Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ksemetiks

Channel

ksemetiks

@ksemetiks

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

25,302subscribers

-415 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002428239809
TypeChannel
Username@ksemetiks
DescriptionБьюти-канал с моими рекомендациями ❤️ Предложения по рекламе: [email protected] @digital_daria https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/67cfa3e239842d08bc3453e4
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ksemetiks

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

25,30225,78325,542.512 August 2026 — 25,717 subscribers13 August 2026 — 25,718 subscribers14 August 2026 — 25,741 subscribers16 August 2026 — 25,747 subscribers17 August 2026 — 25,779 subscribers18 August 2026 — 25,783 subscribers19 August 2026 — 25,779 subscribers20 August 2026 — 25,765 subscribers21 August 2026 — 25,750 subscribers22 August 2026 — 25,710 subscribers24 August 2026 — 25,663 subscribers25 August 2026 — 25,630 subscribers26 August 2026 — 25,613 subscribers27 August 2026 — 25,604 subscribers28 August 2026 — 25,588 subscribers29 August 2026 — 25,568 subscribers30 August 2026 — 25,567 subscribers31 August 2026 — 25,559 subscribers1 September 2026 — 25,541 subscribers2 September 2026 — 25,538 subscribers4 September 2026 — 25,505 subscribers6 September 2026 — 25,479 subscribers10 September 2026 — 25,437 subscribers12 September 2026 — 25,400 subscribers13 September 2026 — 25,372 subscribers15 September 2026 — 25,339 subscribers17 September 2026 — 25,302 subscribers12 August 202617 September 2026
27 measurements spanning 36 days, net -415. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,230–25,855 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 12:1725,302-37
15 Sept 2026, 13:2025,339-33
13 Sept 2026, 23:5925,372-28
12 Sept 2026, 07:2125,400-37
10 Sept 2026, 05:4025,437-42
6 Sept 2026, 22:2125,479-26
4 Sept 2026, 05:2025,505-33
2 Sept 2026, 17:1425,538-3
1 Sept 2026, 16:2425,541-18
31 Aug 2026, 14:5425,559-8
30 Aug 2026, 17:1325,567-1
29 Aug 2026, 20:2825,568-20
28 Aug 2026, 17:1325,588-16
27 Aug 2026, 19:5225,604-9
26 Aug 2026, 20:0825,613-17
25 Aug 2026, 16:4825,630-33
24 Aug 2026, 14:4425,663-47
22 Aug 2026, 21:4425,710-40
21 Aug 2026, 12:3625,750-15
20 Aug 2026, 14:1725,765first reading

Engagement

48 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 43 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
57.0%
avg views ÷ 25,302 subscribers
Avg views / post
14,400
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.69%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 48 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026
Posts held48 (23 July 2026 – 23 September 2026)
Views total187,500
Reactions total6,920
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken26 Sept 2026, 22:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
283
Videos
23
Links
15

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 08s
Average length
34s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

30,076 reactions across 48 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤19,68465.4%
❤‍🔥2,8049.32%
💘2,3407.78%
🔥1,4414.79%
😭9663.21%
😱5261.75%
👍4311.43%
🥰3421.14%
💋3000.997%
🍓2650.881%
💅1910.635%
😍1820.605%
👎1500.499%
🍾1120.372%
🙈1040.346%
💔900.299%
🌚270.09%
😘220.073%
😎200.066%
🕊190.063%
9 further kinds600.199%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 48 of the 48 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30,076 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Sept 2026, 15:37 UTC≈10,300 views617 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

запах✨😍

❤‍🔥374❤166💋40💘22🔥5😍4👍3👎2

23 Sept 2026, 15:36 UTC≈10,400 views502 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤371🔥55🥰39❤‍🔥19💘9👍3💋2😍2

20 Sept 2026, 13:06 UTC≈15,900 views734 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

помыла кисти в прошлый раз когда собирала кисточки обратно, уронила кисть из кварца Manly pro и она разбилась( в этот раз подумала, что нужно это делать на кровати чтобы ничего не упало. но Лова взяла задачу на себя. выбрала ТАКУЮ ЖЕ новую кисть Manly pro и разбила ее…. я больше не куплю эту кисточку очень красивая, но не практичная😭

❤450😭208💋49💘10❤‍🔥5🥰4🔥3👍2

19 Sept 2026, 12:22 UTC≈12,600 views587 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤422❤‍🔥71🔥51💘22👍8👎5🍓3😍2

19 Sept 2026, 12:21 UTC≈12,100 views507 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤377💘70🔥36👍10❤‍🔥6👎3😍2🎉1

18 Sept 2026, 14:26 UTC≈13,600 views529 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

может кто то уже пробовал, напишите как вам🫶🏼

❤388💘87🔥29❤‍🔥14👍4💋3😍2🎉1

18 Sept 2026, 14:25 UTC≈11,700 views412 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤302🥰40🔥33💘15❤‍🔥11🍓3👍3😍3

18 Sept 2026, 14:24 UTC≈11,400 views451 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤322💘52🥰36🔥20❤‍🔥9👎3😍3🍓2

18 Sept 2026, 14:24 UTC≈12,300 views523 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤386🥰55💘40❤‍🔥19🔥6💋5🍓3🤩3

14 Sept 2026, 09:56 UTC≈18,100 views264 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

Сегодня для кого-то точно будет отличный день 😁 Хотя бы потому, что сейчас я поделюсь тем, за что многие когда-то платили деньги! Это куча вспомогательного материала от онлайн школы НОО для подготовки к экзаменам совершенно бесплатно, а именно 2140 страниц конспектов, шпор, удобно разбитых по темам. Наверное, это самый лучший подарок для ученика в начале учебного года, чтобы он или она могли без спешки начать подг…

❤198🔥31👍16❤‍🔥11💘4👎2😍1🙈1

7 Sept 2026, 13:09 UTC≈18,000 views497 reactionsread 26 September 2026

Отзыв на румяна Catrice 💋 Плюсы: • Легко растушёвываются и мягко ложатся на кожу. • Приятный, освежающий оттенок, который мгновенно освежает лицо. Минусы: • Слишком маслянистая текстура. Из-за этого продукт плохо держится в упаковке и буквально «мигрирует» по ней.

❤368💘68❤‍🔥34🔥9💋8👍3😍3👎2

7 Sept 2026, 12:54 UTC≈19,000 views572 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

❤410❤‍🔥81💘54🔥7👍6👎5💅3💋2

Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @ksemetiks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Jul 2026, 10:47 UTCAnonymous Poll3,810 voters approx.

⬇️⬇️

  1. черные звездочки ✨32%
  2. красные❤️53%
  3. бордовые звездочки ✨22%
  4. свой вариант в комментариях👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼4%

The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 23 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ksemetiks” (@ksemetiks), 25,302 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ksemetiks.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.