Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Мудрый Куст

Channel

Мудрый Куст

@kusttan

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

492subscribers

+19 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003411035877
TypeChannel
Username@kusttan
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/kusttan

Growth

471492481.510 August 2026 — 473 subscribers10 August 2026 — 473 subscribers16 August 2026 — 471 subscribers23 August 2026 — 474 subscribers29 August 2026 — 476 subscribers8 September 2026 — 479 subscribers15 September 2026 — 492 subscribers10 August 202615 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 37 days, net +19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 468–495 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 18:19492+13
8 Sept 2026, 10:21479+3
29 Aug 2026, 19:47476+2
23 Aug 2026, 08:55474+3
16 Aug 2026, 17:36471-2
10 Aug 2026, 03:31473no change
10 Aug 2026, 01:16473first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

746 reactions across 18 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12917.3%
🍓11114.9%
🔥9312.5%
custom 5379727338906857312658.71%
custom 5474646180572990645597.91%
custom 5474334417486908341577.64%
💘516.84%
😨395.23%
❤‍🔥354.69%
🙏344.56%
🤯222.95%
custom 5379977920183806931141.88%
custom 5240342447422219303121.61%
😭60.804%
👀50.67%
👨‍💻40.536%
😍30.402%
💋20.268%
😱20.268%
🤗20.268%
1 further kind10.134%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 746 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 22:06 UTC56 views17 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Один краше другого

🍓9💘53

Signed Kust_Tan (he/his)

9 Aug 2026, 21:23 UTC87 views34 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Осторожно гуро. Прям вообще лютое, я срз слабонервным не смотреть. Трупы гниль разложение Я так всех пп растеряю

🙏16custom 54743344174869083416custom 54746461805729906456😍3🍓1💘1😱1

Signed Kust_Tan (he/his)

9 Aug 2026, 20:22 UTC104 views23 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Ну всяко краше оригинала

🙏134🍓3👨‍💻2💘1

Signed Kust_Tan (he/his)

9 Aug 2026, 18:37 UTC135 views22 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

"вам может пп живые нужны" А потом говорите что рабство отменили

19custom 54743344174869083412custom 53799779201838069311

Signed Kust_Tan (he/his)

9 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC150 views26 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Что у ориг арта Что у перерисовки клином стоит вопрос А какую собственно эмоцию юзать... Во многом я не знаю какое настроение должно быть у работы, кроме как то что она должна была быть "некомфортной"

15💘7🔥4

Signed Kust_Tan (he/his)

9 Aug 2026, 12:30 UTC171 views38 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Давно гуро не рисовал—

custom 537972733890685731221custom 54746461805729906457custom 547433441748690834161👀1💘1😱1

Signed Kust_Tan (he/his)

9 Aug 2026, 10:34 UTC172 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @shitpostKusta

Я почитал умные мысли в твт... И вообще ещё один тейк чисто мой НО ПВ чем-то похож на Кейна из уцц. Оба персонажа пытались сделать "как лучше", при это НЕОСОЗНАННО(это важно) игнорировали чувства близких людей, из-за чего те страдали. Причём заканчивается арка обоих тоже одинаково. Их кроют матом, потому что те ничего не понимают И повторюсь тк в уцц повествование и восприятие у нас шло со стороны людей(грубо говор

custom 537997792018380693192custom 54743344174869083412🔥1

Signed Kust_Tan (he/his)

8 Aug 2026, 20:03 UTC192 views17 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Posted without readable text

💘11🍓3💋2🔥1

Signed Kust_Tan (he/his)

7 Aug 2026, 20:23 UTC237 views34 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Хк на тату двух дебиков Ну вообще это канон ау, просто мне лень рисовать всё это

custom 547464618057299064515custom 54743344174869083418custom 537972733890685731271🍓1🔥1😨1

Signed Kust_Tan (he/his)

7 Aug 2026, 14:46 UTC236 views80 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Вот ещё фаунт версия

🔥3513custom 547464618057299064513custom 53797273389068573128🍓3custom 53799779201838069313custom 54743344174869083413❤‍🔥2

Signed Kust_Tan (he/his)

7 Aug 2026, 12:42 UTC237 views75 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Решил в цвете сделать Моя сладенькая женатая парочка

34🍓12❤‍🔥11custom 53797273389068573125🔥3custom 54743344174869083413custom 54746461805729906453💘2

Signed Kust_Tan (he/his)

7 Aug 2026, 11:44 UTC235 views42 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

МадленЭспрессо дождутся арта, а пока немного контента с их фанкидом. У Бискотти (сына МадленЭспрессо) были хорошие задатки и талант к изучению кофейной магии. В будущем он даже получит признание за свои исследования, но для отца навсегда останется делитантом и извращенцем, тк его горе сынок додумается использовать кофейню магию в рыцарском ремесле

💘18custom 537972733890685731213🔥82🍓1

Signed Kust_Tan (he/his)

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @kusttan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мудрый Куст” (@kusttan), 492 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kusttan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.