Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 📚 LAW STUDENTS © 📚

Channel

📚 LAW STUDENTS © 📚

@lawstuden

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

16,921subscribers

+67 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001209972753
TypeChannel
Username@lawstuden
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/lawstuden

Growth

16,85416,92116,887.56 August 2026 — 16,854 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,858 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,866 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,863 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,862 subscribers13 August 2026 — 16,869 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,883 subscribers16 August 2026 — 16,878 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,874 subscribers18 August 2026 — 16,884 subscribers19 August 2026 — 16,883 subscribers20 August 2026 — 16,886 subscribers21 August 2026 — 16,896 subscribers23 August 2026 — 16,905 subscribers25 August 2026 — 16,893 subscribers25 August 2026 — 16,889 subscribers26 August 2026 — 16,890 subscribers27 August 2026 — 16,889 subscribers29 August 2026 — 16,897 subscribers30 August 2026 — 16,903 subscribers31 August 2026 — 16,898 subscribers1 September 2026 — 16,905 subscribers2 September 2026 — 16,914 subscribers2 September 2026 — 16,906 subscribers4 September 2026 — 16,921 subscribers6 August 20264 September 2026
25 measurements spanning 29 days, net +67. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,844–16,931 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 12:0216,921+15
2 Sept 2026, 23:1816,906-8
2 Sept 2026, 00:1516,914+9
1 Sept 2026, 01:3616,905+7
31 Aug 2026, 04:1516,898-5
30 Aug 2026, 03:3416,903+6
29 Aug 2026, 02:4716,897+8
27 Aug 2026, 23:4616,889-1
26 Aug 2026, 22:2416,890+1
25 Aug 2026, 23:1716,889-4
25 Aug 2026, 02:3416,893-12
23 Aug 2026, 15:0616,905+9
21 Aug 2026, 23:5516,896+10
20 Aug 2026, 16:1216,886+3
19 Aug 2026, 17:1316,883-1
18 Aug 2026, 18:0416,884+10
17 Aug 2026, 17:0816,874-4
16 Aug 2026, 08:4616,878-5
14 Aug 2026, 20:0716,883+14
13 Aug 2026, 07:3416,869first reading

Engagement

53 posts held, back to 18 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.0%
avg views ÷ 16,921 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,210
32 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.027%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
32
of 53 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 32 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held53 (18 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total102,609
Reactions total14
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 09:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

19 reactions across 15 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 94.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1894.7%
😁15.26%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 53 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 18:33 UTC788 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Poll

According to Section 28, are entries in books of account alone sufficient evidence to charge any person with liability?

  1. A) Yes, they are conclusive proof12%
  2. B) No, such statements shall not alone be sufficient evidence77%
  3. C) Yes, if they are maintained electronically8%
  4. D) Yes, if signed by an auditor3%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1

Signed ASIF ALI

1 Sept 2026, 18:33 UTC≈1,790 viewsread 3 September 2026
Poll

Under Section 23, a confession made to a police officer shall:

  1. A) Be proved as against a person accused of any offence15%
  2. B) Not be proved as against a person accused of any offence78%
  3. C) Be proved only in civil cases4%
  4. D) Be proved if it is written down2%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed ASIF ALI

31 Aug 2026, 18:32 UTC≈2,350 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Poll

According to Section 22, a confession made by an accused person is irrelevant in a criminal proceeding if it appears to have been caused by:

  1. A) Remorse2%
  2. B) Any inducement, threat, coercion or promise having reference to the charge against the accused93%
  3. C) A desire to tell the truth4%
  4. D) Voluntary submission2%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1

Signed ASIF ALI

30 Aug 2026, 18:33 UTC858 viewsread 3 September 2026

Under Section 20, when are oral admissions as to the contents of documents relevant? A) They are always relevant regardless of the document B) Never relevant C) Only when the party proposing to prove them shows he is entitled to give secondary evidence or unless the genuineness of the document is in question D) Only when the original document is present in court

Signed ASIF ALI

29 Aug 2026, 18:33 UTC942 viewsread 3 September 2026

How is an "Admission" defined under Section 15? A) A strictly written confession given to a magistrate B) A statement, oral or documentary or contained in electronic form, which suggests any inference as to any fact in issue or relevant fact C) A conclusive proof of guilt D) A statement made only by a legal representative

Signed ASIF ALI

28 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC≈3,680 viewsread 3 September 2026
Poll

According to Section 14, when there is a question whether a particular act was done, what becomes a relevant fact?

  1. A) The existence of any course of business according to which it naturally would have been done80%
  2. B) The public opinion about the act11%
  3. C) The amount of damages claimed6%
  4. D) The character of the person who reported the act3%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed ASIF ALI

27 Aug 2026, 18:34 UTC≈3,720 viewsread 3 September 2026
Poll

Under Section 13, when there is a question whether an act was accidental or intentional, which fact is relevant?

