Channel
@kznonline
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
16,687subscribers
-274 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001250277554 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kznonline |
| Description | Самые главные события Казани и Татарстана! Будьте на связи! Регистрация в РКН: https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/69fa07da087f8fa9a10db354 Наш второй аккаунт: @womankazan По вопросам рекламы @wkznlife (с пометкой "Телеграм") |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 57 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kznonline |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 12:10 | 16,687 | -5 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 10:09 | 16,692 | -4 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 11:06 | 16,696 | -8 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 14:01 | 16,704 | +2 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 12:36 | 16,702 | -6 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 13:48 | 16,708 | -8 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 14:40 | 16,716 | -5 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 13:35 | 16,721 | -2 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 13:28 | 16,723 | -6 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 15:00 | 16,729 | +1 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 15:45 | 16,728 | -4 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 18:38 | 16,732 | -6 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 20:57 | 16,738 | -2 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 16:07 | 16,740 | -6 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 13:44 | 16,746 | +1 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 16:19 | 16,745 | -1 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 16:55 | 16,746 | -4 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 13:30 | 16,750 | -4 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 14:37 | 16,754 | -2 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 13:19 | 16,756 | first reading |
187 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 74 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 22 of 29 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 187 (4 August 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 75,677 |
| Reactions total | 259 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 04:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 20 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,671 reactions across 151 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤡 | 487 | 18.2% | |
| 🤣 | 378 | 14.2% | |
| ❤ | 318 | 11.9% | |
| 😢 | 278 | 10.4% | |
| 🤬 | 247 | 9.25% | |
| 😭 | 140 | 5.24% | |
| 🕊 | 125 | 4.68% | |
| 👍 | 107 | 4.01% | |
| 🙏 | 106 | 3.97% | |
| 💯 | 105 | 3.93% | |
| 🔥 | 85 | 3.18% | |
| 😡 | 57 | 2.13% | |
| 😱 | 55 | 2.06% | |
| 🙈 | 47 | 1.76% | |
| 🤯 | 39 | 1.46% | |
| 😁 | 36 | 1.35% | |
| ❤🔥 | 16 | 0.599% | |
| 🤔 | 13 | 0.487% | |
| 🙊 | 10 | 0.374% | |
| 👀 | 7 | 0.262% | |
| 6 further kinds | 15 | 0.562% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 159 of the 187 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,671 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 187 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kznonline. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 187 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2VtzqwzNopn | 1 | 21 August 2026 | 21 August 2026 |
| 2W5zFG1ytWe | 1 | 5 November 2026 | 5 November 2026 |
| 2W5zFG3gixq | 1 | 22 August 2026 | 22 August 2026 |
| 2W5zFGM44oK | 1 | 2 September 2026 | 2 September 2026 |
| 2W5zFJ2yGx1 | 1 | 28 August 2026 | 28 August 2026 |
| 2W5zFJUa9ia | 1 | 5 November 2026 | 5 November 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 187 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 29 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Ролик снят много лет назад, а мы до сих пор его помним. 13 ноября на «Ночи пожирателей рекламы» в «Синема 5» можно будет посмотреть вирусные ролики нашего времени, которые меняют представление о рекламе. Билеты на такой необычный, но интересный формат на сайте кинотеатра. #реклама О рекламодателе
В Татарстане после смерти 12-летней девочки новых случаев менингококковой инфекции не зафиксировано. По данным ведомства, врачи продолжают наблюдение за контактными пациентами, проводят им обследования и вакцинацию, а также назначают лечение антибиотиками. «Новых случаев заболеваний менингококковой инфекцией не зарегистрировано», — сообщили в Минздраве РТ.
❤1
❗️ Пицце не место в российских школах — советник президента РФ Ямпольская
🤡21
🏡 Новоселье — повод собрать близких, а мы накормим всех вкусно и красиво! 😍 В кейтеринге Айгуль Усмановой: ✔️ аппетитная подача «как в ресторане», ✔️ меню под любой бюджет, ✔️ доставка точно ко времени, ✔️ никакой грязной посуды и усталости 😌 🤫Только для Казани — скидка 10% по промокоду КАЗАНЬ и 2% кешбэк за заказ Контакты для связи: @aigul_usmanova_kazan или позвоните по номеру: +79270420016 Подписывайтесь на на…
Мокрый снег с дождем накроет Казань ближе к обеду и затянется на несколько часов
⚡⚡⚡Введен режим "Беспилотная опасность". Объявлена угроза атаки БПЛА на города Набережные Челны, Нижнекамск, Альметьевск, Бугульма, Заинск.
В деревне Большие Аты Нижнекамского района РТ уже почти настоящая зима
❤19
С погибшей девочкой контактировал 81 человек Сейчас все дети под наблюдением врачей, на карантин никого не отправляли. Им предстоит пройти вакцинацию
⚡12-летняя девочка скончалась после отдыха в лагере Губина в Бугульме Спустя два дня после заезда ей стало плохо и поднялась температура. На следующий день родители забрали дочь домой, а через день ее увезли в реанимацию Лениногорской ЦРБ. 2 ноября ребёнок скончался. Предварительно, девочка скончалась от молниеносной формы менингококковой инфекции.
😭23❤2😱1
⚡ В метро Казани усилили контроль за перевозкой животных после падения пуделя под поезд на «Проспекте Победы». Провозить питомцев можно только в переносках с глухим дном, сумма трёх измерений которых не превышает 150 см. Исключение — собаки-проводники, сопровождающие инвалидов по зрению: их допускают без переноски, на коротком поводке и в наморднике при наличии документов. За провоз животного без переноски предусмот…
😡5❤1
❗️ Приложение МЧС России подверглось кибератаке Пользователи приложения МЧС России получили уведомления с ложной информацией — сервис взломали. Ведомство восстанавливает его работу и подчёркивает, что инцидент не затронул систему оповещения населения: основные сигналы поступают по другим каналам, а мобильное приложение служит лишь вспомогательным инструментом.
👀3🤣1
🥀 На 84-м году жизни скончался ветеран РКБ Леонид Рыбкин — заслуженный врач республики, кандидат медицинских наук, доцент Более полувека он посвятил Республиканской клинической больнице: работал заместителем главного врача, заведующим организационно-методическим отделом, участвовал в формировании структуры больницы. Его предложения по организации коечного фонда были одобрены Минздравом РСФСР и рекомендованы другим у…
🙏17😢5❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 187 posts we hold for @kznonline. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@kznonline edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 18 posts on @kznonline as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Казань Онлайн | Главный Казанский Паблик” (@kznonline), 16,687 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kznonline.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.