Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for الاعلامي ليث الدجيلي

Channel

الاعلامي ليث الدجيلي

@laith_sadik1

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

33,166subscribers

+165 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001121562261
TypeChannel
Username@laith_sadik1
Descriptionاهلاً وسهلاً بجميع متابعينا الاعزاء .... للتواصل معي من خلال معرفي الشخصي https://t.me/Laith_AlDujaili حسابي الشخصي على الانستا https://instagram.com/laith_al_dujaili?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y= او يمكنكم التواصل معي من خلال الهاتف المحمول ((07817401102))
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 29 February 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/laith_sadik1

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

32,93733,16633,051.55 August 2026 — 33,001 subscribers6 August 2026 — 33,001 subscribers6 August 2026 — 32,997 subscribers7 August 2026 — 32,990 subscribers8 August 2026 — 32,992 subscribers9 August 2026 — 32,986 subscribers10 August 2026 — 32,978 subscribers11 August 2026 — 32,973 subscribers12 August 2026 — 32,971 subscribers13 August 2026 — 32,968 subscribers14 August 2026 — 32,965 subscribers16 August 2026 — 32,969 subscribers17 August 2026 — 32,968 subscribers18 August 2026 — 32,964 subscribers19 August 2026 — 32,961 subscribers20 August 2026 — 32,960 subscribers22 August 2026 — 32,957 subscribers24 August 2026 — 32,953 subscribers25 August 2026 — 32,943 subscribers26 August 2026 — 32,937 subscribers27 August 2026 — 32,945 subscribers28 August 2026 — 32,943 subscribers30 August 2026 — 32,953 subscribers31 August 2026 — 32,963 subscribers1 September 2026 — 32,966 subscribers2 September 2026 — 32,976 subscribers3 September 2026 — 32,985 subscribers6 September 2026 — 32,980 subscribers9 September 2026 — 32,956 subscribers11 September 2026 — 32,943 subscribers13 September 2026 — 32,960 subscribers15 September 2026 — 33,010 subscribers16 September 2026 — 33,104 subscribers19 September 2026 — 33,166 subscribers5 August 202619 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 45 days, net +165. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32,903–33,200 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 13:4033,166+62
16 Sept 2026, 23:5633,104+94
15 Sept 2026, 03:1533,010+50
13 Sept 2026, 15:3932,960+17
11 Sept 2026, 23:4032,943-13
9 Sept 2026, 11:5532,956-24
6 Sept 2026, 00:3632,980-5
3 Sept 2026, 23:3932,985+9
2 Sept 2026, 11:2332,976+10
1 Sept 2026, 09:4732,966+3
31 Aug 2026, 06:5432,963+10
30 Aug 2026, 07:4432,953+10
28 Aug 2026, 07:5332,943-2
27 Aug 2026, 06:1132,945+8
26 Aug 2026, 03:2932,937-6
25 Aug 2026, 05:1332,943-10
24 Aug 2026, 03:3732,953-4
22 Aug 2026, 09:1232,957-3
20 Aug 2026, 20:5832,960-1
19 Aug 2026, 19:0332,961first reading

Engagement

199 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 79 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.0%
avg views ÷ 33,166 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,610
106 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
107
of 199 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026
Posts held199 (2 August 202624 September 2026)
Views total1,018,487
Reactions total10,728
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken24 Sept 2026, 06:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
6,240
Videos
203
Links
1,620

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
10m 09s
Average length
1m 08s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

17,890 reactions across 193 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10,76560.2%
💔2,08411.6%
👍1,88910.6%
😭1,3237.40%
😁4292.40%
🔥3882.17%
🥰3281.83%
🎉2451.37%
🕊2201.23%
🙏2191.22%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 198 of the 199 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18,367 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 199 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
105
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 198 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
100
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @laith_sadik1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 199 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 24 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

24 Sept 2026, 06:06 UTC430 views15 reactionsread 24 September 2026

طقس العراق.. ارتفاع جديد في درجات الحرارة مطلع الأسبوع القادم

9💔6

23 Sept 2026, 20:43 UTC≈3,490 views109 reactionsread 24 September 2026

العيداني يعلن استضافة خليجي 28 في البصرة

86👍10🎉6🔥5💔1😁1

23 Sept 2026, 16:38 UTC≈5,560 views179 reactionsread 24 September 2026

⚽️ نهاية المباراة : • العراق 1 - 1 عمان

😭8742💔31👍13😁5🕊1

23 Sept 2026, 16:27 UTC≈5,750 views49 reactionsread 24 September 2026

8 دقائق بدل ضائع

💔35😭65👍3

23 Sept 2026, 16:16 UTC≈5,910 views58 reactionsread 24 September 2026

الدقيقة 80 العراق 1 عمان 1

💔3622

23 Sept 2026, 15:56 UTC≈6,180 views47 reactionsread 24 September 2026

تبديل ثاني للعراق الدقيقة 57 خروج مصطفى سعدون ومحمد قاسم دخول علي جاسم ومحمد دلاور

37💔9👍1

23 Sept 2026, 15:47 UTC≈6,200 views54 reactionsread 24 September 2026

انذار اصفر زيد تحسين

💔40😭113

23 Sept 2026, 15:42 UTC≈6,200 views62 reactionsread 24 September 2026

بداية الشوط الثاني كل التوفيق للاسود 🇮🇶

56🔥6

23 Sept 2026, 15:23 UTC≈6,310 views76 reactionsread 24 September 2026

نهاية الشوط الأول من المباراة 1 العراق - عمان 0

55👍8🙏5🕊4🔥3💔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 199 posts we hold for @laith_sadik1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@laith_sadik1 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
26 August 2026
Most recent edit
26 August 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