  1. A) The fact that the accused apologised6%
  2. B) The fact that such act formed part of a series of similar occurrences88%
  3. C) The financial status of the victim3%
  4. D) The location where the act occurred3%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed ASIF ALI

27 Aug 2026, 14:41 UTC931 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026

When the question is as to the existence of any right or custom under Section 11, which of the following is relevant? A) Any transaction by which the right or custom was created, claimed, modified, recognised, asserted or denied B) Only the personal opinions of the neighbors C) Only rights established by the Supreme Court D) Only written customs

1

Signed ASIF ALI

27 Aug 2026, 04:25 UTC≈3,580 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Poll

Under Section 45, a person abets the doing of a thing who:

  1. A) Instigates any person to do that thing5%
  2. B) Engages with one or more other persons in any conspiracy for doing that thing27%
  3. C) Intentionally aids, by any act or illegal omission, the doing of that thing10%
  4. D) All of the above58%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1

Signed ASIF ALI

25 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC≈3,970 viewsread 3 September 2026
Poll

According to Section 9, facts not otherwise relevant become relevant if:

  1. A) They are interesting to the jury4%
  2. B) They are reported in a newspaper7%
  3. C) They are inconsistent with any fact in issue or relevant fact82%
  4. D) They are supported by a single witness8%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed ASIF ALI

24 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC≈1,150 viewsread 3 September 2026

Under Section 8, things said or done by a conspirator in reference to a common design are relevant when: A) The trial has concluded B) There is reasonable ground to believe that two or more persons have conspired together to commit an offence C) The conspirator is physically present in the courtroom D) The statement is made after the conspiracy has ended completely

Signed ASIF ALI

23 Aug 2026, 18:33 UTC≈4,740 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Poll

Section 7 makes relevant those facts that are necessary to:

  1. A) Explain or introduce a fact in issue or relevant fact61%
  2. B) Completely prove the guilt of the accused without further evidence30%
  3. C) Establish the credibility of a witness6%
  4. D) Contradict a previously recorded judgment3%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1

Signed ASIF ALI

Showing the 12 most recent of 53 posts we hold for @lawstuden. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 41 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Sept 2026, 18:33 UTCAnonymous Quiz206 voters

According to Section 28, are entries in books of account alone sufficient evidence to charge any person with liability?

  1. A) Yes, they are conclusive proof12%
  2. B) No, such statements shall not alone be sufficient evidence77%
  3. C) Yes, if they are maintained electronically8%
  4. D) Yes, if signed by an auditor3%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Sept 2026, 18:33 UTCAnonymous Quiz402 voters

Under Section 23, a confession made to a police officer shall:

  1. A) Be proved as against a person accused of any offence15%
  2. B) Not be proved as against a person accused of any offence78%
  3. C) Be proved only in civil cases4%
  4. D) Be proved if it is written down2%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

31 Aug 2026, 18:32 UTCAnonymous Quiz453 voters

According to Section 22, a confession made by an accused person is irrelevant in a criminal proceeding if it appears to have been caused by:

  1. A) Remorse2%
  2. B) Any inducement, threat, coercion or promise having reference to the charge against the accused93%
  3. C) A desire to tell the truth4%
  4. D) Voluntary submission2%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTCAnonymous Quiz559 voters

According to Section 14, when there is a question whether a particular act was done, what becomes a relevant fact?

  1. A) The existence of any course of business according to which it naturally would have been done80%
  2. B) The public opinion about the act11%
  3. C) The amount of damages claimed6%
  4. D) The character of the person who reported the act3%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27 Aug 2026, 18:34 UTCAnonymous Quiz527 voters

Under Section 13, when there is a question whether an act was accidental or intentional, which fact is relevant?

  1. A) The fact that the accused apologised6%
  2. B) The fact that such act formed part of a series of similar occurrences88%
  3. C) The financial status of the victim3%
  4. D) The location where the act occurred3%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27 Aug 2026, 04:25 UTCAnonymous Quiz540 voters

Under Section 45, a person abets the doing of a thing who:

  1. A) Instigates any person to do that thing5%
  2. B) Engages with one or more other persons in any conspiracy for doing that thing27%
  3. C) Intentionally aids, by any act or illegal omission, the doing of that thing10%
  4. D) All of the above58%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Judiciary Gold
@JudiciaryGold · 33,047
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 4 September 2026
PW Law Wallah JUDICIARY
@pwlawwallah · 84,235
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“📚 LAW STUDENTS © 📚” (@lawstuden), 16,921 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lawstuden.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.