Channel
@lagharfit
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,558subscribers
-541 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001339295605 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lagharfit |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lagharfit |
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 11:40 | 8,558 | -53 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 14:00 | 8,611 | -29 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 07:40 | 8,640 | -83 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 02:59 | 8,723 | -45 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:17 | 8,768 | -36 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:01 | 8,804 | -34 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:24 | 8,838 | -55 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:28 | 8,893 | -39 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 21:42 | 8,932 | -29 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:37 | 8,961 | -48 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:08 | 9,009 | -40 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:24 | 9,049 | -27 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:10 | 9,076 | -23 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:52 | 9,099 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:26 | 9,099 | first reading |
146 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 146 (3 August 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 9,563 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 16:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 30 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
راز این دو خواهر همینجا بود! 🔎 با اینکه غذای اصلیشون تقریباً یکی بود، اما الگوی خوردنشون اصلاً شبیه هم نبود یکی در طول روز چندین بار سراغ خوراکیهای کوچیک میرفت؛ ⛔️ یه ناخنک اینجا، یه شیرینی اونجا، یه خوراکی بین دو وعده...🍰🍫🍭🍬 و چون هیچکدوم رو یک «وعده غذایی» حساب نمیکرد، ❌ خودش هم متوجه نمیشد این خوردنهای پراکنده چقدر روی دریافت غذایی روزانهاش اثر میذاره 😳
خانم یاسبلاغی بعد از عمل فتق ناف و کیسه صفرا با بههمریختگی گوارش و مشکل در دفع مواجه شده بودن... 😔 🛎 اما حالا در مسیر جدیدشون... ۵ کیلو و ۷۰۰ گرم در ۱۵ روز 😍 بدون سختی وزن کم کردن و از قبل هم سرحالترن! 👏🔥 و خوشحالن از اینکه فقط وزنشون تغییر نکرده بلکه سفرهی خونه و سبک غذایی بچههاشون هم تغییر کرده! 🥹🌱 📩 شماهم برای دریافت مشاوره رایگان و بررسی شرایطتون، کلمه «مشاوره» رو ارسال کنید👇 🆔@mardani_lagharfiit .
Video, posted without a caption
دقیقتر بررسی کردم و ازشون خواستم این بار با جزئیات بیشتری برام توضیح بدن...❗ و چیزی که فهمیدم، واقعاً جالب بود! 😳🔎 اما قبل از اینکه بگم چه چیزی پیدا کردم، این رو ببین👇🎥
دارم یکی یکی نظراتتون رو میخونم 💚 📲@mardani_lagharfiit .
اتفاقاً سؤال خوبیه! تو هم یه حدس بزن؛ ببینیم به جواب نزدیک میشی یا نه؟ 👇 🆔@mardani_lagharfiit .
یکی داشت چاق تر میشد یکی لاغرتر🤷♀ فکر میکنی علتش چی میتونه باشه؟💡 اینجا بهم بگو 👇 📲 @mardani_lagharfiit
داشتم پروندهی دو تا خواهر رو بررسی میکردم 👭🔎 همهچی به نظر مرتب میرسید؛ ✨ غذاهایی که میخوردن 🍽 وعدههاشون 🍿 حتی چیزهایی که فکر میکردن باید حذف کنن...❌ اما یه چیزی توی ماجرا جور درنمیاومد! 🤔
احتمالاً بعضی از این موارد رو کاملاً معمولی و بیخطر میدونید؛❌ شاید حتی جزو چیزهایی باشن که همیشه توی خونهتون پیدا میشن! 🚨 پس قبل از اینکه بگید: «مگه اینم مشکلی داره؟! 🤔» فقط چند دقیقه وقت بذارید و این ویدیو رو ببینید 📍 توی این ویدیو دقیقاً درباره همین انتخابها صحبت میکنیم 🗣 و میگیم که چرا خودم ترجیح میدم مصرفشون نکنم و عزیزانم هم انتخابشون نکنن ❌ 🎥 ویدیو رو ببینید و بعد برگردید بهم بگید: کدوم مورد …
حتما این ویدیو رو قبل از وعده بعدی تون ببینید ✅ دکتر مردانی | سلامتی و تناسباندام با #رژیم_قلیایی✨ ʲᵒⁱⁿ [ @lagharfit ] .
. ما معمولاً وقتی به سلامتیمون فکر میکنیم که یه مشکلی خودش رو نشون بده...👩🦯 در حالی که مراقبت واقعی، خیلی قبلتر از اون شروع میشه 🌱 و دقیقاً برای همین، میخوام چند مورد رو باهاتون به اشتراک بذارم ♻️ که شاید بعد از دیدنشون، دفعه بعد که خواستید سراغشون برید، 🧍♀🧍 یک لحظه بیشتر فکر کنید... 🧠🤔 فقط چند دقیقه دیگه با من همراه باشید...🕛 .
گاهی واقعاً انگار نه انگار که داریم دربارهی سلامتی خودمون حرف میزنیم... 😔 انگار نه انگار بدنمون قراره سالها با همین انتخابها زندگی کنه! انگار نه انگار که باید حواسمون به خودمون و عزیزانمون باشه...🫂💚 انگار نه انگار که بعضی عادتهای ساده، وقتی مدام تکرار میشن، میتونن برای بدنمون هزینه داشته باشن 🥺
Showing the 12 most recent of 146 posts we hold for @lagharfit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@lagharfit named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“لاغری آسان با رژیم قلیایی (لاغرفیت)” (@lagharfit), 8,558 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lagharfit.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.