الدجيل
@iraq_D_2010 · 5,949
#1
مدينتي الدجيل ❤️🌹
@lraq_PR · 2,029
#2
نيمار ابن الانبار
@iraqedu · 4,431,987
#3
اعدادية شهداء الدجيل للبنين تأسست عام 2016
@shuhdaa_aldujail · 820
#4
الصف الثالث بلاط الشهداء
@sec9t · 150
#5
الإعلامي بسام الانصاري
@ba_86 · 882
#6
متوسطة ذي قار للبنات
@thi_qarll · 613
#7
ثانوية دار السلام
@daralsalaam · 439
#8
اعدادية الابراهيمية للبنين
@pabb990 · 78
#9
إعلام تربية محافظة صلاح الدين الرسمي
@salhaldeeneducationmidea · 4,669
#10
متوسطة شهداء الدجيل للبنين
@malshuhada · 840
#11
الاستاذ عباس الجميلي
@EnglishforIraqAbbasaljumaily · 2,646
#12
AL—yarmouk
@ALYarmouk_mh · 371
#13
بإنتَضار الحُجة♡
@z_hzfk · 197
#14
جامعة الإمام جعفر الصادق ع فرع صلاح الدين
@IJSUBSA · 2,600
#15
ابن النجف
@lreqed · 385,136
#16
ابن الدورة
@Edu211 · 652,328
#17
معهد نون والقلم
@mahdnoon2022 · 1,246
#18
الـدِين وَ الدُنـيا
@AlQuran_f · 371
#19
شبكة ملازمنا
@mlazemna · 1,044,735
#20
نيمار ابن الانبار iraqedu
@v999v · 1,574,082
#21
م.اليرموك الصف الثاني
@A3ah11 · 82
#22
ابن الدورة
@edu2iq · 1,181,015
#23
𝒑𝒉𝒂𝒓𝒎𝒂𝒄𝒚 4𝒕𝒉..🥼💊⚕
@Pharmacy_3rd_RUC · 893
#24
متوسطة الدجيل المسائية المختلطة
@Eveningschool · 299
#25
لـ صَاحـب الزَمـان ³¹³
@tyiopasdf · 113
#26
منصة صلاح الدين الإخبارية
@salahdennn · 35,237
#27
أ.حيدر عبدالائمه
@hayderabdamaa11 · 292,626
#28
الخـــوة النــظيفـة تـجـمعنـــــــا ⁞␍
@al_ayed7 · 917
#29
تعيينات محافظة صلاح الدين
@sdgover · 3,849
#30
أختبارات ﴿ مَنصة عبداللّٰه أحمد ﴾ ✨
@cxer7 · 359
#31
وكالة الخضراء الخبرية GNA
@b8_29 · 195,499
#32
قناه الامام المهدي 😔♥³¹³.
@Keoyb · 549 (as read 4 September 2026)
#33
اقتباسات عبارات ستوريات 0:0
@PPPJP · 3,208,272
#34
إسطوره༒
@zozozozo00 · 181
#35
مدرسة الزبيدات للبنات الصف السادس الابتدائي ٢٠٢٤
@Alzobadat6th2024 · 24
#36
Feelings - مشاعر
@aararr · 2,008
#37
أ.محمد الزبيدي ((Med Alzubaidi))
@Med_AlZubaidi · 1,793
#38
الـ بـَلال .
@jyr206 · 122
#39
[صــور شــفافـه روم الـخـــوة]
@al_ayed8 · 152
#40
فيزياء السادس العلمي (أ.انور السلامي)
@anwerphy · 7,442
#41
المرتكَز | Al-Murtakaz
@AlMurtakaz · 1,019 (as read 4 September 2026)
#42
مِــن الـقَلــبِ إلى الـقَلــبِ
@MHH3131 · 151
#43
- البَرُّ التَّقِـيُّ .
@za_ail0 · 299
#44
ڪُل مافي القَلـب ♥️✨
@fat1m11 · 131
#45
•مـزاجيـون♡
@y_120 · 233
#46
قصائد نسائيه مكتوبة ✍️ 📖
@m_alaydy_z · 12,863
#47
محب الولايته علي ابن ابي طالب (ع)
@dh_0uom · 117
#48
شـوق﮼-🤎𓈒𓏲
@shuk_2005 · 144
#49
الوِتر،المَوّتُور .
@llwIIu · 472
#50
𝐑
@xzcyp · 93 (as read 4 September 2026)
#51
- ذو الـفَـقـار .
@Z_R_8_11 · 662
#52
مكتوبات شعريه
@VOnCZT · 1,512
#53
- حُب .
@x923x · 1,112
#54
الاعلامي محمد قاسم
@mmww1994 · 369
#55
⩇⩇:⩇⩇
@uug_10 · 163
#56
خبز يابس
@pn0_w · 309
#57
Inner Spark.
@J_Iue · 597 (as read 4 September 2026)
#58
المصور طه ياسين
@TahaYassin3 · 165
#59
وكالة بلد الاخبارية
@balad_news · 2,860
#60
كورسات تداول مدفوعة 🔱
@hpc5f · 391 (as read 4 September 2026)
#61

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 4 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

منصة صلاح الدين الإخبارية
@salahdennn · 35,237
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 3 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“الاعلامي ليث الدجيلي” (@laith_sadik1), 33,166 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/laith_sadik1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.