Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for π’Œπ’–π’—π’—π’Šπ’” | 𝒉𝒖𝒅𝒖𝒕𝒔𝒖𝒛 𝒔𝒆𝒗𝒅𝒂 🀎

Channel

π’Œπ’–π’—π’—π’Šπ’” | 𝒉𝒖𝒅𝒖𝒕𝒔𝒖𝒛 𝒔𝒆𝒗𝒅𝒂 🀎

@kuvvis

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry

364subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 13 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002110908610
TypeChannel
Username@kuvvis
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 September 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/kuvvis

Growth

36413 Sept 2026, 21:22 β€” 364 subscribers15 Sept 2026, 06:01 β€” 364 subscribers13 Sept 2026, 21:2215 Sept 2026, 06:01
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 363–365 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 06:01364no change
13 Sept 2026, 21:22364first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 7 July 2025 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β€” we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
40s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β€” not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no β‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

99 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀5656.6%
πŸ’”1919.2%
❀‍πŸ”₯88.08%
🀣55.05%
πŸ₯°55.05%
πŸ•Š33.03%
πŸ’˜11.01%
πŸ”₯11.01%
😭11.01%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 99 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2025 to 17 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Sept 2025, 18:37 UTCβ‰ˆ4,480 views12 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Photo

β€”πŸ˜πŸ˜

❀9πŸ’”3

11 Aug 2025, 16:55 UTCβ‰ˆ4,010 views5 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Video

β€”Π·Π°ΠΊΠ°Π΄Ρ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΅

❀4πŸ’˜1

7 Aug 2025, 15:56 UTCβ‰ˆ3,670 views11 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Video

β€”πŸ˜­πŸ˜­

🀣5πŸ’”3❀2😭1

7 Aug 2025, 09:56 UTCβ‰ˆ3,260 views4 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Photo

β€”ΡΡŠΡ‘ΠΌΠΊΠΈ сСриала Π±ΡƒΠ΄ΡƒΡ‚ длится 55 Π΄Π½Π΅ΠΉ 🎬

❀4

5 Aug 2025, 14:44 UTCβ‰ˆ2,920 views11 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Photo

β€”πŸ₯ΉπŸ€πŸΌ

❀‍πŸ”₯6πŸ’”2πŸ•Š2❀1

3 Aug 2025, 21:49 UTCβ‰ˆ2,580 viewsread 13 September 2026
Photo

—сторис ΠΌΠΈΡ€Π°ΠΉ ❀️

3 Aug 2025, 15:37 UTCβ‰ˆ3,310 views9 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Photo

β€” сСгодня Π½Π°Ρ‡Π°Π»ΠΈΡΡŒ ΡΡŠΡ‘ΠΌΠΊΠΈ сСриала: «с Π½Π°ΠΌΠΈ Π½ΠΈΡ‡Π΅Π³ΠΎ Π½Π΅ случится»

❀6❀‍πŸ”₯2πŸ”₯1

1 Aug 2025, 17:30 UTCβ‰ˆ2,330 views7 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Photo

πŸ“Œ- ΠΎΡ‚ бирсСн Π°Π»Ρ‚ΡƒΠ½Ρ‚Π°Ρˆ: Β«ΠΌΠΈΡ€Π°ΠΉ Π΄Π°Π½Π΅Ρ€ Π² настоящСС врСмя Π½Π΅ смоТСт Π΄ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒΡΡ ΠΎ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠΌ Π½ΠΈΠ±ΡƒΠ΄ΡŒ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ΅ΠΊΡ‚Π΅ Π½Π° Ρ‚Π΅Π»Π΅Π²ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅, Ρ‚Π°ΠΊ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π³Ρ€Π°Ρ„ΠΈΠΊ Π΅Π΅ Ρ€Π°Π±ΠΎΡ‚Ρ‹ ΠΏΠ»ΠΎΡ‚Π½ΠΎ составлСн Π΄ΠΎ ноября мСсяца»

πŸ₯°4πŸ’”2πŸ•Š1

1 Aug 2025, 17:27 UTCβ‰ˆ2,050 views4 reactionsread 13 September 2026

πŸ“Œ- ΠΌΠΈΡ€Π°ΠΉ Π΄Π°Π½Π΅Ρ€ ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ€Ρ‚ Ρ€Π°ΠΌΠ°Π·Π°Π½ Π΄Π΅ΠΌΠΈΡ€ подписались Π΄Ρ€ΡƒΠ³ Π½Π° Π΄Ρ€ΡƒΠ³Π° Π² инстаграмС.

❀4

10 Jul 2025, 14:42 UTCβ‰ˆ2,560 views11 reactionsread 13 September 2026
Photo

β€”πŸ₯ΉπŸ₯Ή

❀11

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @kuvvis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel β€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

NORTH CiNEMA
@NORTH_CiNEMA Β· 30,559
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 17 here β€” alongside 16 others β€” read 13 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one β€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œπ’Œπ’–π’—π’—π’Šπ’” | 𝒉𝒖𝒅𝒖𝒕𝒔𝒖𝒛 𝒔𝒆𝒗𝒅𝒂 πŸ€Žβ€ (@kuvvis), 364 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kuvvis.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.