Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Лана Данилова | Иллюстрации и заметки

Channel

Лана Данилова | Иллюстрации и заметки

@lanadanilova_art

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,223subscribers

-25 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001772987943
TypeChannel
Username@lanadanilova_art
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/lanadanilova_art

Topic

Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,2221,2481,2357 August 2026 — 1,248 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,248 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,247 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,242 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,239 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,238 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,233 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,228 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,227 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,224 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,222 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,223 subscribers1,2237 August 202614 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 37 days, net -25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,218–1,252 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 04:381,223+1
10 Sept 2026, 15:211,222-2
30 Aug 2026, 04:121,224-3
27 Aug 2026, 10:491,227-1
24 Aug 2026, 20:341,228-5
20 Aug 2026, 23:471,233-5
18 Aug 2026, 05:051,238-1
15 Aug 2026, 03:231,239-3
12 Aug 2026, 01:561,242-5
8 Aug 2026, 20:121,247-1
7 Aug 2026, 23:011,248no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:471,248first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 4 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
24s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

597 reactions across 8 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤩14123.6%
13823.1%
🔥10918.3%
custom 59899988683333341688213.7%
😍7412.4%
👏193.18%
👍183.02%
🥰162.68%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 597 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 4 May 2026 to 19 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Jul 2026, 18:04 UTC216 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Решила взять руки в руки и систематизировать каталогизировать привести в порядок все выкраски 😁🙈 А то шикарный технический блокнот от @art-diary поглядывает на меня с укоризной. Но я же не могу просто взять и выкрасить, мне надо, что это было логично и вот тут подкрался северный пушной зверек и вкрадчиво так начал нашептывать, что логика говорит делать выкраски, идя по пигментному ряду от меньшего к большему в каждо

13custom 598999886833333416813🔥4

2 Jul 2026, 19:20 UTC≈1,010 views97 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

**Сова Афина** - одна из героинь моих лесных историй, бывшая жительница Очень Большого Города, прочитала много-много книг и хорошо знает законы, тк раньше жила в городской библиотеке и в здании суда. Живет в дупле Старого Дуба на северном краю Круга Лесных Историй. Теперь это старое дерево называют Судейский Дуб, а часть поляны перед ним - Место для Важных Разговоров Мудрая, спокойная и обладает тонким, ироничным юмо

😍7414🔥9

25 Jun 2026, 07:18 UTC449 views98 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

**Путешествие Фаи и Игниса** Ничто так не бодрит юный исследовательский дух, как возможность найти уникальный экземпляр огненной флоры или фауны в месте, где обычный человек поджарился бы, как гренка. Знакомьтесь: Фаэна или Фая была совсем не похожа на стереотипных фей. Она носила практичный комбинезон, а вместо аккуратных локонов её голову украшала задорная короткая стрижка тёмных волос, которые вечно топорщились в

🤩7420🥰4

22 Jun 2026, 18:37 UTC992 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Прикупила себе новые карандаши от Малевичей. Коробка красивая, запах есть, но не слишком сшибающий. А вот с карандашами ощущения странные. Сделаю полноценную картинку и тогда пойму окончательно мое или нет. Первое впечатление ну такоэ… Рыхлый грифель, пылят сильно (оставляют катышки и крошки), забивают бумагу в лет - третий слой уже плывет. Будто пластилиновые или детские. Ни разу это не аналог Derwent Drawing как го

custom 598999886833333416825👍107

1 Jun 2026, 16:10 UTC≈1,160 views104 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Самири и Цин-Лунг Ваджрадар #акварель и #цветныекарандаши Однажды гроза собралась особенно яростная. Самири стояла на краю обрыва, ветер трепал её косу, а внизу, в долине, она видела, как сверкают молнии над лесом, где жили две другие феи. Она знала о них - ветер приносил ей запахи дубовой коры и речной прохлады, обрывки смеха и мерцание чьих-то крыльев. Но встречаться не доводилось. - Цин, - сказала она, когда др

🤩6427🔥13

18 May 2026, 15:10 UTC671 views116 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Найя, фея воды #акварель и #цветныекарандаши На следующее утро Хлоя решила навестить подругу. Лесная тропа убегала вниз, к реке, путаясь в корнях, похожих на спины дремлющих черепах. В воздухе пахло влажным мхом и чем-то сладким, как если бы где-то поблизости только что испекли медовый хлеб. Хлоя перепрыгивала через ручьи, и каждый раз ей казалось, что из воды выглядывает любопытное округлое личико - не то дух ручья

🔥8325👍8

6 May 2026, 14:17 UTC673 views64 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

В самой милой компании рисую подругу Хлои - Найя, фея воды. Возможно, что в процессе внесу изменения #арт #иллюстрация #сказка

32custom 598999886833333416829🤩3

4 May 2026, 14:39 UTC720 views46 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

May the fourth be with you! Моя мини-подборка по ЗВ В неофициальный День "Звездных войн" аналитики Nielsen решили подсчитать, сколько времени фанаты джедаев потратили на просмотр любимых фильмов в течение года. Результат интересный - общее время смотрения франшизы ЗВ на линейном ТВ и в потоковых сервисах оценивается в 33 млрд минут (примерно 550 млн часов). Номер один во вселенной "Звездных войн" остается "Новая на

👏19custom 598999886833333416815🥰12

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @lanadanilova_art. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Собака-рисовака
@sobaka_risovaka · 32,926
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Лана Данилова | Иллюстрации и заметки” (@lanadanilova_art), 1,223 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lanadanilova_art.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.