Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Kristoffee // 🍎 🍏

Channel

Kristoffee // 🍎 🍏

@kristoffegg

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

54subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004431645513
TypeChannel
Username@kristoffegg
Created30 July 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/kristoffegg

Growth

5155536 August 2026 — 51 subscribers7 August 2026 — 52 subscribers10 August 2026 — 52 subscribers13 August 2026 — 54 subscribers20 August 2026 — 55 subscribers27 August 2026 — 54 subscribers546 August 202627 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 21 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 50–56 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 14:5554-1
20 Aug 2026, 17:0355+1
13 Aug 2026, 16:0754+2
10 Aug 2026, 10:0152no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:4652+1
6 Aug 2026, 16:4451first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

224 reactions across 14 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52152906848686844857433.0%
4319.2%
custom 52605950306990411823314.7%
219.38%
custom 5866037187228736692177.59%
🔥104.46%
🍓83.57%
❤‍🔥73.13%
custom 541335199362214686252.23%
👾31.34%
custom 541374235890471268920.893%
💘10.446%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 224 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 16:43 UTC23 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Рисовал для коллаба фон и своего перса, а я на даче, но попробую сегодня что-нибудь на бумаге нарисовать

custom 58660371872287366927custom 526059503069904118231

9 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTC23 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @perechrestokPhoto

СКАЛА Под ногами чувствуется твёрдая земля, а лицо обвевает лёгким ветерком. Вы выше хмар, кажется что ещё чуть чуть и достанете до ворот царства небесного, или же выйдете за атмосферу планеты на которой обитаете, но вы прерываете эти мысли чтобы взглянуть на то к чему столько шли. ︶⊹︶︶୨୧︶︶⊹︶︶⊹︶︶୨୧︶︶⊹ Со скалы открывается безкрайний вид на землю, бесконечные деревья, длиннющие реки и ватные хмары, вы забываете об

custom 52152906848686844854custom 526059503069904118221

9 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTC22 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @perechrestokPhoto

ЛАРЁК Под конец прогулки сходя по горной трапинке вы замечаете старенький одинокий ларёк.Никого внутри нету, но на товарах и сувенирах нету ни единой пылинки. Некоторые вам приглянулись, поэтому вся группа единогласно согласилась остаться и подождать продавца, но никто так и не вернулся. ︶⊹︶︶୨୧︶︶⊹︶︶⊹︶︶୨୧︶︶⊹ Взяв то что вам приглянулось вы оставили деньги на кассе и отправились домой с новыми покупками. Над фоном

custom 52152906848686844855custom 541374235890471268921

7 Aug 2026, 20:09 UTC35 views17 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Красивое небо, надо бы закрыть👀 Мне отправляют на дачу на неделю, поэтому без качественных порисулек, но хочу похвастаться что я отрисовал два коллаба и рано или поздно вы их увидите #Mineshield #PPL #PWGood #Скетч

custom 521529068486868448594❤‍🔥2💘1🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 19:54 UTC68 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
File

Арт рисовался кстати под инструментал Cut the Cord от The Living Tombstone #песни

🔥6👾32

4 Aug 2026, 18:52 UTC73 views25 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩⭐️🤩🤩🍎👁️🌟 Мне оч нравится, но фон как обычно пососал ибо я устал Файл в коментах #Mineshield #PPL #PWGood #Арт

custom 526059503069904118211custom 58660371872287366927custom 521529068486868448551🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 15:49 UTC64 views17 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Я не могу этого не показать Глазки мне нравятся #щп

custom 5215290684868684485933🔥1custom 58660371872287366921

4 Aug 2026, 15:22 UTC53 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026

А еще я случайно пропустил мимо ушей то что меня в анонке просили скинуть свои работы с прошло тгк, извиняюсь за это Под эти постом буду по тихонько кидать прошлые работы #СтарыйКанал

custom 5413351993622146862522

4 Aug 2026, 15:21 UTC55 views18 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Я все же сел за эту работу, задумка изначально была другая, но так жарко что мне лень ее реализовывать и трепаться с тенями, поэтому придумаю что-то полегче 🌟 #PPL #PWGood #WIP

custom 526059503069904118284custom 52152906848686844853custom 586603718722873669221

3 Aug 2026, 17:58 UTC63 views30 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Чет ничего не получается, ни рисовать, ничего. Сейчас дорисовываю коллаб, и возможно сяду за этого ПВГуда🙂 #PPL #PWGood #WIP <— ?

15custom 521529068486868448510🍓2custom 526059503069904118221

31 Jul 2026, 20:28 UTC134 views40 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🤩🌟🤩🤩⭐️👾👾👾👾 Ну чет, даже не рыгаю с них Файл как всегда в комментах #PPL #SolidLeader #N_E_V_O_S #Арт

custom 52152906848686844852111❤‍🔥5custom 52605950306990411822🔥1

31 Jul 2026, 15:16 UTC121 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Уродышь #PPL #SolidLeader #WIP

custom 521529068486868448585🍓2

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @kristoffegg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Kristoffee // 🍎 🍏” (@kristoffegg), 54 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kristoffegg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.