Channel
@kshanispeaks
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
230subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002056429705 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kshanispeaks |
| Description | Менеджмент айти-продуктов, маркетинг, музыка и ржака Product Manager MR Group; Product Marketer @zvuk_sound; Co-founder @unipropriate Связь @kshaniami |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kshanispeaks |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 21:22 | 230 | no change |
| 12 Sept 2026, 20:47 | 230 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
299 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 146 | 48.8% | |
| custom 5256199887585840801 | 48 | 16.1% | |
| custom 5255882068595873377 | 42 | 14.0% | |
| custom 5255869248118493105 | 40 | 13.4% | |
| custom 5256149627878543125 | 23 | 7.69% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 299 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 January 2026 to 29 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Подскажите курсы / школы / преподавателей / ресурсы для изучения немецкого, пожалуйста! Можно с русского, можно с английского, в приоритете онлайн-формат, но можно и офлайн в Питере Любые советы помогут!
❤14custom 52561496278785431253custom 52561998875858408012
Обход блокировок интернет-сервисов как образ жизни
❤25custom 52561998875858408018custom 52558692481184931056
Говорят ли люди про «хорошее» и «плохое» по-разному? Неа 🚫 По-крайней мере, статзначимости нет: три теста (Z-тест, Mann-Whitney U, хи-квадрат) дали одинаковый результат Все еще есть кое-что интересное — направление эффекта* разное: в музыке хорошее признают чуть чаще, чем плохое (+1.2%), а в кино — наоборот (−2.8%) 🙃 *Если допускаем, что эффект все таки есть и мне просто не хватило выборки Думал чето доказать, а…
❤16
Существует объективно хорошее кино
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Существует объективно хорошая музыка
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Существует объективно плохое кино
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Существует объективно плохая музыка
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Есть что-то, что хочется узнать о звуке и музыке не у чатагпт? Куча лет звукорежиссуры за плечами, а сейчас в работе редко эти навыки и знания применяю. Давайте буду делиться🎸 😀
custom 525586924811849310513custom 52558820685958733776❤1
Почему мы смотрим фильмы с субтитрами (даже если знаем язык) С короткими видео понятно — там есть запрос на "посмотреть без звука". А в кино опять решает динамический диапазон: 1 // Кинотеатры раньше не сильно отличались от телевизоров у вас дома — в том смысле, что звук в них был устроен очень просто: два канала, лево и право, простые колонки 2 // Потом умные ребята придумали новые конфиги и аудиосистемы — пятика…
❤17custom 525588206859587337712custom 52561496278785431255custom 52561998875858408011
В последнюю неделю с интернетом в Питере особенный пиздец — причем что с мобильным, что с вайфаем. Почти невозможно нормально работать 💻 Мне в работе очень часто нужны НЕ российские IP — а все популярные решения, в том числе платные, заметно разваливаются под натиском РКН (дорогие боты, которые налетят спамить свои ВПН-с-монетизацей-точно-не-через-продажу-приватных-данных.рф в комменты, не утруждайтесь, я все удалю)…
custom 525619988758584080116
Вы празднуете / поздравляете с 23 февраля?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Комягина не стало :( Спасибо за вкус и смелость
custom 525614962787854312514
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kshanispeaks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Существует объективно хорошее кино
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Существует объективно хорошая музыка
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Существует объективно плохое кино
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Существует объективно плохая музыка
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Вы празднуете / поздравляете с 23 февраля?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Как вы относитесь к 14 февраля?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 January 2026 to 29 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Никита Кшáни” (@kshanispeaks), 230 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kshanispeaks.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.