В августе я ездил в Барселону, вот мои наблюдения Я был в Барселоне в 2014, 2017, 2018, 2019 и в этом 2026 году. Есть с чем сравнить. Я был там 7 дней, активно гулял по всему городу, общался с таксистами и наблюдал за общей обстановкой. Барселона все также красива и неповторима. Но… уровень безопасности не соответствует уровню города. Безопасно, лишь в центральных районах города, в сальных районах стабильно напряж…

Channel
KRISTIAN VISION
@kristian_vision
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,159subscribers
-508 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002080582449 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kristian_vision |
| Created | 4 March 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 24 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kristian_vision |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 13:57 | 6,159 | -8 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 20:09 | 6,167 | -17 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 16:30 | 6,184 | -31 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 21:57 | 6,215 | -18 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 18:59 | 6,233 | -21 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 15:39 | 6,254 | -22 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 14:01 | 6,276 | -41 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 12:48 | 6,317 | -22 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 06:19 | 6,339 | -17 |
| 10 Oct 2026, 15:00 | 6,356 | -25 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 22:19 | 6,381 | -38 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 08:19 | 6,419 | -38 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 06:57 | 6,457 | -25 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 16:58 | 6,482 | -22 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 08:40 | 6,504 | -43 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 18:17 | 6,547 | -19 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:45 | 6,566 | -21 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:52 | 6,587 | -13 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:22 | 6,600 | -20 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 04:13 | 6,620 | first reading |
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 4 March 2024 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 9.44%
- avg views ÷ 6,159 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 581
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 3
- of 23 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 23 (4 March 2024 – 31 October 2026) |
| Views total | 1,744 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 16:44 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 4m 35s
- Average length
- 2m 18s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Европа горит. Каковы истинные причины? Разбираю в новом видео: https://youtu.be/l-bvHfYseD4?si=j0MWLoG7QxC9Hq2n Мы с вами находимся внутри переустройства мирового порядка. #YouTube @kristian_vision
КИМ ЧЕН ЫН УМЕР? В сети активно распространяются слухи о смерти лидера Северной Кореи. По неподтверждённой информации, Ким Чен Ын перенёс кровоизлияние в мозг, впал в кому и был экстренно доставлен на лечение в Китай. Историю уже подхватили зарубежные СМИ, включая британское издание The Sun. Официальных подтверждений нет. В 2020 году Ким Чен Ына уже объявляли мёртвым, однако впоследствии он появился на публике. П…
GPT-6 Astra только что ударила по самой идее CAPTCHA. Модель прошла все 48 уровней тестов «Я не робот» — от обычного распознавания изображений до сложных UI-задач, головоломок и интерактивных сценариев. И вот здесь начинается самое интересное. CAPTCHA годами была одним из базовых способов отличить человека от бота. Теперь ИИ умеет видеть экран, понимать, что происходит в интерфейсе, и самостоятельно выполнять необ…
75% нового кода в Google уже пишется с помощью ИИ. И нет, это не история про то, что программисты “стали не нужны”. Это история про другое: сильных специалистов не убрали, а усилили. Их просто научили работать по-новому, и теперь они могут делать в несколько раз больше, чем раньше. Вот это и есть главный смысл всей ИИ-революции, который многие до сих пор не поняли. Да, часть профессий действительно попадёт под давл…
ChatGPT лег во всем мире. @kristian_vision
Нужно ли проходить курсы по ИИ для того чтобы полноценно начать использовать этот инструмент? 🤔 Краткий ответ — НЕТ. Насколько эффективно или неэффективно вы будете использовать нейронку в своей жизни, зависит только от вас. Как только вы нащупаете возможности, которые облегчают вам рабочую рутину, помогают структурировать задачи, вы поймаете вот эту волну энтузиазма и вас будет нести по инерции. Вы сами нащупаете в…
Я почти перестал печатать. Ловите одно из самых полезных AI-приложений, которое я нашёл за последнее время — Wispr Flow Пользуюсь им каждый день, и теперь большинство сообщений, заметок, постов и даже промптов для ИИ я просто надиктовываю голосом. Почему мне настолько понравилось: • Пишет практически в любом приложении. • Понимает контекст и нормально расставляет пунктуацию. • Убирает слова-паразиты и оговорки. •…
Совет дня по ИИ — Задавайте как можно больше наводящих вопросов + давайте нейронке больше контекста. Результат вас удивит 🤝 @kristian_vision
Claude Fable 5 снова доступен. Но его конечно же серьёзно “пофиксили”. Если вы следили за первой версией модели, то знаете, насколько впечатляющими были её возможности. Именно поэтому вокруг неё было столько шума. Теперь часть самых интересных сценариев использования закрыли дополнительными ограничениями и фильтрами. При подозрительных запросах модель может переключать пользователя на менее мощную версию или прост…
GTA VI — это уже не просто игра. Это показатель того, насколько дорогим стало создание цифровых продуктов. По разным оценкам, разработка GTA VI обошлась примерно в $2 млрд. Для сравнения: строительство Бурдж-Халифы стоило около $1,5 млрд в ценах 2009 года.🤯 Но меня здесь заинтересовало другое. Мы постепенно приходим к ситуации, где создание действительно выдающегося продукта становится доступно только крупнейшим …
Капитал уходит в искусственный интеллект Искусственный интеллект сегодня уже не просто хайп, очевидно. Это новый центр притяжения денег, внимания, талантов, инфраструктуры и политических решений. Посмотрите на NVIDIA. Ещё недавно для большинства людей это была компания про видеокарты. Сегодня это символ новой экономики и одна из самых дорогих компаний в мире. Почему? Потому что рынок начал понимать простую вещь:…
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @kristian_vision. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Насколько активно ты используешь нейронки в своей жизни?
- Использую очень активно, не могу представить свою рутину без ИИ35%
- Использую иногда34%
- Использую достаточно редко12%
- Не использую ИИ вообще19%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 4 March 2024 to 31 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@yulya_pro_iskusstvo · 19,252
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 4 October 2026
@sculpturearts · 29,385
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 8 September 2026
@SodomAnd_Gomorrah · 33,771
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 4 September 2026
@mir_painting · 36,965
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 1 September 2026
@budnirusskogo · 34,769
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 3 September 2026
@kartiny_tg · 67,336
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
@etiquette_pv · 29,226
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 8 September 2026
@samorazvition · 134,412
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 13 August 2026
@accto_freud · 100,316
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 15 August 2026
@academicpavlov · 112,590
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“KRISTIAN VISION” (@kristian_vision), 6,159 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kristian_vision.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.