-214 вылетел из Москвы и взял курс на восток.
🕊6
Posted without readable text
🕊4
Пока Минусинск в очередной раз затопило, глава округа ДмитрийНиколаич Меркулов обсуждает сувениры для VIP-гостей Форума «Опорные города России». Мы вдохновились, но мерч предлагаем актуализировать. С таким администраторы южной столицы в случае очередного ливня точно не сядут в лужу перед Котюковым и его свитой. Ни один бюджетный рубль при создании нашего мерча не пострадал
🕊8
Чем дальше в лес на север, тем толще партизаны активнее кандидаты. Кроме Пономаренко, Додатко и Кулеша откопали в недрах интернетов и недавний вояж на север экс-депутата ГорСовета и ЗС, экс-минстра спорта Иркутской области и Красноярского края Павла Ростовцева. Кандидат Единой России по Кежемской региональной группе транзитом через Казачинско-Пировский и Мотыгинский МО «посетил поселок Таежный Богучанского муниципаль…
🕊5
Зачем Каптелинина переизбирается в ГосДуму? Судя по всему, Наталью Олеговну в депутатском статусе больше всего прельщает возможность заезжать «в Кремль через главные ворота и ехать по брусчатке площади под сводами Георгиевского зала» А ещё — проводить совещания на борту яхты "Бьюти" Флотилии "Рэдиссон Ройал". Но кто её осудит? Объективно это интереснее, чем плавать по затопленным улицам Красноярска.. Надеемся, в нов…
🕊6
Пиарщики тут имеются? С прадничком вас что ли.
🕊7
Даже у ресурсных кандидатов нынче никакого креатива, ходят проторёнными тропами. Без восьми недель пяти минут депутат ГосДумы Андрей Грачёв не дожидаясь назначения избрания, пустился во все тяжкие по заместителям министров. Обсудили законопроект о едином преференциальном режиме на Дальнем Востоке и в Арктике. Он направлен на создание более комфортных условий для инвесторов, новых предприятий, а следовательно – спосо…
🕊3
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @kras_golub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Голубь с Мира” (@kras_golub), 1,652 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kras_golub.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.