hai momons, ajakin kita sfs yuk @moncapbot <3

Channel
kumons! :o
@kumons
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
53subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001631947235 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kumons |
| Description | 🎐 ࣪. beowulf connoisseurs hieroglyphically emits grundleaslic amphitheater erstwhile synchronizing itsy-bitsy catto mneomically amongst xeir remembrances bureaucracy munchkins wholeheartedly: @monchieve @moncapbot well-cherished! ♡꒰៸៸´˘`៸៸꒱ ࣪ ୨୧ ࣪. |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 29 August 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kumons |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:30 | 53 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:41 | 53 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 29 August 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 December 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 9
- Videos
- 8
- Links
- 2
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 51s
- Average length
- 13s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
85 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 31 | 36.5% | |
| 🥰 | 20 | 23.5% | |
| 🎉 | 18 | 21.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 8.24% | |
| 🐳 | 4 | 4.71% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 3.53% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.18% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 1.18% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 85reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 August 2022 to 27 December 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Kita belum terima sfs dulu ya, momonss
❤1
heyyo, kita cudah ada hilal mau hidup kembali
🎉4
Momons, kangen🫠🫠
❤🔥5🥰2
Doain kumons balik aktif lagi huwhshwhhs
❤3
Kangen juga sender :(
Hai dedek meong, semangat jangan loyo loyo lagi. Kangen liat interaksi kalian dichannel @kumons
❤🔥2
KANGEN BANGETTT
Hai momons.. long time no see
Hai momons, kangen kita gak sih??
🐳4🥰4
Sticker, posted without a caption
hello-hello! momons kangen banget :( but sadly kumons might be memasuki fase long rest karena banyak yang dari membernya sudah masuk ke fase cibuk,,, huhuhuhu kami tutup sfs dan fw poster dulu ya! jangan di unsubs bagi mutual karena bisa aja nanti pas back langsung debut :d hehehehe. much love fromus guysguys! -3-
❤18🎉2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @kumons. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,200,724 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@monchieve · 517 postsSchool Archive
@izschoolchive · 97 posts𝐀𝐯𝐚𝐥𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐡𝐞 𝐨'𝐭𝐡 𝐇𝐞𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐞𝐧𝐭.
@Avalechest · 606 postsDrivethrough Archive
@drivearchive · 46 posts𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗢𝗹𝗱𝗱𝗼𝘀
@TheOlddos · 616 postsDriveThrough Archive.
@DitiArchives · 34 posts𝗗𝗲𝗺𝗶𝘂𝗿𝗴𝗲 𝗦𝗮𝗻𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗮𝗿𝘆
@Demiurgest · 1153 postsKetiga Files
@KetigaFiles · 42 postsThe Sample of L’Art Sauvagè
@SauvageSample · 52 postsThe Herritage of Joseon.
@TheJoseonHerritage · 22 postsBuku harian, Tinamiks
@Tmixxtape · 42 postsBarbie Chaewon
@BarbieChaewon · 1031 postWeDrim Archive.
@DreamiesArchives · 41 postEGO CHEMIST
@egochemist · 3001 postYejity’s files
@Yeejity · 21 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“kumons! :o” (@kumons), 53 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kumons.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.