Those Who Take The Rulers As Lords Besides Allah | Abu Hanzala Back up channel: https://t.me/kufrbittaghut2
❤7

Channel
@kufrbittaghut1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,259subscribers
+27 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001650641038 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kufrbittaghut1 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kufrbittaghut1 |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 00:01 | 4,259 | +8 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 14:18 | 4,251 | +4 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 03:15 | 4,247 | +4 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 03:37 | 4,243 | +1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:43 | 4,242 | +5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:27 | 4,237 | +6 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:53 | 4,231 | +1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:43 | 4,230 | +4 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 07:33 | 4,226 | -4 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:58 | 4,230 | +11 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:33 | 4,219 | -8 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:41 | 4,227 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:55 | 4,233 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:01 | 4,232 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
396 reactions across 21 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 275 | 69.4% | |
| 😡 | 64 | 16.2% | |
| 💔 | 57 | 14.4% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 396 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Those Who Take The Rulers As Lords Besides Allah | Abu Hanzala Back up channel: https://t.me/kufrbittaghut2
❤7
Saudi Preacher Khalid Al-Rashid's Imprisonment Marks 20 Years Sheikh Khalid Al-Rashid, who called for protests against the insulting cartoons depicting the Prophet (SAW) published in Denmark in 2005, was arrested by the Saudi authorities on charges of inciting fitnah. Born in 1970, Khalid Al-Rashid was arrested in Mecca in 2006 while performing Umrah and subsequently imprisoned. It is reported that he has been subj…
💔38❤5
🔴 The funerals of 112 bodies, extracted from the rubble of the residential block struck by Israel in Gaza's Sabra neighborhood on November 22, 2023. Approximately three years after the attack have been held. 308 people lost their lives in the attack. "If the dead had been someone who perished for insulting the Messenger of Allah, all the world’s leaders would gather, speaking of peace, brotherhood, and condemning t…
❤12😡3
Answering the doubts of Irja: The Dhat Anwat Incident What is the 'Dhat Anwat Incident'? Dhat Anwat was a tree which the polytheists of Mecca hung their swords and sought blessings from the tree prior to war. This was their tradition. In a hadith one of the companions asked the Prophet (SAW) to build one like it, to which the Prophet responded: “Allahu Akbar! What you have said is just like what the Children of I…
❤3
The Hadith of the Ashes This hadith has no connection to the claim that ignorance can excuse shirk. The expression "لَئِنْ قَدَرَ عَلَيَّ" does not mean "if Allah has power over me". In Arabic, it can mean to restrain or rigorous questioning. The Qur’an uses the same wording regarding Yunus (AS): فَظَنَّ أَن لَّن نَّقْدِرَ عَلَيْهِ "And ˹remember˺ when the Man of the Whale stormed off ˹from his city˺ in a rage, …
❤5
Is There Excuse of Ignorance For People Who Commit Shirk | Abu Hanzala Back up channel: https://t.me/kufrbittaghut2
❤3
Just when you thought it couldn't get worse
😡10
More disgrace from these so-called du'at. This time with a Christian who goes by "Godlogic Apologetics" on YouTube. The guy he is smiling and posing with insults Allah and His Messenger. It's not haram to debate with disbelievers, but this type of friendly demeanor with people who insult Allah and the Prophet is not only disgraceful but it's also the type of wala' that endangers one's religion (if Sheikh Uthman ibn…
😡31❤5
Ibn al-Jawzi said: "My advice to you is this: never grow weary of sending blessings upon Muhammad (SAW). Whoever frequently sends blessings upon him, hoping for Allah's favour, Allah will aid him through His subtle kindness and gracious favour." 📚 Bustān al-Wāʿiẓīn
❤24
Our sisters in Roj protesting the frequent raids by the Kurdish forces. To speak out against what is happening in Gaza but to turn blind eye to what is happening in al-Hol, Roj, Rosafa and others is nothing but hypocrisy. No one will publicise the oppression happening in those camps. Why? Are they not women and children? Just as we pray for those in Gaza, we pray for them too. Just as Gazans need aid, so do the si…
❤29💔13
Subhanallah! The so-called dawah scene of the coconuts is an utter disgrace. The guy in the back, for those who don't know, is David Wood. A Zionist Christian who insulted the Prophet (SAW) countless times, who ripped pages of the Quran, burned the Quran did every possible thing to insult Allah, His Messenger, the wife of the Messenger and the Muslims. Like that's not enough, he supports the mass murder carried out …
😡19❤3
Wiping Over Socks For Wudhu & Its Conditions The fact that the Prophet (SAW) wiped over socks and commanded people to wipe over socks has reached the level of mutawatir. Because of this, when you open books of aqeedah you will find statements such as, "We wipe over socks." What place does the issue of wiping over socks have in books of aqeedah? It is because this matter has been transmitted by tawatur, and since the…
❤14
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @kufrbittaghut1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Archive of Tawheed” (@kufrbittaghut1), 4,259 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kufrbittaghut1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.