Channel
@laEscobaDeDios
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
2,968subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 1,000β3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001822997589 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @laEscobaDeDios |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/laEscobaDeDios |
Politics & activism β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 09:01 | 2,968 | -4 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 23:37 | 2,972 | -4 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 00:01 | 2,976 | +1 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 00:16 | 2,975 | +2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:25 | 2,973 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:04 | 2,975 | +5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:03 | 2,970 | +3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:38 | 2,967 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 2,969 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:08 | 2,968 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:45 | 2,972 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:00 | 2,971 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:48 | 2,971 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
508 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 261 | 51.4% | |
| π | 58 | 11.4% | |
| π― | 50 | 9.84% | |
| π₯ | 49 | 9.65% | |
| π€¬ | 47 | 9.25% | |
| β‘ | 38 | 7.48% | |
| π | 3 | 0.591% | |
| π | 2 | 0.394% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 508 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ΒΏQuΓ© mΓ‘s claro que esto? Hitler lo seΓ±alΓ³: los intereses del capitalismo se transforman en la fuerza polΓtica que mueve y dirige tanto a la izquierda como a la derecha, en manos de los judios.
https://t.me/Biblioteca_siege Recomiendo encarecidamente seguir este canal. No debemos despistarnos ni un Γ‘pice de seΓ±alar al director de orquesta que mantiene al mundo en penumbra, destrucciΓ³n y nos empujan a nuestra desapariciΓ³n. El judΓo internacional.
TrasladΓ©monos a una taberna espaΓ±ola de hace siglos. Siglos XV Y XVI. Rodrigo MartΓnez. Cancionero de Palacio. No mΓ‘s gritos, lloros ni quejidos flamencos.. GOTT MIT UNS π·π π°πππππ π―π π―πππ
β€11
EspaΓ±a arde, no se respetan las fronteras, el precio del litro de gasolina 2β¬, invasiΓ³n migratoria, el presidente de Ceuta tiene que ir a Mallorca porque este tΓo guapo no pisa la ciudad autΓ³noma.... Pero para esto vale Felpudo IV. Oye pero que viva el Rey... GOTT MIT UNS π·π π°πππππ π―π π―πππ
π€¬13π₯7π2π―1
El 6 de agosto de 1945 a las 8:15 horas, un bombardero B-29 llamado Enola Gay lanzΓ³ sobre la ciudad de Hiroshima la primera bomba atΓ³mica, bautizada como Little Boy. Ordenado por el Presidente Truman, alrededor de 200.000 almas fueron arrebatadas en un claro ejemplo de crimen de los buenos. Espero que esta camarilla de siervos del mal, estΓ©n ardiendo en el infierno por la eternidad. GOTT MIT UNS π·π π°πππππ π―π π―πππ
π€¬13π―4
En definitiva, sea cual sea lo malhadado de la situaciΓ³n, y aunque el interregno se prolongue, el Β«olvido del reinoΒ» cunda en torno nuestro, y la vida montaraz a la intemperie pueda a veces hacerse solitaria, la consigna es clara: Hay que luchar por el Retorno del Rey. El Poder Del Mito. GOTT MIT UNS π·π π°πππππ π―π π―πππ
β‘18β€3
Ceuta la ciudad autΓ³noma en 1958, durante el RΓ©gimen Nacional. Cuanta desgracia han traΓdo los partidos polΓticos, el parlamentarismo y la asquerosa y decadente democracia y los polΓticos que han vendido la patria. GOTT MIT UNS π·π π°πππππ π―π π―πππ
β€39π―1
Si, tenemos la soluciΓ³n, porque ya funcionΓ³. Tendremos que pasar otra vez por una contienda en suelo patrio y esta vez si acabar con todo traidor e invasor.. Fuente:ElReaccionario GOTT MIT UNS π·π π°πππππ π―π π―πππ
β€30π―2
Falange de Granada. CanciΓ³n Falangista. Β«No hay mΓ‘s que una EspaΓ±a: la que se alza contra la injusticia, contra la mentira y contra la opresiΓ³n.Β» β Ramiro Ledesma Ramos Fuente: ElReaccionario. GOTT MIT UNS π·π π°πππππ π―π π―πππ
π₯12β€10
EspaΓ±a estΓ‘ dΓ©bil, si, pero no estΓ‘ muerta, por las venas corre sangre valiente, estoica. Arrebatemos el destino de la patria a los boomer que traicionaron "judieizando" la vida y aburguesΓ‘ndose. Grande Gonzalo. GOTT MIT UNS π·π π°πππππ π―π π―πππ
β€29π4
GUERRA AL INVASOR
β€27β‘5π2π₯2
MaΓ±ana dΓa 31 de Julio, Falange, NΓΊcleo Nacional, Democracia Nacional, y seguramente mΓ‘s grupos nacionalistas identitarios aunaremos fuerzas porque la situaciΓ³n ya es insostenible. Β‘Acudamos en masa! No celebramos el Mundial, defendemos la tierra de nuestros ancestros! ARRIBA ESPAΓA Y ARRIBA EUROPA. Nos vemos allΓ.
β€34π7
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @laEscobaDeDios. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
ββοΈ π³π π¬πππππ π«π π«πππ βπΌβ (@laEscobaDeDios), 2,968 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/laEscobaDeDios.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.