всем привет у меня день рождения
custom 547428612487462126118

Channel
@krovotochitt
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
350subscribers
+41 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003842130993 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @krovotochitt |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 7 June 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/krovotochitt |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 06:57 | 350 | +7 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 09:41 | 343 | +15 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:38 | 328 | +2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:24 | 326 | +8 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:53 | 318 | +9 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:53 | 309 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:01 | 309 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
452 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5474286124874621261 | 165 | 36.5% | |
| custom 5472240698239517495 | 149 | 33.0% | |
| custom 5406885091429343786 | 103 | 22.8% | |
| custom 5386376223159001813 | 35 | 7.74% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 452 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @krovotochitt. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 June 2026 to 2 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
всем привет у меня день рождения
custom 547428612487462126118
3 слот уже неактуален, первые два!
ִֶָ. ..𓂃 ࣪ ִֶָ🪽་༘࿐ если посмотреть на продажи с точки зрения психологии, становится намного понятнее, почему одни чаттеры могут продавать один и тот же контент в несколько раз лучше других дело в том, что мембер редко принимает решение о покупке исключительно рационально на этот пост меня вдохновила только что дочитанная книга думай медленно… решай быстро. в ней рассказывается о том, что большинство наших решений …
custom 547224069823951749511custom 53863762231590018134custom 54742861248746212614
ребята у меня 300 (***** у тракториста) подписчиков как я рада как я радАААА!!!!!!!
custom 540688509142934378612custom 54722406982395174954custom 54742861248746212612
📼📼📼📼📼📼📼📼📼📼📼📼📼 📼📼📼📼📼📼📼📼 📼📼📼📼📼📼📼📼 📼📼📼📼📼📼📼📼 все привет! на мой пост про разбор чатов на самом деле было очень много реакций и я решила рандомно выбрать один чат для разбора (чат очень объемный) но если этот пост положительно законвертится и наберет много реакция, то думаю, что я выберу еще один чат и сделаю вторую часть РАЗБОР ЧАТА МОЕГО ПОДПИСЧИКА сегодня у нас в гостях: @Vivigwap вводные данные о модели: альт гер…
custom 547428612487462126138custom 540688509142934378617custom 547224069823951749515
???
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
а что насчет того чтобы я выбрала несколько чатов своих подписчиков и сделала пост с разбором этих чатов?
почему почти все неправильно понимают ВАЙБ в диалоге? 📼📼📼📼📼📼📼📼📼📼📼📼 я очень часто слышу советы из разряда: НУЖНО СОЗДАВАТЬ ВАЙБ, БУДЬ НА ОДНОЙ ВОЛНЕ, ОБЩАЙСЯ ЛЕГКО. звучит красиво, но проблема в том, что почти никто не объясняет, что вообще такое этот самый вайб из-за всего этого новички начинают думать, что вайб - это когда много шутят, пишут с кучей смайликов, максимально дружелюбные и соглашаются со всем, что …
custom 547428612487462126115custom 538637622315900181312custom 547224069823951749512
꒰ა ☆ ໒꒱ давно обещала вам пост про мои грин-флаги в чаттерах вот как раз руки дошли написать, потому что в голове больше каких-то тем нет… месяц, кстати, был не из лучших…словила небольшое выгорание и дизмораль, но уже пришла в норму и теперь полна новых идей и мотивации! МОИ ГРИН ФЛАГИ В ЧАТТЕРАХ ⊹ ࣪ ˖ желание работать когда я набираю новеньких ребят к себе в команду, одна из самых важных вещей до тестовой смен…
custom 54722406982395174959custom 54068850914293437867custom 54742861248746212617
када нибудь овнеры перестанут меряться хуями и выяснять у кого агенси покруче ребят самое крутое агенси-фарми успокойтесь🙌🏻
custom 54722406982395174956custom 54068850914293437865
ищу секстера 15 лет платить не будем анкета 80% трафф попозже
custom 54722406982395174957
40 скрипичных ключей на новый пост и составляю вам плейлист из моих любимых треков для вайба на сменке
custom 547224069823951749514custom 53863762231590018134custom 54742861248746212614
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @krovotochitt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
???
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2026 to 2 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“nozaza” (@krovotochitt), 350 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/krovotochitt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.