Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for La_Preuve_Authentique

Channel

La_Preuve_Authentique

@lapreuveauthentique

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

676subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001840428609
TypeChannel
Username@lapreuveauthentique
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/lapreuveauthentique

Growth

6686766727 August 2026 — 671 subscribers8 August 2026 — 671 subscribers8 August 2026 — 672 subscribers15 August 2026 — 669 subscribers23 August 2026 — 671 subscribers31 August 2026 — 668 subscribers10 September 2026 — 676 subscribers7 August 202610 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 34 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 667–677 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 08:41676+8
31 Aug 2026, 11:36668-3
23 Aug 2026, 15:04671+2
15 Aug 2026, 17:48669-3
8 Aug 2026, 08:25672+1
8 Aug 2026, 02:33671no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:22671first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 47s
Average length
2m 54s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

60 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3863.3%
👍1728.3%
👎23.33%
👏23.33%
🔥11.67%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 60 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 15:13 UTC67 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @abuluanalalbaniVideo

𝐋𝐞 𝐡𝐚𝐝𝐢̂𝐭𝐡 𝐝𝐮 𝐍𝐞𝐣𝐝 : 𝐋𝐚 𝐟𝐢𝐧 𝐝’𝐮𝐧 𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐬𝐨𝐧𝐠𝐞

3

7 Aug 2026, 06:04 UTC103 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🇸🇦 Al hamdoullilah, le pays où la Chari3a est le plus appliquée. Pendant qu’en France, au nom des droits de l’homme et de la démocratie, c’est du sursis ou une prison avec protection, où il est nourri avec tes cotisations… puis, à sa sortie, il fera pareil à d’autres enfants.

7👍1

6 Aug 2026, 08:39 UTC140 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Quelques personnes ont visiblement quitté le canal après le post sur le Cheikh Mansour Al Khalidi. Cela n’a sûrement pas plu à certains, qui pensent sans doute mieux connaître la situation des mashaykh que les savants qui ont été interrogés.

👍42👏1

5 Aug 2026, 22:50 UTC166 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Écrit par le frère Saïd Abou Nousseyba

👎2👍1

5 Aug 2026, 22:49 UTC172 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

❪❓❫ الســـــــؤال: [ أحسن الله إليكم شيخناالفاضل ما حال الشيخ منصور بن ناصر الخالدي ؟ جزاكم الله خيرا ونفع الله بكم ] 🔹الجــــــواب:على خير وجادة ▪️المصــــــدر: قناة اللآلئ الحسان لحفظ فتاوي الشيخ طلعت زهران 🔗 رابط الفتوى: ( https://t.me/Ellalilhissan/92477 ) ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ ❪❓❫ Question posée au Cheikh Tal3at Zahrân حفظه الله : Qu'Allah soit bienfaisant envers vous, notre éminent Cheikh. Que pouvez-vous

👍2

5 Aug 2026, 09:50 UTC185 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

On voit ici, encore une fois, que les savants salafiyyûn ont du respect et de la considération pour le cheikh Mansour. Malgré cela, certains, notamment de très jeunes frères qui se disent Salafi et parfois des plus âgées essaient de remettre en cause le minhaj du cheikh Mansour sans avancer de réelles preuves, et sans même qu’un savant les ait précédés dans leurs propos. J’en ai même entendu un dire : « Il ne fait p

6👍6

5 Aug 2026, 09:48 UTC174 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Rencontre hier entre le cheikh Ibrahim Al Muhaymid et le cheikh Mansour Al Khalidi, qu’Allah les préserve. Le cheikh Ibrahim Al Muhaymid les a invités chez lui à Médine. Le cheikh Ibrahim Al Muhaymid est un savant de Médine qui appelle au tawhid dans différents pays d’Afrique depuis plus de 20 ans, où le shirk et les sectes sont très présents. Qu’Allah le préserve et le récompense.

4

2 Aug 2026, 20:47 UTC210 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

❌ IsalamRappel Vérifiez bien les pages et comptes de rappel religieux avant de propager leur contenu, comme ici avec la dénommée page @IsalamRappel que je vois être partagée. Déjà, rien que l’écriture du mot Islam : ils ont volontairement écrit Isalam. C’est sans aucun doute un juif derrière ce compte. Il poste des paroles sans sources et les attribue à des savants salafis, notamment des mensonges sur la Palestine

7

1 Aug 2026, 07:26 UTC212 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @sounnahconferences

🇩🇿 Les canaux des différents machâykh d'Algérie : 🔸Le cheikh Nadjîb Djelouâh حفظه الله تعالى : t.me/abouaymendjelouah [fr] t.me/abouaymendjelouahFr 🔸Le cheikh Salîm Moûrîda حفظه الله تعالى : t.me/eltabsira t.me/eltabsirada3wia 🔸Le cheikh Aboû Oussâma حفظه الله تعالى : t.me/ellwamiee 🔸Le cheikh Mouhammed Tchalâbî حفظه الله تعالى : [Fr] t.me/MTchalabi [Fr] t.me/qrtchalabi 🔸Le cheikh Yâcîne Choûchâr حفظه الله تعالى

2👍1👏1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @lapreuveauthentique. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“La_Preuve_Authentique” (@lapreuveauthentique), 676 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lapreuveauthentique.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.