أحياناً المشكلة مش بقلة الاهتمام، بل بتوقيته؛ الرجل بده اهتمام، والمرأة كمان بدها اهتمام، لكن كل واحد فيهم ممكن يفهم الاهتمام بطريقة مختلفة، ويحتاجه بوقت مختلف، تخيّل رجل راجع من شغله، مُرهق وما عنده طاقة يحكي، فتستقبله زوجته بأسئلة: وين كنت؟ ليش تأخرت؟ ليش ما سألت عني؟ هي من وجهة نظرها بتحاول تهتم وتفتح معه حديث، لكن هو بهاللحظة مش محتاج أسئلة، محتاج شوية هدوء وراحة. وهان بصير سوء الفهم؛ هي بتفسر سكوته على إنه إهمال…

Channel
روح
@lSou_l
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
10,813subscribers
-659 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002585259098 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lSou_l |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lSou_l |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 09:34 | 10,813 | +64 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 10:46 | 10,749 | +73 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 13:58 | 10,676 | +66 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 17:26 | 10,610 | +47 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 16:08 | 10,563 | -13 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 13:27 | 10,576 | -16 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 10:35 | 10,592 | -11 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 12:16 | 10,603 | -15 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 10:38 | 10,618 | -11 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 09:11 | 10,629 | -6 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 09:48 | 10,635 | -12 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 09:36 | 10,647 | -14 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 06:27 | 10,661 | -11 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 04:07 | 10,672 | -19 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 00:31 | 10,691 | -18 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 20:26 | 10,709 | -25 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 17:17 | 10,734 | -14 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 15:30 | 10,748 | -18 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 15:16 | 10,766 | -12 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 14:29 | 10,778 | first reading |
Engagement
77 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 15.6%
- avg views ÷ 10,813 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,680
- 25 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 25
- of 77 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 25 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 77 (29 July 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 42,046 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 09:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 91
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 34
- of 77 we hold a reading for · 44%
- Most on one post
- 12
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lSou_l. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 77 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 25 posts held from the last 30 days (4.00%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
التوقيت أهم من الإهتمام نفسه.
. 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟
بتعرف شو بصير لما تحضن شخص بتحبه؟ - جسمك بيفرز هرمون الأوكسيتوسين "Oxytocin"، واللي بنسميه هرمون الحب أو الترابط، بيساعد على تقليل التوتر، وبيخفض مستويات الكورتيزول "هرمون التوتر"، وبيعزز الشعور بالأمان والراحة والحب. وفي علم النفس، بتشير الدراسات إلى أن العناق الدافئ من شخص بنثق فيه وبنحبه ممكن يساعدنا على تنظيم استجابتنا للضغط النفسي، ويخلينا نشعر إننا مش لحالنا في مواجهة العالم. روح | وفي ذات الروح روحٌ أخرى.
هذي الفترة من بين كل الفترات مالها شعور محدد، مرات تصحى وإنت نفسك تختفي من الوجود، ومرة تصحى وإنت متصالح مع الحياة، ومرة تصحى قلقان بدون سبب، ومرة بدك يمشي اليوم وإنت ساكت، هذا غير أن أحياناً بدك تنام ساعات طويلة.
الخدر العاطفي هو حالة من ضعف الاستجابة للمشاعر، بيحس فيها الشخص كأنه منفصل عن مشاعره، لا الحزن بيأثر فيه بالشكل المعتاد، ولا الفرح بيقدر يوصل إله بنفس الطريقة، ممكن يمر بمواقف مؤلمة أو سعيدة، لكنه بيلاقي نفسه غير قادر على التفاعل معها عاطفيًا، وكأنه فقد الاتصال بالجزء اللي كان يشعر من خلاله.
يمكن إحنا ما بنخاف من التقدم بالعمر قد ما بنخاف نوصل لعمر معين ونكتشف إننا ما عشنا الحياة اللي كنا متخيلينها، وإن كل اللي عملناه هو إننا كنا نحاول نلحقها.
اللَّهم صَلِّ وسلِّم وبارِك علَى سيِّدنَا مُحمَّد ﷺ.
اللهُمَّ في يوم الجمعة، قَدرًا جَميلًا ودعوة مُستجابـة .
. 👁👁👁👁👁👁
لا تساوي الناس بالناس —— حط المُناسب بالمكان المُناسب.
الفكرة مش إنك تكون single أو مرتبط، الفكرة إنك ما تدخل علاقة لمجرد إنك خايف من الوحدة، ولا ترفض الحب لمجرد إنك تعودت على الاستقلالية... الاستقلالية حلوة في إنك بتتعلم تكون مكتفي بنفسك، ما بتربط سعادتك بوجود إنسان، ولا بتستنى من شخص يعطيك الشعور بالأمان اللي المفروض تتعلم تبنيه جواتك، بتعيش بطريقتك، بتاخذ قراراتك بحرية، وبتكتشف حالك أكثر، بعيداً عن محاولات إرضاء الجميع أو الخوف من خسارتهم. ومع هيك، مش معنى إنك مرتاح ل…
Showing the 12 most recent of 77 posts we hold for @lSou_l. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 5 posts on @lSou_l as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 11 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 5 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 3 days
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 1
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
برأيكم، إلى أي حد بنقدر نلوم الإنسان على أخطائه، إذا كانت طفولته القاسية والظروف اللي عاشها هي اللي ساهمت في تشكيل شخصيته؟
- بنقدر نلومه، بالنهاية هو مسؤول عن تصرفاته.13%
- ما بنقدر نلومه بالكامل، ظروفه إلها دور كبير.33%
- بنتفهم أسبابه، لكن هذا ما بيبرر أخطاءه.63%
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 77 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“روح” (@lSou_l), 10,813 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lSou_l.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.