晚安,愿好梦为你铺路,清晨为你带来新的答案 🌙

Channel
表情包广场 | 贴纸包广场 | 发现有趣 | 带来快乐
@kysticker
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
21,426subscribers
-118 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001891263730 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kysticker |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 29 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kysticker |
Topic
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 19:57 | 21,426 | -2 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 08:21 | 21,428 | +6 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 14:18 | 21,422 | +1 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 23:57 | 21,421 | -4 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 04:36 | 21,425 | -6 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 23:01 | 21,431 | -7 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 08:15 | 21,438 | -13 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:47 | 21,451 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:54 | 21,454 | -3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:23 | 21,457 | -8 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 21,465 | -9 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:17 | 21,474 | +5 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:33 | 21,469 | -5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:42 | 21,474 | -7 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:12 | 21,481 | -11 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 21:04 | 21,492 | +1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 10:26 | 21,491 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 09:11 | 21,494 | -12 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 06:23 | 21,506 | -8 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 09:28 | 21,514 | first reading |
Engagement
306 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.144%
- avg views ÷ 21,426 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 30.9
- 146 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.18%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 146
- of 306 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 146 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 306 (7 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 4,510 |
| Reactions total | 20 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 15:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 5m 20s
- Average length
- 2s
Measured directly from 167 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
43 reactions across 39 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 32 | 74.4% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 14.0% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 11.6% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 306 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 43 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 306 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
By @ladyrorash1 🤍 #o_189e3_by_MoiStikiBot #视频表情包 #能动的表情包 #video https://t.me/addstickers/o_189e3_by_MoiStikiBot
Protobeans Animated By @DragonLova #ProtobeansAnimatedByDragonlova #视频表情包 #能动的表情包 #video https://t.me/addstickers/ProtobeansAnimatedByDragonlova
счастливые люди :: @fStikBot #jrjska_by_fStikBot #静态表情包 #图片表情包 #static https://t.me/addstickers/jrjska_by_fStikBot
Steins;Gate @Rucodellllstickk #pk_6175541_by_Ctikerubot #视频表情包 #能动的表情包 #video https://t.me/addstickers/pk_6175541_by_Ctikerubot
ЧИВАВААВА @awwawi #chiwawwa_by_fStikBot #视频表情包 #能动的表情包 #video https://t.me/addstickers/chiwawwa_by_fStikBot
愿每一次醒来都提醒你,新的机会正在靠近 ☀️
@Energyyx's Sticker Pack 1 #energyyxdev_511639065_1 #静态表情包 #图片表情包 #static https://t.me/addstickers/energyyxdev_511639065_1
Scour @Fasrets #Fkmemzmfksd_by_fStikBot #视频表情包 #能动的表情包 #video https://t.me/addstickers/Fkmemzmfksd_by_fStikBot
@c0vqx #Yielding_Emerald_Tick_by_fStikBot #视频表情包 #能动的表情包 #video https://t.me/addstickers/Yielding_Emerald_Tick_by_fStikBot
ᅠᅠᅠ@jendires ᅠЯндук , #interviewwnk_by_favorite_stickers_bot #视频表情包 #能动的表情包 #video https://t.me/addstickers/interviewwnk_by_favorite_stickers_bot
Vodyanitsa 沃沃沃沃沃? @Notnene #woyanisha #静态表情包 #图片表情包 #static https://t.me/addstickers/woyanisha
Showing the 12 most recent of 306 posts we hold for @kysticker. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@fStikBot · 513,43117 postsChao James
@TrueYufan · 1,5727 posts snowkissed پكهون 🆕️
@d1cula · 1,0536 postsDewːPack
@DewPack · 9026 postsElegant Jake⁷ 🔒
@ElegantJake · 6804 posts𝓒𝓮𝓵𝓮𝓫𝓼 𝓟𝓪𝓬𝓴𝓼🥀
@duybenixke · 243 postsStickers Channel
@Stickers_AChansp · 3,6083 posts全网新闻吃瓜搞笑热搜爆料精选站
@wf66x1 · 1,5713 postswony fr neta
@wonyfrneta · 3083 postswony stickers
@wonyoung_stickers · 643 postsMiss在TG上干了啥
@Zhenxun2026 · 133 postsbaemon پڪ بهمون
@baemonfile · 2,8372 posts𝖡𝖫𝗐𝗈𝗈𝗋𝗅𝖽
@blwoorld · 4,6132 postsTelegram Premium Emoji
@emojiin · 9432 postsZB1 STICKERS
@INB1M · 1662 posts breadhoon
@s1iet · 2,6152 postsTelegram Stickers l Стикеры
@TVstickers · 20,7592 posts沃是妈妈
@vo_lover · 172 posts炸虾🍤
@zhaxia_cn · 12,5502 postsBOSS BABY آسا بیبیمانستر
@AsaEnamiIr · 9431 post лимонад . پک اسپا
@Douxea · 6,0611 postRuby Jennie
@jnekc · 8,9561 postPck
@m1dusa · 2881 post𓄹ׁꥌ𝐃𝐚𝐫𝐤魂𝐀𝐜𝐚𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐢𝐚﮼
@vnocc · 1,9211 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 2
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@kysticker named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 2 September 2026 – 2 September 2026 · confirmed gone 31 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
named in 1 post, 2 September 2026 – 2 September 2026 · confirmed gone 29 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“表情包广场 | 贴纸包广场 | 发现有趣 | 带来快乐” (@kysticker), 21,426 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kysticker.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.