Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ЛАВКА

Channel

ЛАВКА

@lavka_4y

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

399subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001851188292
TypeChannel
Username@lavka_4y
Created18 January 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/lavka_4y

Growth

396399397.56 August 2026 — 397 subscribers6 August 2026 — 397 subscribers29 August 2026 — 396 subscribers5 September 2026 — 399 subscribers6 August 20265 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 30 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 396–399 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 07:40399+3
29 Aug 2026, 07:52396-1
6 Aug 2026, 19:51397no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:59397first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 3 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

14 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥14100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 3 April 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Jul 2026, 21:09 UTC27 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @dumayemPhoto

На сканах — ответ Прокуратуры адвокату прабабушки Ники Останиной, суть которого — не суйтесь не в свои дела. И ещё 5 листов — результат прокурорской проверки господина Тимоыеева (хвала проверявшим!), которая нашла конфликт интересов у этого добывателя маленькой девочки, которая как игрушка была заказана ему его супругой. Что мы имеем? Документ является официальным представлением прокуратуры Солецкого района об устр

28 Jul 2026, 21:09 UTC35 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @semyaprava

☝ Спасибо, Вячеслав Иванович @dumayem В антикоррупционный комитет напишем. В суде этот документ благополучно проигнорирован, по мнению судей - не имеет отношения к делу (ну вот такое вот независимое правосудие в Новгородской области). Переписка с прокуратурой на территории Новгородской области на всех уровнях, составляет уже несколько десятков писем, вопрос по данному документу игнорируется. Результаты проверки

19 Jun 2026, 15:34 UTC139 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @semyapravaPhoto

Новости по делу детей Самаркиных. Вы только посмотрите, какие у нас наивные чиновники и начальник отдела по делам несовершеннолетних УМВД России по городскому округу Домодедово А.А. Продан, врио начальника полиции Чудинов А.И. и дознаватель лейтенант Волков Д.В. Они снова допрашивали детей в доме опекуна Сомкиной и верят полученным таким образом данным и опекуну на слово. Причём таскаемая опекуном за волосы девочк

17 Jun 2026, 17:12 UTC97 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @semyapravaVideo

Друзья, представляем Вашему вниманию третий выпуск программы нашего цикла «Битва за семью: Диагноз как приговор» с нашим адвокатом Надеждой Гольцовой и врачом психиатром Алисой Мороз. Ограничение и лишение родительских прав на основании наличия психиатрического диагноза прямо запрещено законом о психиатрической помощи, но на практике сам факт наличия психического расстройства часто автоматически становится основание

15 Jun 2026, 17:09 UTC88 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @semyapravaPhoto

Друзья, это какая-то жесть. Сегодня наши адвокаты Евгения Суббота и Алла Макарова вместе с Ольгой Михайловной Адамович были в Следственном комитете, где им сообщили, что из Центрального аппарата Следственного комитета России уголовное дело, касающееся взятия под опеку Ники Останиной, снова спустили в крошечный межрайонный старорусский отдел Новгородской области. Там снова возбуждено уголовное дело. И ОНО СНОВА ОТМЕ

2 Jun 2026, 06:56 UTC94 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @semyapravaVideo

Друзья, представляем Вашему вниманию первый выпуск программы нашего цикла «Битва за семью: Право воспитания» с адвокатом Надеждой Александровной Гольцовой и уголовным адвокатом Дмитрием Викторовичем Пикуновым. https://youtu.be/qKXGxOSVcZE Аудиоверсия: https://t.me/semyaprava/16469 Спасибо всем причастным 🩷

🔥7

3 Apr 2026, 12:41 UTC194 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @semyapravaPhoto

Приглашаем журналистов и слушателей! Время: 9 апреля 2026 года 9:30 утра Место: Новгородский районный суд Новгородской области г. Великий Новгород, ул. Октябрьская, д. 15 Истец: Ольга Адамович, будет оспаривать передачу под предварительную опеку своей правнучки Ники Останиной в семью новгородского госслужащего - главы Солецкого округа Максима Тимофеева и его жены Надежды. Правосудие у нас в стране открытое, тайны

🔥4

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @lavka_4y. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ЛАВКА” (@lavka_4y), 399 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lavka_4y.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.