Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Krueger's Degen Hub ⚔️

Channel

Krueger's Degen Hub ⚔️

@kruegerdegen

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

617subscribers

-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001406774426
TypeChannel
Username@kruegerdegen
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 November 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/kruegerdegen

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

617626621.57 August 2026 — 626 subscribers7 August 2026 — 626 subscribers23 August 2026 — 624 subscribers29 August 2026 — 620 subscribers5 September 2026 — 617 subscribers7 August 20265 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 30 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 616–627 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 23:02617-3
29 Aug 2026, 13:53620-4
23 Aug 2026, 06:13624-2
7 Aug 2026, 23:03626no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:16626first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

6 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
350.0%
🔥233.3%
🤩116.7%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 23:58 UTC21 viewsread 7 August 2026

Marketing campaign begins very soon. 📷 The quiet building phase is nearly over. We’ve been putting in a huge amount of work behind the scenes to make sure we’re in the strongest position possible before we really ramp things up. Lens has always been about building long-term utility, and we’re only just getting started. 14k mc 7FinZs9DTvrqQ55iRcoqcwGyTJK14v65wPJsLNoepump t.me/LensProjectSOL

Signed @KruegerCalls

27 Jul 2026, 00:19 UTC31 viewsread 7 August 2026

New callers are being onboarded this week along with alot more bullish news. 📷 Going to make $LENS a Solana project that everyone will remember. Worked on this for a while now and the foundation is well & truly set, it’s time to get moving properly. 7FinZs9DTvrqQ55iRcoqcwGyTJK14v65wPJsLNoepump t.me/LensProjectSOL

Signed @KruegerCalls

26 Jul 2026, 22:01 UTC29 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

Calling the bottom here at 10k mc. 📷 Been building $LENS since day one, never stopped and i'm continuing to work regardless of any situation we're in. This past week I've been heads down - rebuilding infrastructure, slashing costs, fixing every broken piece of the bot and adding new features. This week there is going to be some serious progress made. Lens Bot is back online properly, tighter than ever. Smarter sig

Signed @KruegerCalls

9 Jul 2026, 17:11 UTC57 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Dog In Hood did 10m on Robinhood recently… Let’s see how Blob In Hood can do. Still low cap at 15k and I think they getting some callers soon. Let’s see! 👀

🤩1

Signed @KruegerCalls

9 Jul 2026, 17:03 UTC48 viewsread 7 August 2026

Blob In Hood | $BLOB My first gamble on Robinhood chain, little spin off of all the runners like Dog In Hood etc. Blobfish is a famous fish that went viral all over the internet not long ago, this is the first Blob In Hood on this chain so it's an OG. Hoping it can be a runner for us all, graphics are funny and has the potential to do well. Let's see 7.5k mcap 0xf114F407F4BF9759cCD9bf80F203a180982005B2 x.com/T

Signed @KruegerCalls

7 Jul 2026, 01:29 UTC52 viewsread 7 August 2026

Definitely a wild ride on this one so far but with the Bull meta going on currently, I genuinely do think the lore is solid and it stands a chance at sending back up. - Safemoon went to 17 billion back in the day - Hank (who’s endorsed $SFB was a developer on the core team of SafeMoon) - SafeMoon X follow his account still after 5 years - He holds 55% of SafeBull and has already agreed he won’t be touching it, as-we

Signed @KruegerCalls

6 Jul 2026, 23:01 UTC58 viewsread 7 August 2026

Aped dip here, had a massive dump but it was just holders following the red. Team still holding all their supply and Hank the SafeMoon Team member is fully onboard and discussing next moves including a X space sometime soon aswell. It's the first coin he's endorsed within this meta, and the only one he will be supporting like this. Think a nice reversal from here is very possible, $ANSEM dipped to same mcap as it is

Signed @KruegerCalls

6 Jul 2026, 21:52 UTC44 viewsread 7 August 2026

SafeBull combines the OG concept of "DeFi" with the new, tending to both sets of onboarding, whilst donating proceeds to the developer who made DeFi what it is today... This project is about giving the recognition Hankusun truly deserves with what he did with safemoon 100% Fee's and 55% supply will be donated to the wallet the 1/3 core team member of Safemoon gives, if he decides to onboard the project. He's never e

Signed @KruegerCalls

6 Jul 2026, 16:55 UTC37 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

This should be launching tonight and it’s sounding like it could be a big one. 👀 Team is looking to connect with a dev from one of the biggest DeFi coins in history and will be potentially getting them onboarded, they have sources that are close with the said individual so the chances of it happening are pretty high. If they’re successful, it’s gonna seriously pop off. Locked and loaded for this one… Stay posted 🚨

1🔥1

Signed @KruegerCalls

5 Jul 2026, 17:15 UTC36 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Searching for more plays 🔭 Got word that there could be a new one coming tonight, yesterday I posted a 16x so I’m looking to repeat that again but better… Keep notifications on, will always do my best to post plays at lowest cap possible 🔔 - @KruegerCallz 😈

1🔥1

Signed @KruegerCalls

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kruegerdegen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Krueger's Degen Hub ⚔️” (@kruegerdegen), 617 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kruegerdegen.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.