Video, posted without a caption
👍10👀2🤣2

Channel
@labdiagnostica_logical
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,208subscribers
+14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001680772577 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @labdiagnostica_logical |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/labdiagnostica_logical |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 15:00 | 7,208 | +4 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 23:41 | 7,204 | -2 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 07:18 | 7,206 | -9 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 13:59 | 7,215 | +4 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:08 | 7,211 | +2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:03 | 7,209 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 14:38 | 7,210 | +9 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:36 | 7,201 | +3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 05:53 | 7,198 | +2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 08:32 | 7,196 | +8 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:43 | 7,188 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:17 | 7,190 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 7,194 | first reading |
29 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 29 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,047 reactions across 28 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 462 | 44.1% | |
| 👍 | 363 | 34.7% | |
| 🙏 | 71 | 6.78% | |
| 💯 | 42 | 4.01% | |
| 👏 | 36 | 3.44% | |
| ❤🔥 | 31 | 2.96% | |
| 👀 | 15 | 1.43% | |
| 🐳 | 13 | 1.24% | |
| 🤣 | 9 | 0.86% | |
| 💔 | 3 | 0.287% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.096% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.096% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,047 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Video, posted without a caption
👍10👀2🤣2
Действительно никогда не включаю его в "профилактический чек-ап" - замучаешься интерпретировать 🙈 На него влияют ВСЕ возможные факторы, происходящие с пробиркой, любое заболевание, особенно воспалительное, прием препаратов (чем больше, тем непонятнее гомоцистеин). СТРОГО одна лаборатория, минимум транспортировки и ДИНАМИКА. По одной цифре не спешим напихать витаминов группы В и назначить (прости Господи) генетику фол…
🔥28👏7💯4🙏3👍2👀1
АМГ - антимюллеров гормон. Серьезное. Больше женское, но и мужское тоже. 📚Про него знают те, кто столкнулся с проблемой фертильности. 📑Его стали включать в "перименопаузальные" чек-апы. 📚В моей практике не однократно встречались случаи "приговорных" диагнозов при однократных низких значениях АМГ. 😔 Упустим диагностическую значимость гормона и давайте про анализ: 🧪Методы определения ИФА и ИХЛА с разнообразием прибо…
🔥24👍13❤🔥10🙏5
Антимюллеров гормон. Серьезное ⬇️
👍8💔1
Video, posted without a caption
🔥20👍10🙏2
Лабораторная медицина - это вроде и медицина, но как другая планета.👽 Планета, летящая вне всей солнечной системы.👽 🧪Рекомендации "по анализам", "расшифровкам" дают все - и кто строго действует в клин реках и кто "интегративит-мракобесит-оптимумы сочиняет". Анализы же все знают 🙈 ✔️Здесь на картинке пример вроде обычных докмедовских рекомендаций, но есть нюансы: ⚗️Про липиды "не натощак" я уже писала. Подробно…
👍35🔥13👏4🙏3
Сегодня состоится последняя лекция онлайн‑марафона на тему: «Анализ мочи - неочевидные показатели и выводы» Сегодня в 15:00 по МСК Спикер: Терещенко Ирина Петровна к.м.н., врачом клинической лабораторной диагностики, врачом-педиатром, организатором здравоохранения, директором по развитию МИЦ «Иммункулус» ⚠️ Ссылка на подключение будет отправлена в - 14:50, чтобы вы успели вовремя присоединиться к эфиру.
🔥21👍5
Сегодня в повторе одна из лекций. Тема общего анализа мочи одна из моих любимых) В студенчестве, работая мед сестрой в отделении нефрологии, узнала не только про преаналитические особенности этого биоматериала 🫗- вечерами очень любила подклеивать анализы в истории болезни, сравнивать результаты, читать диагнозы📖📖. А потом в интернатуре я работала врачом в этом же отделении) 😉В общем лекция от всей души!⬇️⬇️⬇️
🔥18
Ну что могу сказать... я все-таки очень хороший врач) поднять себя за два дня и сохранить результат (сегодня без личников, но из двух часов вышла). Именно так может выглядеть "черный лебедь" у человека, который практически не болеет - максимум раз в два года и то легко. А тут за два дня до старта вирусно-бактериальное приключение... Считаю что я молодец , но повторять не рекомендую) Сейчас ноги просят пощады 🙈, а…
🔥57👏8🙏5
Video, posted without a caption
🙏27👍11🔥9👏1
Клеща исследуют методом ПЦР на обнаружение ДНК и РНК инфекций. Особенно востребованы тесты на вирус клещевого энцефалита и боррелиоз. Для этого его "растворяют" в пробирке и достают всю ДНК, чтобы выцепить фрагменты вредоносной для человека. 🙂В принципе, на слове ПЦР, пост можно было закончить - но поясню основные моменты: ✅Метод ПЦР определяет нуклеиновые кислоты (ДНК и РНК) возбудителей и,как у любого метода, …
🔥31👍17
Никогда не поздно🙈 В рекомендациях этого года при снятии клеща нужно тащить его на анализ. 🧪 Разница в том, что в прошлом году нужно было "кошмарить" людей клещевыми инфекциями, делать акции, чтобы человек нес клеща и деньги, а в этом году официально сказали делать. Только смысл анализа, равно как и влияние на тактику никак не изменилось. ❗️Положительный клещ не значит, что вы заразились и заболеете, а отрицательный…
💯16🙏8
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @labdiagnostica_logical. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“АНАЛИЗЫ СО СМЫСЛОМ® | Терещенко Ирина” (@labdiagnostica_logical), 7,208 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/labdiagnostica_logical.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.