От лаборатории к умным часам: как измерить кортизол Я всё больше убеждаюсь, что одна из самых интересных областей технологий сегодня находится на стыке инженерии, медицины и ИИ. Пока мы обсуждаем новые модели нейросетей, инженеры пытаются решить другую задачу: научить маленький носимый датчик непрерывно измерять гормон стресса прямо на теле человека. Сегодня уровень кортизола определяют по крови, слюне или моче. …

Channel
Sasha Kruasanova PROIT
@kruasanova_as
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,193subscribers
+35 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001713820748 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kruasanova_as |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kruasanova_as |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 12:58 | 2,193 | -5 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 23:37 | 2,198 | -6 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 18:37 | 2,204 | +74 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 17:01 | 2,130 | -6 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:44 | 2,136 | -4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:23 | 2,140 | -7 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:04 | 2,147 | -5 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 02:23 | 2,152 | -6 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 08:13 | 2,158 | +7 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:56 | 2,151 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:22 | 2,152 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:44 | 2,157 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:47 | 2,158 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:59 | 2,158 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 1 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 11m 12s
- Average length
- 1m 24s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
97 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 45 | 46.4% | |
| 🔥 | 23 | 23.7% | |
| 💯 | 9 | 9.28% | |
| 🤣 | 7 | 7.22% | |
| 😍 | 5 | 5.15% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 4.12% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 2.06% | |
| 🤪 | 2 | 2.06% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 97 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kruasanova_as. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Про Макс… Я, кстати, всё ещё им не пользуюсь. Периодически думаю: а не пора ли переводить туда канал? Но потом смотрю на свою аудиторию - и понимаю, что почти все вы пока сидите в ТГ. Поэтому прямо сейчас устраивать великое переселение народов как будто нет смысла. Но вопросов вокруг Макс меньше не становится. Что он собирает? К чему получает доступ? Может ли слушать разговоры? И насколько вообще безопасно устанавл…
Иногда нужен прыжок веры и я его сделала и делаю - во всех смыслах. Очень страшно, но я хочу жить эту жизнь https://t.me/kruasanova_as Все еще пишет сама и надеюсь, что мотивирую вас жить вашу лучшую жизнь #житьжизнь
❤15😍5👍3🔥2💯1
Актуалочка
Про Дурова я в последние пару дней дал несколько комментариев и могу повторить основные мысли и тут, в канале, который ведется в мессенджере, принадлежащем компании, генеральный директор который внесен в список террористов. Можно ли продолжать пользоваться Telegram в этом случае? Я ненастоящий "сварщик", но свое диванное мнение имею. Итак, важно понимать отличие статуса у Дурова и у принадлежащих ему компаний. Это, к…
В продолжение вчерашней темы о безопасности и кибербезопасности гаджетов. Сегодня поговорим об устройствах, пароль от которых точно не хочется однажды увидеть в даркнете. Секс с роботами станет реальностью уже совсем скоро, обещают футурологи. Правда, громкий прогноз о 2030 годе немного исказили: в одном из самых цитируемых исследований футуролог Иэн Пирсон предполагал, что к 2030 году привычным станет виртуальный…
❤1
Атаковать можно не только человека, банк или сервер. Атаковать можно робота. Причём иногда для этого даже не нужно ломать саму систему. Достаточно изменить данные, которые она получает, подменить сигнал или заставить устройство принять неправильное решение. В новом фрагменте подкаста с Алексеем Лукацким говорим о том, зачем вообще взламывать роботов и умные устройства и к чему такие атаки могут привести. Какие а…
❤1🔥1
Теперь Mac поддерживает Windows. Хи-хи Хорошей пятницы и пусть вас тоже кто-то поддерживает https://t.me/kruasanova_as Все еще пишет сама
🤣6🔥4
Ну что, все в таксисты? Новости из мира нейронаук. Учёные проанализировали данные представителей почти 400 профессий и выяснили: реже всего от болезни Альцгеймера умирают таксисты и водители скорой помощи. Нет, дело не в целебном воздействии московских пробок. Просто этим людям постоянно приходится ориентироваться в пространстве, искать новые маршруты, быстро принимать решения и держать в голове карту города. В этот…
🔥2❤1💯1
Знакомо? https://t.me/kruasanova_as Все еще пишет сама и иногда показывает
💯5🤣1
Люди - ленивые жопы? Каждый раз, когда мы открываем новый сайт, приложение или игру, происходит один и тот же ритуал. «Разрешить доступ?» «Принять все cookies?» «Разрешить отслеживание?» «Предоставить доступ к геолокации, контактам, камере, микрофону?» И знаете, что делает большинство людей? Нажимает «Принять». Даже не читая. Почему? Потому что мы не ленивые. Мы экономные. Наш мозг постоянно пытается снизить количест…
❤5
Video, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kruasanova_as. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@goonweekend · 25,801
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sasha Kruasanova PROIT” (@kruasanova_as), 2,193 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kruasanova_as.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.