Channel
@kresimir_matic
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,983subscribers
-38 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001395720663 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kresimir_matic |
| Created | 14 January 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kresimir_matic |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 10:18 | 4,983 | -6 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 10:57 | 4,989 | -7 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 04:36 | 4,996 | +23 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 07:18 | 4,973 | -7 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 10:48 | 4,980 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:06 | 4,983 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:37 | 4,986 | -6 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 09:23 | 4,992 | -7 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 09:52 | 4,999 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:12 | 5,001 | -9 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:26 | 5,010 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:52 | 5,013 | -7 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:00 | 5,020 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:34 | 5,021 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:56 | 5,021 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 6 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
919 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 665 | 72.4% | |
| 👍 | 181 | 19.7% | |
| 👏 | 50 | 5.44% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 1.09% | |
| 🙏 | 7 | 0.762% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 0.326% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 0.218% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.109% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 919 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Clarity akt potvrđen datum 🔥 NOVI ČLANAK JE OBJAVLJEN! Od 15. Septembra nadalje CLARITY Act ulazi u ključni prozor senatskog odlučivanja. Što to može značiti za XRP, ISO 20022 coine, tokenizaciju i novi globalni financijski sustav? 🔥 Slagalica se otvara komad po komad — a ovo bi mogao biti jedan od najvećih komada do sada. Cijelu NFS analizu pročitajte ovdje: https://izvansistema.com/article.php/127/clarity-act-od…
👍25👏5
Ne gradim chatbot. Gradim operativnog AI asistenta koji istražuje, analizira, povezuje informacije, prati zadatke i priprema odluke. Njegovo ime je VIKTOR. Uskoro ćete vidjeti što zapravo može. 🔥
❤38🔥10👍8
Danas Trump ima novu objavu Mi smo analizirali ono što većina nije ni pogledala. Donald Trump objavio je novu poruku o Iranu i Hormuškom tjesnacu. Većina ljudi pročitala je sadržaj, procijenila političku poruku i nastavila dalje. Mi smo krenuli drugim putem. Nismo analizirali samo tekst. Provjerili smo: • originalni status ID • točno vrijeme nastanka objave • sekundu objave • broj riječi, slova i znakova • m…
❤57👍13
FINANCIJSKI SWITCH JE POČEO. Ne kao jedan veliki događaj i ne kao jedan datum nakon kojeg će se sve odjednom promijeniti, nego kroz proces koji je već krenuo unutar financijske infrastrukture. Tokenizirana imovina prelazi iz testiranja u produkciju, institucionalna poravnanja postaju stvarna, a različite mreže počinju dobivati jasne i međusobno odvojene uloge. Zato nekoliko dana nisam ništa objavljivao. Vijesti je…
👍49❤18
Ako vlastiti novac ne možeš koristiti bez limita, aplikacije, provjere, autorizacije i dopuštenja sustava — gdje je onda stvarna granica vlasništva? Tema gotovine, banaka, digitalnog novca i financijske slobode više nije teorija. To je već svakodnevni život običnog čovjeka. Pročitaj članak ovdje: https://izvansistema.com/article.php/109/kad-tvoj-novac-stoji-u-banci-da-li-stvarno-tvoj
👍27❤7👏2
1000 zašto - 1000 zato pinned a photo
Kada novac dođe Danas sam javno objavio knjigu “Kada novac dođe”. Ovo nije knjiga o brzoj zaradi i nije klasični financijski priručnik. Više je knjiga o čovjeku. O tome kako ostati miran, priseban i odgovoran kada se život stvarno počne mijenjati. Jer jedno je pričati o promjeni, učiti i pripremati se, a nešto sasvim drugo je znati što napraviti kada se otvore nove mogućnosti, kada dođe više novca, više izbora, a…
❤52👍2
Kad banka koristi tvoj novac i na njemu zarađuje, to je normalan posao. Kad običan čovjek želi da i njegov novac radi za njega, odjednom se kaže da je to “opasno” i da ga treba zaštititi. Ali od čega ga zapravo štite? Od mogućnosti da i on dobije dio onoga što velike firme, fondovi i banke već godinama koriste? Ovo nije komplicirana financijska tema. Ovo je pitanje zdravog razuma. Napisao sam članak jednostavnim …
❤39
Nećete više znati što je istina, a što laž Novi članak je vani. Tema je BRICS, dolar, Trumpove prijetnje carinama i sve veći informacijski kaos oko novca. Ali poanta nije u tome da je BRICS sutra srušio dolar, jer nije. Poanta je u tome da se financijski sustav mijenja, a javnosti se sve češće serviraju simboli, poluistine, dramatični naslovi i narativi koji ljude više zbunjuju nego informiraju. Zato je važno zna…
❤28👍13
Poklanjam vam novu besplatnu publikaciju: Prije nego novac dođe Ovo je uvod u temu koju smatram izuzetno važnom: što napraviti prije nego veći novac stvarno dođe u život čovjeka. Jer novac sam po sebi ne rješava sve. Ako čovjek nema mir, plan, sigurnost, privatnost i granice, veći novac može otvoriti jednako puno problema koliko i mogućnosti. Ova publikacija je prvi korak. Uskoro dolazi i puna knjiga: "Kada novac…
❤56
Materijal koji je prvotno bio zamišljen kao Zoom predavanje odlučio sam pretvoriti u publikaciju. Zašto? Zato što mnogim ljudima danas više treba miran tekst koji mogu pročitati svojim tempom, vratiti se na njega, označiti ono što im je važno i polako povezati pojmove, nego još jedan Zoom koji prođe i nestane. Publikacija se zove: NOVAC MIJENJA OBLIK Vodič za mirno razumijevanje promjene financijskog sustava Napis…
❤75
🔥 Nova Vijest dana je na portalu Europske banke upravo ulaze puno ozbiljnije u stablecoin utrku. Projekt Qivalis dobio je još 25 banaka, što znači da sada iza njega stoji ukupno 37 financijskih institucija iz 15 zemalja. Cilj je jasan: stvoriti regulirani euro stablecoin i odgovoriti na dominaciju dolarskih stablecoina. Ovo više nije priča o “crypto svijetu sa strane”. Ovo je signal da se stari bankarski sustav p…
❤32👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @kresimir_matic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“1000 zašto - 1000 zato” (@kresimir_matic), 4,983 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kresimir_matic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.