Crypto ve Forex de bilmeniz gereken her şey burada!!!(hiç bir yerde görmediğiniz strateji ve analizler)
YouTube: https://youtube.com/@kriptoalitv
İletişim: @Kriptotvali
Created
Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 725–727 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Sept 2026, 14:22
726
no change
8 Sept 2026, 13:47
726
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
16.9%
avg views ÷ 726 subscribers
Avg views / post
122
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 September 2026
Posts held
20 (6 August 2026 – 8 September 2026)
Views total
2,081
Reactions total
86
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Sept 2026, 14:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,760
Videos
≈54
Links
≈168
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
86 reactions across 10 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
29
33.7%
🙏
16
18.6%
🔥
13
15.1%
👏
8
9.30%
🏆
5
5.81%
😍
5
5.81%
🫡
4
4.65%
👍
2
2.33%
💯
2
2.33%
👌
1
1.16%
👨💻
1
1.16%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 86 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 8 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
“Eğer grafikte birbirine yakın iki direnç görürsen, hangisini baz alman gerektiğini nasıl anlayacaksın?”
Basit bir pratik kural var:
📌 İşleme Giriş ➡️ Uygun direnç: Daha uzaktaki direnç
💎 Nedeni: Fiyatın kırılımını ve üstüne çıkmasını daha güçlü şekilde doğrular.
🎯 Hedef Belirleme ➡️ Uygun direnç: Daha yakındaki direnç
💎 Nedeni: Daha temkinli bir hedef olur ve gerçekleşme ihtimali daha yüksektir.
Eğer alt tarafta…
Market analisti Altcoin Hunter, yaptığı bir paylaşımda şunları yazdı:
Bu gerçekten çok önemli bir grafik.
Eğer Bitcoin büyük bir boğa sezonuna girecekse, öncesinde 44.000 dolar seviyelerine kadar bir düzeltme görebiliriz.
Eğer bu seviyeye dokunursa, sonrasında çok büyük ve sağlıklı bir yükseliş rallisinin başlamasını sağlayabilir. 🚀
Bu akşamki videoda bitcon grafiğinde bizleri neler bekliyor çok önemli nedenlerle…
📚 #EĞİTİM
Fibonacci’nin altın oranlarını Arz & Talep seviyeleri + Hacim ile birleştirme stratejisi
Fibonacci’nin altın oranı 0.618’dir ama biz iki sayıyı altın oran olarak kabul ediyoruz: 0.618 ve 0.78
Fiyat bu seviyelere her geldiğinde genellikle bir tepki verir. Ama bu seviyeleri daha doğru kullanmak ve fake seviyelere kanmamak için Arz & Talep seviyeleriyle birlikte değerlendirmek gerekiyor.
Yani bu iki sayı, …
Uzun bir aradan sonra altcoinlerin toplam piyasa değeri 200 milyar dolar seviyesini aştı🕯
Piyasa değeri 200 milyar doların üzerinde kaldığı sürece altcoinlerin yükselişi de daha rahat ve güçlü bir şekilde devam edebilir. 🚀
📱 @kriptoalitv | 📱Youtube
⁉️ iletişim: @kriptotvali
“ Mantıken, zayıf bir setup ile tam onaylı bir setup’a aynı miktarda risk almak mantıklı mı?”
Sadece iki tane başlangıç sinyali veren bir setup ile, ana trigger’ı aktif olmuş ve checklist’teki daha fazla onayı almış bir setup aynı kalitede değildir.
🎯 Setup’ların Risk Seviyesine Göre Sınıflandırılması:
🔴 ÇOK RİSKLİ
Stratejinin ana onayı henüz gelmemiş.
🟠 RİSKLİ
Sinyaller erken gelmiş ve tam onay yok.
🟡 NORMAL
An…
Altcoinler ısınıyor mu?
Şu anda altcoinlerin yaklaşık %85’inde funding rate kendi ortalamasının üzerinde. Bu, Bitcoin’in tüm zamanların zirvesinden bu yana görmediğimiz bir seviye!
Peki bu ne demek? 👇
Trader’lar altcoinlerin yükseleceğine daha fazla bahis oynuyor ve piyasa havası bayağı pozitif. 📈
Eğer bu gerçekten bir altcoin sezonunun başlangıcıysa, bu durum birkaç hafta daha devam edebilir.
Tabii herkes long’a…
Sadece 5 günde kripto piyasasına 400 milyar dolar para girdi; bu da toplam piyasa değerinin neredeyse %20’sine denk geliyor. 🚀
Piyasaya giren para akışı resmen patladı! 🔥💰
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kriptoalitv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Youtube da tekrar strateji videoları başlasın mı? 🔥🚀
Hayır0%
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 8 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
MERTER ZORLU ANALİZ @MERTERZORLU · 33,428 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Kripto Ali” (@kriptoalitv), 726 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kriptoalitv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
