Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for KRISTIAN VISION

Channel

KRISTIAN VISION

@kristian_vision

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,159subscribers

-508 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002080582449
TypeChannel
Username@kristian_vision
Created4 March 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/kristian_vision

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,1596,6676,41313 August 2026 — 6,667 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,667 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,649 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,637 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,620 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,600 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,587 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,566 subscribers4 September 2026 — 6,547 subscribers10 September 2026 — 6,504 subscribers13 September 2026 — 6,482 subscribers17 September 2026 — 6,457 subscribers25 September 2026 — 6,419 subscribers4 October 2026 — 6,381 subscribers10 October 2026 — 6,356 subscribers14 October 2026 — 6,339 subscribers17 October 2026 — 6,317 subscribers20 October 2026 — 6,276 subscribers23 October 2026 — 6,254 subscribers26 October 2026 — 6,233 subscribers29 October 2026 — 6,215 subscribers1 November 2026 — 6,184 subscribers4 November 2026 — 6,167 subscribers7 November 2026 — 6,159 subscribers13 August 20267 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 86 days, net -508. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,083–6,743 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 13:576,159-8
4 Nov 2026, 20:096,167-17
1 Nov 2026, 16:306,184-31
29 Oct 2026, 21:576,215-18
26 Oct 2026, 18:596,233-21
23 Oct 2026, 15:396,254-22
20 Oct 2026, 14:016,276-41
17 Oct 2026, 12:486,317-22
14 Oct 2026, 06:196,339-17
10 Oct 2026, 15:006,356-25
4 Oct 2026, 22:196,381-38
25 Sept 2026, 08:196,419-38
17 Sept 2026, 06:576,457-25
13 Sept 2026, 16:586,482-22
10 Sept 2026, 08:406,504-43
4 Sept 2026, 18:176,547-19
1 Sept 2026, 08:456,566-21
29 Aug 2026, 06:526,587-13
26 Aug 2026, 03:226,600-20
23 Aug 2026, 04:136,620first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 4 March 2024 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.44%
avg views ÷ 6,159 subscribers
Avg views / post
581
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
3
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 October 2026
Posts held23 (4 March 2024 – 31 October 2026)
Views total1,744
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 16:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 35s
Average length
2m 18s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

31 Oct 2026, 07:32 UTC317 viewsread 6 November 2026

В августе я ездил в Барселону, вот мои наблюдения Я был в Барселоне в 2014, 2017, 2018, 2019 и в этом 2026 году. Есть с чем сравнить. Я был там 7 дней, активно гулял по всему городу, общался с таксистами и наблюдал за общей обстановкой. Барселона все также красива и неповторима. Но… уровень безопасности не соответствует уровню города. Безопасно, лишь в центральных районах города, в сальных районах стабильно напряж…

31 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC626 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Европа горит. Каковы истинные причины? Разбираю в новом видео: https://youtu.be/l-bvHfYseD4?si=j0MWLoG7QxC9Hq2n Мы с вами находимся внутри переустройства мирового порядка. #YouTube @kristian_vision

19 Oct 2026, 20:32 UTC801 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

КИМ ЧЕН ЫН УМЕР? В сети активно распространяются слухи о смерти лидера Северной Кореи. По неподтверждённой информации, Ким Чен Ын перенёс кровоизлияние в мозг, впал в кому и был экстренно доставлен на лечение в Китай. Историю уже подхватили зарубежные СМИ, включая британское издание The Sun. Официальных подтверждений нет. В 2020 году Ким Чен Ына уже объявляли мёртвым, однако впоследствии он появился на публике. П…

9 Sept 2026, 12:49 UTC≈1,360 viewsread 6 November 2026
Video

GPT-6 Astra только что ударила по самой идее CAPTCHA. Модель прошла все 48 уровней тестов «Я не робот» — от обычного распознавания изображений до сложных UI-задач, головоломок и интерактивных сценариев. И вот здесь начинается самое интересное. CAPTCHA годами была одним из базовых способов отличить человека от бота. Теперь ИИ умеет видеть экран, понимать, что происходит в интерфейсе, и самостоятельно выполнять необ…

30 Jul 2026, 14:57 UTC≈1,550 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

75% нового кода в Google уже пишется с помощью ИИ. И нет, это не история про то, что программисты “стали не нужны”. Это история про другое: сильных специалистов не убрали, а усилили. Их просто научили работать по-новому, и теперь они могут делать в несколько раз больше, чем раньше. Вот это и есть главный смысл всей ИИ-революции, который многие до сих пор не поняли. Да, часть профессий действительно попадёт под давл…

