Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Нраица красица

Channel

Нраица красица

@krassica

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,891subscribers

-118 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001641797362
TypeChannel
Username@krassica
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/krassica

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 38% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,8917,0096,9507 August 2026 — 7,009 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,009 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,007 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,008 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,003 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,978 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,963 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,944 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,940 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,937 subscribers5 September 2026 — 6,921 subscribers10 September 2026 — 6,908 subscribers13 September 2026 — 6,894 subscribers17 September 2026 — 6,891 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 42 days, net -118. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,873–7,027 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 23:596,891-3
13 Sept 2026, 20:586,894-14
10 Sept 2026, 08:166,908-13
5 Sept 2026, 04:016,921-16
1 Sept 2026, 12:586,937-3
29 Aug 2026, 18:276,940-4
26 Aug 2026, 20:536,944-19
23 Aug 2026, 23:046,963-15
20 Aug 2026, 00:346,978-25
16 Aug 2026, 17:147,003-5
13 Aug 2026, 08:337,008+1
10 Aug 2026, 16:067,007-2
7 Aug 2026, 19:117,009no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:457,009first reading

Engagement

32 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 32 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 12s
Average length
32s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,794 reactions across 32 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
68938.4%
🔥40322.5%
😁20411.4%
👍1789.92%
custom 52583987605175315861629.03%
😍1588.81%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,794 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 16:58 UTC370 views26 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥12custom 525839876051753158684👍2

19 Aug 2026, 16:23 UTC433 views34 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Уже крутой шопер задарили🤩🤌🏼

🔥21😍5custom 525839876051753158642👍2

19 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC466 views58 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Еду на мероприятие, как всегда опаздываю 🤩 нарядилась так, будто лето на улице) надеюсь, не околею

33😍11custom 52583987605175315868😁5👍1

19 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC608 views22 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Это я к чему😑 вы вообще думали о том, что количество и качество вашего сна может влиять на выпадение волос? После того, как я прочитала этот пост, до меня дошло, что это же ведь так очевидно) да, причин у выпадения достаточно, но ведь и сон очень важен для нашего организма! И почему я раньше это не сращивала Еще один повод наладить свой режем🤩 Вот этот пост тоже вдогонку прочтите) ну так, чтоб не забывали 🤩

14🔥4custom 52583987605175315862👍1😍1

19 Aug 2026, 10:57 UTC637 views15 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Я тут наткнулась на один интересный пост в тг, но сначала немного интерактива🤩

9👍4🔥1😍1

19 Aug 2026, 10:57 UTC637 views22 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Poll

Во-сколько вы ложитесь спать?

  1. 22:00-00:00 (я не верю в существование этих людей)58%
  2. 00:00-02:00 (здесь уже верю, сама такая)36%
  3. 02:00-04:00 (сериалы, компьютерные игры? признавайтесь)5%
  4. Как вы все успеваете? Просто мы не спим! (с) Олечка Бузова1%
  5. Свой вариант в комментариях 💅🏼0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

😁145👍2🔥1

19 Aug 2026, 08:10 UTC696 views64 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Я тут пропала чуть-чуть, зависала в мейкап культуре 👀 Чуть не обосикалась от счастья, потому что попала к топ оф зе топ мастеру на стрижку Спасибо Сашуле за это🤩 Нужно было освежить концы, так как выход из темного в блонд не мог пройти бесследно 👍 сейчас я метаюсь между «сохранить длину» и «сохранить только здоровую длину». Можно было бы снова резануть каре, чтобы отращивать уже нормальное полотно, но блен, я же у

🔥4210custom 52583987605175315866😍5👍1

17 Aug 2026, 15:58 UTC942 views57 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Вы знаете, как я обожаю конкриты, решила поделиться способами его нанесения в макияже🤭 Оттенок Chocolate 🤩 актуально на осень будет, кстати Так же использовала кисти того же бренда: 0 – для конструирования, 10 – для стрел Помимо способов, о которых я сказала в ролике, можно использовать данный конкрит и в качестве теней/подложек, а также для оформления бровей Супер средство! Универсальное 🤩 к слову, оттенок может

29🔥13👍6custom 52583987605175315866😍3

17 Aug 2026, 11:25 UTC≈1,010 views36 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Вот это новости!!! Как, наверное, расстроились те, кто летал ради него в Турцию, Грузию и Казахстан 🥵 Но, раньше времени не радуемся, а то было уже раз такое, что он должен был выступить у нас 😂 причем относительно недавно

23😁7🔥3👍1😍1custom 52583987605175315861

17 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTC946 views23 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Неожиданная и приятная рассылочка, от нашего российского бренда GRACEFACE🤩 Люблю их тканевые патчи, писала неоднократно, но слышала, что они начали выпускать и гидрогелевые) я не пробовала, может вы тестировали? Что там, как? Тут они положили поштучно, но они вообще другие, конечно А вообще, я считаю, их тканевые маски незаслуженно обделены вниманием….бюджетные, можно сразу купить огромную пачку👺 по эффекту вот чт

17👍2custom 52583987605175315862🔥1😍1

17 Aug 2026, 08:51 UTC976 views22 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Пустая банки месяца — тонер-мист 345 от Dr.Althea и крем-мист от AESTURA🫧 Понимаю, почему 345й все нахваливают: легкий, не дает ощущение липкости, увлажняет круто, создает красивое сияние Протестирован вдоль и поперек, при разных обстоятельствах, в разных ситуациях. И в соло наслаивала, как тонер, и как увлажняющий мист, и между разными этапами ухода, и поверх макияж и перед ним…короче говоря, во всех экспериментах

15👍3🔥2😍1custom 52583987605175315861

16 Aug 2026, 15:06 UTC887 views115 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

🐱

74🔥24custom 525839876051753158610😍6😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @krassica. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Aug 2026, 10:57 UTCAnonymous Poll252 voters

Во-сколько вы ложитесь спать?

  1. 22:00-00:00 (я не верю в существование этих людей)58%
  2. 00:00-02:00 (здесь уже верю, сама такая)36%
  3. 02:00-04:00 (сериалы, компьютерные игры? признавайтесь)5%
  4. Как вы все успеваете? Просто мы не спим! (с) Олечка Бузова1%
  5. Свой вариант в комментариях 💅🏼0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 19 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Rudovans
@rudovans · 38,710
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 5 September 2026
Соня Гельд. Просто. Элегантно. Со вкусом
@soniageld · 41,422
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Нраица красица” (@krassica), 6,891 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/krassica.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.