Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for kulyok shurshit

Channel

kulyok shurshit

@kulchevichwork

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

98subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002003433437
TypeChannel
Username@kulchevichwork
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/kulchevichwork

Growth

9599978 August 2026 — 95 subscribers9 August 2026 — 95 subscribers25 August 2026 — 96 subscribers31 August 2026 — 98 subscribers10 September 2026 — 99 subscribers18 September 2026 — 98 subscribers988 August 202618 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 41 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 94–100 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 21:4098-1
10 Sept 2026, 18:1599+1
31 Aug 2026, 22:2598+2
25 Aug 2026, 04:4596+1
9 Aug 2026, 12:4795no change
8 Aug 2026, 17:1595first reading

Engagement

4 posts held, back to 11 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

50 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53617264609544355082652.0%
custom 53618703079991112451326.0%
custom 5361976213302695130816.0%
custom 536161752340394055536.00%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Jul 2026, 09:43 UTC49 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Как же меня прёт от этих сюжетов! Отдать контроль судьбе — иногда и правда лучшее решение.

custom 53617264609544355086custom 53619762133026951303custom 53618703079991112452

16 Jul 2026, 09:11 UTC92 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Недавно я увидел Reels про Дайдо Морияму и понял, почему меня так притягивает стрит-фотография. Наверное, это связано с моим детством. Мы выросли на улице: исследовали заброшки, гуляли целыми днями и просто жили моментом. Без стремления к идеальной картинке. Думаю, поэтому мне так близка честность уличной фотографии. В подходе Мориямы мне нравится простая мысль: не нужно ждать идеальных условий — достаточно взять к

custom 53619762133026951305custom 53617264609544355083

11 Jul 2026, 10:46 UTC104 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Тоже из недавних скетчей

custom 53617264609544355089custom 53618703079991112456

11 Jul 2026, 10:39 UTC81 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Я вот тут скидываю свои задания, но никогда не рассказываю, как именно я их выполняю. Не знаю, насколько это нужно, конечно, но вот недавно делал задание и решил рассказать про этапы. (Это всего один способ из кучи имеющихся.)

custom 53617264609544355088custom 53618703079991112455custom 53616175234039405553

Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @kulchevichwork. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“kulyok shurshit” (@kulchevichwork), 98 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kulchevichwork.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.