Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Kus-Kus Racing

Channel

Kus-Kus Racing

@kuskusracing

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,447subscribers

-23 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001706243187
TypeChannel
Username@kuskusracing
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/kuskusracing

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

13,44613,47713,461.57 August 2026 — 13,470 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,470 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,471 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,467 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,458 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,454 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,453 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,454 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,455 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,457 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,456 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,459 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,464 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,461 subscribers22 August 2026 — 13,468 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,477 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,471 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,470 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,471 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,472 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,460 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,462 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,460 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,456 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,455 subscribers4 September 2026 — 13,452 subscribers6 September 2026 — 13,446 subscribers10 September 2026 — 13,451 subscribers12 September 2026 — 13,447 subscribers13,4477 August 202612 September 2026
29 measurements spanning 36 days, net -23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,441–13,482 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 08:4213,447-4
10 Sept 2026, 02:3713,451+5
6 Sept 2026, 22:5713,446-6
4 Sept 2026, 08:5513,452-3
2 Sept 2026, 22:2813,455-1
1 Sept 2026, 23:3413,456-4
1 Sept 2026, 01:4613,460-2
30 Aug 2026, 23:1313,462+2
29 Aug 2026, 23:0413,460-12
28 Aug 2026, 21:5413,472+1
27 Aug 2026, 21:2513,471+1
26 Aug 2026, 18:0513,470-1
25 Aug 2026, 19:2313,471-6
24 Aug 2026, 15:5413,477+9
22 Aug 2026, 23:1713,468+7
21 Aug 2026, 16:1913,461-3
20 Aug 2026, 16:3413,464+5
19 Aug 2026, 19:0713,459+3
18 Aug 2026, 18:1813,456-1
17 Aug 2026, 20:2413,457first reading

Engagement

81 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
35.4%
avg views ÷ 13,447 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,760
47 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.97%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
49
of 81 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held81 (28 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total223,770
Reactions total4,417
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 20:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 53s
Average length
2m 53s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

7,041 reactions across 79 posts, in 44 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,91041.3%
😁1,08815.5%
🔥99914.2%
👍4947.02%
🤣2974.22%
💩2493.54%
😢2433.45%
👎1321.87%
😭971.38%
💊721.02%
🫡600.852%
😨550.781%
💔520.739%
🍌500.71%
❤‍🔥450.639%
🥴400.568%
🤯230.327%
😴190.27%
🎉170.241%
👏150.213%
24 further kinds841.19%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 79 of the 81 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,041 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 81 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 79 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kuskusracing. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 81 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 17:16 UTC≈1,650 views21 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Спасибо за советы, я когда вернулся Братан уже все починил там 😅 Продолжаем тесты Р16 Ультра в Ирке! PS: если силы останутся то ближе к 23-00 ЗОМБОЙД СТРИМ ЗАПУЩЕН! 📱 ЮТУБ 📱 ТВИЧ 📱 ВК ПЛЕЙ

🔥192

2 Sept 2026, 14:42 UTC≈2,310 views98 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🤣7810🔥7💊2👎1

2 Sept 2026, 10:22 UTC≈2,920 views45 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Лоб в ЛОБ! Сравниваю свою р16 с р16 Ултра! Сейчас ЛМУ, вечером Ирка и ночью может быть ЗОМБОЙД! СТРИМ ЗАПЩЕН! 📱 ЮТУБ 📱 ТВИЧ 📱 ВК ПЛЕЙ

34🔥8💊2👎1

1 Sept 2026, 11:42 UTC≈3,480 views51 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Да кому нужны эти часовы гонки на 10 человек то?! Или я что то НЕ ПОНИМАЮ?! СТРИМ ЗАПУЩЕН! 📱 ЮТУБ 📱 ТВИЧ 📱 ВК ПЛЕЙ

😁3610👎4💊1

1 Sept 2026, 09:38 UTC≈3,590 views53 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Кажется я поторопился с покупкой CS Pro и вот сейчас задумываюсь его продать и вернуться на RS. Почему? Выглядит CS Pro здорово, куча кнопок, нет шва который натерает но…понимаешь что эта куча кнопок и крутилок мне не нужна от слова совсем! В овалах? Да там ни трекшена ни АБС. В ралли?! Та же история) В аркадах? Мысли такие - CS Pro отличное решение если у вас универсальный кругляш для всего. Но когда у вас есть н

42👍6😁3👎1🔥1

1 Sept 2026, 06:43 UTC≈3,660 views94 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Это самый страшный кругляш! Там ещё заглушка есть 🫣 При этом другие рули особенно Порше и Мустанг выглядят очень круто 🤤 Ну а вишенка на торте…мне че игру Ride качать?! 😅

🔥776💊4👍3👎2🍾1🥴1

31 Aug 2026, 14:17 UTC≈3,900 views82 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Хьюстон, у нас проблема... | Gran Turismo 7 Супермощные КОРВЕТЫ и очень странные Овалы в GT7 📱 СМОТРЕТЬ НА ЮТУБ 📱 СМОТРЕТЬ В ВК ВИДЕО

65👏6😁6👍2👎2💊1

31 Aug 2026, 14:16 UTC≈3,800 views75 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Мой монтажер Кирюха опять упоролся и мы кажется немного увлеклись 😅 Новый выпуск по DLC в Gran Turismo 7 но решили перед каждой гонкой немного рассказать про машину на которой я поеду, вышло круто как по мне. Это кусочек из видоса ну а полный видос в посте ниже 👇👇👇

56🔥11😁4👍2👎1🙉1

29 Aug 2026, 15:44 UTC≈4,460 views213 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

😁14837🔥24🥰2👎1🤣1

29 Aug 2026, 15:39 UTC≈4,720 views143 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

114😴19🔥7❤‍🔥2👎1

29 Aug 2026, 15:24 UTC≈4,640 views106 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

80😁17🔥6👎2🙏1

29 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC≈4,140 views117 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

86👍25👎51

Showing the 12 most recent of 81 posts we hold for @kuskusracing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Aug 2026, 07:16 UTCAnonymous Poll733 voters

Как вам вчерашний СПЕШЛ аук? Оставляем на след четверг на аук за баллы?

  1. Херня. Лучше обычный26%
  2. Оставь, было весело53%
  3. Оставь, но убери х0 и поставь х0,535%

The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 81 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Гаснут Огни
@f1alexeypopov · 108,745
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Kus-Kus Racing” (@kuskusracing), 13,447 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kuskusracing.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.