Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Юрист о персональных данных

Channel

Юрист о персональных данных

@lawyer_dataprivacy

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,470subscribers

+42 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001913678853
TypeChannel
Username@lawyer_dataprivacy
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/lawyer_dataprivacy

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,4183,4703,4447 August 2026 — 3,428 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,428 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,430 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,428 subscribers20 August 2026 — 3,425 subscribers24 August 2026 — 3,431 subscribers27 August 2026 — 3,427 subscribers30 August 2026 — 3,426 subscribers2 September 2026 — 3,425 subscribers5 September 2026 — 3,422 subscribers10 September 2026 — 3,419 subscribers14 September 2026 — 3,418 subscribers18 September 2026 — 3,470 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 42 days, net +42. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,410–3,478 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 21:193,470+52
14 Sept 2026, 05:573,418-1
10 Sept 2026, 13:173,419-3
5 Sept 2026, 13:363,422-3
2 Sept 2026, 00:053,425-1
30 Aug 2026, 02:193,426-1
27 Aug 2026, 02:533,427-4
24 Aug 2026, 08:033,431+6
20 Aug 2026, 16:123,425-3
17 Aug 2026, 10:043,428-2
13 Aug 2026, 08:033,430+2
7 Aug 2026, 13:183,428no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:483,428first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 29 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

180 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥8145.0%
7340.6%
👍168.89%
👌63.33%
❤‍🔥31.67%
👏10.556%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 180 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2026, 05:45 UTC426 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⚠️ Мнение коллеги: что считать биометрическими персональными данными? Профессиональное сообщество регулярно возвращается к вопросу: в каких случаях персональные данные становятся биометрическими❓️ Рекомендую обратить внимание на позицию экcперта в области информационной безопасности и безопасности бизнеса Михаила Емельянникова. Основные тезисы: 🔹 Вопрос отнесения данных к биометрическим, прежде всего, техничес

🔥42

Signed Наталья Алешкова

21 Jul 2026, 05:45 UTC625 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⁉️ Как оптимизировать процесс получения согласий работников при использовании сторонних систем ❓ Рабочие процессы компании строятся на использовании информационных сервисов: 1С, КЭДО, CRM-систем, облачных платформ и др. Работа таких систем предполагает поручение обработки персональных данных третьему лицу. Например в web-версии 1С или CRM персональные данные обрабатывает провайдер сервиса, а техподдержка системы мо

9

Signed Наталья Алешкова

16 Jul 2026, 05:45 UTC643 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⁉️ Может ли работодатель предоставлять персональные данные по запросам государственных органов❓️ Да, может. Основанием для передачи является надлежащим образом оформленный письменный запрос от должностного лица соответствующей структуры. Если представители пришли лично, они должны предъявить служебные удостоверения и документы, подтверждающие полномочия и цель получения информации. ☝️ Передавать копии документов

🔥3

Signed Наталья Алешкова

14 Jul 2026, 08:12 UTC720 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⁉️ Можно ли распространять персональные данные на основании договора без оформления отдельного согласия❓️ Обязанность оператора брать согласие на распространение информации описана в статье 10.1 Закона «О персональных данных» № 152‑ФЗ. НО! На мой взгляд, эта статья не содержит положения о том, что распространение персональных данных возможно ТОЛЬКО на основании отдельного согласия либо прямого указания закона. При

🔥17

Signed Наталья Алешкова

10 Jul 2026, 10:02 UTC714 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Очень люблю то, чем занимаюсь❤️ Сегодня дала комментарии телеканалу 78 по вопросам неточностей в персональных данных, последствиях таких неточностей и нарушениях прав граждан на защиту!

19👍4🔥3👏1

Signed Наталья Алешкова

8 Jul 2026, 05:31 UTC747 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

❓Персональные данные и подрядчики: кто отвечает за утечку❓ Можно передать на аутсорс обслуживание ИСПДн, хранение ПДн или техническую поддержку. НО! Судебная практика показывает: если произошла утечка, отвечать будет оператор. 📌 В деле № А27-27136/2025 (Решение арбитражного суда Кемеровской области от 19.01.2026) произошла утечка данных после кибератаки на инфраструктуру компании. В открытый доступ попали данные ра

6👌1

Signed Наталья Алешкова

7 Jul 2026, 16:27 UTC581 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Новый этап💪

🔥42

Signed Наталья Алешкова

6 Jul 2026, 19:38 UTC699 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

2️⃣ июля я была спикером на мероприятии, посвященном 20-летию Закона о персональных данных, которое организовал Lukash & Partners. День получился насыщенным: актуальные доклады, дискуссии, обмен опытом с коллегами и, конечно, новые полезные знакомства. Особенно интересно было обсуждать практические кейсы, с которыми специалисты сталкиваются ежедневно. Среди тем, которые обсуждались: 🔹 тенденции развития законодате

11🔥3

Signed Наталья Алешкова

3 Jul 2026, 06:31 UTC694 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Передача данных работников в рамках тендерных и закупочных процедур При проведении закупок заказчики могут устанавливать требования о предоставлении данных о работниках участника. Такая информация может включать квалификацию, опыт и трудовую деятельность сотрудника. Это необходимо для подтверждения наличия у участника закупки квалифицированного персонала. Например для определения подрядчика на выполнение проектно-и

👌43

Signed Наталья Алешкова

26 Jun 2026, 08:50 UTC849 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Практика 2026 года: на что обращают внимание суды 📌 В деле № А27-27136/2025 АС Кемеровской области от 19.01.2026 инфраструктура ООО Торговый дом «Автоматизированные системы контроля» подверглась DDoS-атаке, в результате которой персональные данные двух субъектов оказались в открытом доступе. Компания в течение 24 часов уведомила Роскомнадзор об инциденте, организовала внутреннее расследование и в 72-часовой срок пр

7👍3

Signed Наталья Алешкова

25 Jun 2026, 07:50 UTC698 viewsread 7 August 2026

Коллеги, добрый день! Поделитесь, пожалуйста, в комментариях информацией о том, с какими SaaS сервисами Вы чаще все работаете? Заключаете ли Вы с ними поручение обработки?

Signed Наталья Алешкова

24 Jun 2026, 07:09 UTC774 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Я выступаю спикером на ФИНПРАВ ФОРУМЕ приглашаю вас поучаствовать Мы разберём то, о чём обычно узнают уже после проблем 💸 На форуме разберем темы: — как не получить доначисления от ФНС — где бизнес теряет деньги на налогах — как селлеров «ловят» на маркетплейсах — реальные риски АУСН, о которых молчат — как сотрудничество с самозанятыми превращается в штрафы — как избежать проблем с персональными данными и рекламой

👌1

Signed Наталья Алешкова

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @lawyer_dataprivacy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Jun 2026, 09:15 UTCAnonymous Poll42 voters

Коллеги, добрый день! Есть идея провести интенсив в июле. Проголосуйте, пожалуйста, если вам интересно🙏🏻

  1. Да, я за83%
  2. Не интересно17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 29 May 2026 to 27 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

РоскомнадZор
@rkn_tg · 63,811
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 August 2026
Privacy Advocates
@prv_adv · 21,945
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 22 September 2026
ТРУДОВЫЕ СПОРЫ
@sudpraktik_trud · 26,918
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 September 2026
Клуб правообладателей
@bchlaw · 27,259
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 September 2026
ФАС России | FAS Russia
@fasrussia · 33,808
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Юрист о персональных данных” (@lawyer_dataprivacy), 3,470 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lawyer_dataprivacy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.