25 Jul 2026, 09:49 UTC≈1,240 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

ChatGPT лег во всем мире. @kristian_vision

17 Jul 2026, 13:59 UTC≈1,420 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Нужно ли проходить курсы по ИИ для того чтобы полноценно начать использовать этот инструмент? 🤔 Краткий ответ — НЕТ. Насколько эффективно или неэффективно вы будете использовать нейронку в своей жизни, зависит только от вас. Как только вы нащупаете возможности, которые облегчают вам рабочую рутину, помогают структурировать задачи, вы поймаете вот эту волну энтузиазма и вас будет нести по инерции. Вы сами нащупаете в…

14 Jul 2026, 15:05 UTC≈1,260 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Я почти перестал печатать. Ловите одно из самых полезных AI-приложений, которое я нашёл за последнее время — Wispr Flow Пользуюсь им каждый день, и теперь большинство сообщений, заметок, постов и даже промптов для ИИ я просто надиктовываю голосом. Почему мне настолько понравилось: • Пишет практически в любом приложении. • Понимает контекст и нормально расставляет пунктуацию. • Убирает слова-паразиты и оговорки. •…

8 Jul 2026, 05:47 UTC≈1,170 viewsread 6 November 2026

Совет дня по ИИ — Задавайте как можно больше наводящих вопросов + давайте нейронке больше контекста. Результат вас удивит 🤝 @kristian_vision

2 Jul 2026, 20:26 UTC≈1,510 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Claude Fable 5 снова доступен. Но его конечно же серьёзно “пофиксили”. Если вы следили за первой версией модели, то знаете, насколько впечатляющими были её возможности. Именно поэтому вокруг неё было столько шума. Теперь часть самых интересных сценариев использования закрыли дополнительными ограничениями и фильтрами. При подозрительных запросах модель может переключать пользователя на менее мощную версию или прост…

29 Jun 2026, 13:55 UTC≈1,180 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

GTA VI — это уже не просто игра. Это показатель того, насколько дорогим стало создание цифровых продуктов. По разным оценкам, разработка GTA VI обошлась примерно в $2 млрд. Для сравнения: строительство Бурдж-Халифы стоило около $1,5 млрд в ценах 2009 года.🤯 Но меня здесь заинтересовало другое. Мы постепенно приходим к ситуации, где создание действительно выдающегося продукта становится доступно только крупнейшим …

26 Jun 2026, 16:25 UTC≈1,070 viewsread 6 November 2026

Капитал уходит в искусственный интеллект Искусственный интеллект сегодня уже не просто хайп, очевидно. Это новый центр притяжения денег, внимания, талантов, инфраструктуры и политических решений. Посмотрите на NVIDIA. Ещё недавно для большинства людей это была компания про видеокарты. Сегодня это символ новой экономики и одна из самых дорогих компаний в мире. Почему? Потому что рынок начал понимать простую вещь:…

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @kristian_vision. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

17 Jun 2026, 15:12 UTCAnonymous Poll103 voters

Насколько активно ты используешь нейронки в своей жизни?

  1. Использую очень активно, не могу представить свою рутину без ИИ35%
  2. Использую иногда34%
  3. Использую достаточно редко12%
  4. Не использую ИИ вообще19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 4 March 2024 to 31 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ПРОИСКУССТВО/PROISKUSSTVO
@yulya_pro_iskusstvo · 19,252
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 4 October 2026
Фигуры и формы
@sculpturearts · 29,385
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 8 September 2026
Sodom and Gomorrah
@SodomAnd_Gomorrah · 33,771
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 4 September 2026
Мировая Живопись
@mir_painting · 36,965
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 1 September 2026
Ру́сский музей
@budnirusskogo · 34,769
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 3 September 2026
Пейзаж на холсте | Галерея
@kartiny_tg · 67,336
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
Приступ вежливости
@etiquette_pv · 29,226
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 8 September 2026
Саморазвитие онлайн
@samorazvition · 134,412
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 13 August 2026
По Фрейду | Психоанализ
@accto_freud · 100,316
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 15 August 2026
Дневник Академика Павлова | Саморазвитие
@academicpavlov · 112,590
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“KRISTIAN VISION” (@kristian_vision), 6,159 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kristian_vision.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.