Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Latropman

Channel

Latropman

@latropman

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

419subscribers

+24 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001362325457
TypeChannel
Username@latropman
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/latropman

Growth

3934214076 August 2026 — 395 subscribers6 August 2026 — 395 subscribers13 August 2026 — 393 subscribers21 August 2026 — 396 subscribers27 August 2026 — 415 subscribers4 September 2026 — 421 subscribers12 September 2026 — 419 subscribers4196 August 202612 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 37 days, net +24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 389–425 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 06:57419-2
4 Sept 2026, 05:59421+6
27 Aug 2026, 08:23415+19
21 Aug 2026, 01:46396+3
13 Aug 2026, 11:13393-2
6 Aug 2026, 19:51395no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:15395first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 5 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

237 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7431.2%
custom 54538785877676600284820.3%
custom 52539505530833757264719.8%
🤯2811.8%
👍187.59%
135.49%
🤔52.11%
🤩31.27%
🎉10.422%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 237 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @latropman. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
5.56%
1 of 18 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
134
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
209
over 17 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzqxJFKD4131 July 202631 July 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 21:51 UTC94 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Рандомный вброс посреди ночи: 10-часовая версия танца из видоса про индийское кино существует уже целых полгода, но по разным причинам ютится лишь в черновиках. Делайте или не делайте с этой инфой что хотите 🤷🏻‍♂️

custom 545387858776766002812🤯7

Signed vitalya

3 Aug 2026, 15:24 UTC118 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

👆🏻Я просто обязан зафиксировать, что наша история из реплая получила-таки развитие! Если кто не помнит или вовсе не в теме, посмотрите там же видос, в котором Миша рассказывает детально, что произошло. Ну, а я просто жду теперь 12 августа!

6👍1🤔1

Signed vitalya

1 Aug 2026, 21:59 UTC168 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

ЧУТОК О НЕЙРОНКАХ Что угодно несёт вред при неправильном подходе. А нейрослоп гарантирован только в тех случаях, когда вместо усложнённых детальных промтов пишут "сделай там ну шоб это... как его... красиво". С хорошей идеей, прописанным сценарием и грамотно поставленной задачей нейронка может стать таким же полезным инструментом, как любая программа для монтажа или создания 3д-графики. Раньше ж кино руками резали

👍531

Signed vitalya

1 Aug 2026, 21:03 UTC121 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Если верить нейронке, общее количество уникальных материалов вышло 282. Из них только фильмов - 171. Посему решил не засирать канал длиннопостами и собрал гугл-таблицу потаймкодово, чтобы желающим было проще ориентироваться при поиске. В листе "Таймкоды" три столбца: в первом, собственно, таймкоды вышедшего ролика, во втором - название содержания, а в третьем - таймкод этого самого содержания в оригинале. В нём они

👍5🤩21

Signed vitalya

31 Jul 2026, 18:01 UTC134 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2VtzqxJFKD4

Пока собирал этот видос, поймал несколько тревожек и пару неплохих скримеров от якутских киноделов. Как оказалось, думерских фильмов у нас более, чем дохрена: пока что я насчитал в папке 145 скачанных, но не все переименовывал. Думаю выйдет под 160 минимум. Завтра выложу весь список использованных. И вы там определённо найдёте для себя депресняковые алмазы. А теперь, пожалуй, редкое явление на моём андеграундовом ка

12👍2🤔1

Signed vitalya

27 Jul 2026, 14:50 UTC209 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

⚡️ Наконец-то, релизнулось! Случился очередной офигенский экспириенс по сборке того, в чём я вообще не шарю, но оказалось, что я почти все моменты подобрал как надо. Добавлю ещё, что Миша своим рассказом продал мне игру, хоть я и вряд ли залечу в неё когда-нибудь. Тем не менее, видос обязателен к просмотру! анкаты ко всему, что вышло и выйдет, получится намутить только в августе, щас надо оч усиленно доделать ещё од

7custom 52539505530833757262

Signed vitalya

25 Jul 2026, 10:55 UTC218 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026

⚡️BREAKING NEWS от DAILY BUGLE: анонимный источник предоставил нашей редакции эксклюзивный материал, связанный с так называемым народным супергероем Человеком-пауком. Мы отсмотрели данный документальный фильм об этом подлом преступнике. Внимание: кадры не для слабонервных! Вот оно доказательство! Доказательство того, что Человек-паук... [смотреть далее]

10custom 52539505530833757263custom 54538785877676600282

Signed vitalya

24 Jul 2026, 22:22 UTC200 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Уот так уот получилось. Выйдет, скорее всего, сегодня. А прям после него ещё один, так что ушёл собирать дальше. хотя куда я ушёл, я же и так дома... а не вдали от него...

custom 5453878587767660028123🤩1

Signed vitalya

21 Jul 2026, 19:25 UTC230 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Ещё одна деталь из второго трейлера нового Человека-паука: в паре сцен были услышаны нотки, схожие с теми, что звучали в трейлере первого сезона Apex Legends, да и вообще главного апексового саундтрека. Эти синты в ревербе, напоминающие гидролокатор подлодки, почему-то любил всегда, а тут они добавляют какого-то веса, значимости и таинственности: есть в них что-то... глубинное. А если нахожу их в каких-нибудь песнях

9custom 54538785877676600281

Signed vitalya

20 Jul 2026, 14:01 UTC208 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

САМТЫНГС КАМИНГ В Marvel начинается какая-то мрачнявая эпоха. Не в плохом смысле, а в настроенческом. Но если сравнивать трейлер нового Человека-Паука и трейлер будущих Мстителей, то первого я жду гораздо больше, чем вторых, где снова все встанут в кружок спиной друг к другу, чтобы сражаться с несоразмерными злодеусами злеями. Кароч, эпика безусловно валом, но пафоса больше.

custom 5453878587767660028611

Signed vitalya

19 Jul 2026, 20:01 UTC198 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Сколько раз смотрел «Мстители: Финал», но только сейчас заметил, что одна реплика на космолёте, вероятно, доснималась намного позже, так как в ней отличается вообще всё: оптика, крупность, освещение, цветкор и задники хромака (особенно по чёткости заметно за Старком). И есть ощущение, что их вообще снимали отдельно друг от друга, так как персы плавают в кадре неестественно. Прикол, конечно, как сюжет может захватить

🤯18

Signed vitalya

19 Jul 2026, 07:04 UTC210 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Априори, уличные повара и слишком деловые подростки: долгожданная третья часть из списка «Что бесит Витальку». Пользуйтесь, если он задолжал вам видос или еще как-то балуется. Для тех, кто не в теме: у Витали довольно большой список того, что бесит, и в какой-то момент мы начали записывать в заметки: я пишу то, что бесит его, он — то, что бесит меня. Так набралось уже 34 пункта, предыдущие части здесь: — первая ч

custom 525395055308337572671

Signed D

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @latropman. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

КШИШТОВСКИЙ
@kshishtovsky · 25,442
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Latropman” (@latropman), 419 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/latropman.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.