Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 42 days, net -227. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,429–6,724 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 23:17
6,463
-26
14 Sept 2026, 08:16
6,489
-19
11 Sept 2026, 02:55
6,508
-23
6 Sept 2026, 11:57
6,531
-15
2 Sept 2026, 13:06
6,546
-22
30 Aug 2026, 14:47
6,568
-23
27 Aug 2026, 13:05
6,591
-17
24 Aug 2026, 11:07
6,608
-18
20 Aug 2026, 16:42
6,626
-12
17 Aug 2026, 22:17
6,638
-16
15 Aug 2026, 05:03
6,654
-17
11 Aug 2026, 18:16
6,671
-17
8 Aug 2026, 11:32
6,688
-2
7 Aug 2026, 15:00
6,690
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:58
6,690
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 2 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 39s
Average length
20s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8,862 reactions across 20 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💩
4,327
48.8%
🔥
999
11.3%
👍
645
7.28%
👎
566
6.39%
❤
438
4.94%
🤮
323
3.64%
🖕
256
2.89%
😢
255
2.88%
😱
233
2.63%
🤯
230
2.60%
🤔
227
2.56%
🤬
87
0.982%
🍌
51
0.575%
🤡
50
0.564%
😡
24
0.271%
👏
23
0.26%
🥰
22
0.248%
🐳
21
0.237%
😁
15
0.169%
🤣
14
0.158%
12 further kinds
56
0.632%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,862 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 April 2025 to 21 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The final phase before the edgenOS mainnet has now concluded with edgenOS light node on the browser extension coming to an end.
On edgenOS mainnet, users would be able to still run and host a light node on their own by simply following the steps here (note: there's no ongoing phase):
https://github.com/Layer-Edge/light-node
Users can still track their contributions via the dashboard: dashboard.layeredge.io/
Stay t…
Feeless Bridge is Now Live: Bridge from Edgen Chain to BSC
You can now bridge $EDGEN from Edgen Chain to Binance Smart Chain — no gas fees required. Experience seamless transfers powered by Hyperlane.
Bridge Now: https://bridge.layeredge.io
How to Bridge from Edgen Chain to BSC:
(1) Go to https://bridge.layeredge.io
(2) Connect your wallet
(3) Enter the amount & recipient
(4) Confirm — funds arrive within 24 hours…
All tokens from the LayerEdge Community Round have now been fully distributed.
A huge thank you to everyone who participated early and believed in the mission.
Let’s build. 🫡
→ https://layeredge.foundation/community-round
The $EDGEN Claimer is closing on 2nd July. Don’t miss out.
How to claim your $EDGEN?
-> Go to airdrop.layeredge.foundation
-> Connect your wallet
-> Check your allocation
-> Claim your tokens on-chain to your wallet address
How to add Edgen Chain to your wallet ?
• Visit docs.layeredge.io/docs/guide/edgenChain
• Click “Add Network” — it will automatically connect Edgen Chain to your wallet.
To add chain manually:
Add a custom network with these details:
• Network Name: Edgen Chain
• RPC URL: https://rpc.layeredge.io
• Chain ID: 4207
• Currency Symbol: EDGEN
• Block Explorer URL: https://edgenscan.io
MAY MONTHLY RECAP
A People backed internet powered by everyday devices, turned into verifiers fueling a trust native web.
From the $EDGEN TGE to edgenOS going live, from Airdrop 1 to global exchange listings, progress this month set the stage for what’s coming:
Tweet Link: https://x.com/layeredge/status/1934867868124107114
Blog Link: https://blog.layeredge.io/may-monthly-recap-what-weve-built-launched-and-learned…
$EDGEN Staking is Now Live!
Stake your $EDGEN tokens today and start earning rewards through our tiered staking. The earlier you stake, the higher the rewards—FCFS.
Bonus incentives for edgenOS participants. More info soon.
Get full details here: https://docs.layeredge.io/docs/guide/staking
Bridged your $EDGEN tokens but can't see them in your wallet?
Don’t worry — You just need to import them manually.
Here’s how:
- Open your EVM wallet
- Click “Import Tokens”
Paste the correct contract address for the chain you bridged to:
Ethereum: 0xAa9806c938836627Ed1a41Ae871c7E1889AE02Ca
BNB Chain: 0x0c808f0464c423d5ea4f4454fcc23b6e2ae75562
Confirm by tapping “Add” or “Import.”
Once added, you'll be able…
We’re kicking off on June 1st for our community round at 10:30 AM UTC with 1-hour exclusive access for our early users via: http://layeredge.foundation/community-round
If any allocation remains, general access opens at 11:30 AM UTC for 11 hours.
-> 100% unlock at TGE
-> 100% of contributions are moved into on-chain liquidity.
-> Only our existing users are eligible for 1 hour early access
Cap: 0.1 ETH per wallet
T…
Introducing edgenOS Light Node: World’s first People-Backed zk verifier light client
edgenOS Light Node by LayerEdge verifies zk proofs in real time.
It’s the first people-backed verification network where everyday devices help scale decentralized verification infrastructure — just by running a browser extension.
Download Extension here: http://chromewebstore.google.com/detail/edgenos-light-node-layere/fnjlbckpopj…
We’re excited to unveil the refreshed identity of LayerEdge and the People-Backed Internet vision powering it.
Explore our new website: https://layeredge.io
Watch the launch video: https://x.com/layeredge/status/1927830418583158977
Read the article here: https://x.com/layeredge/status/1927826682133586170
April Monthly Recap
In April, we wrapped up Testnet Phase II, ran Proof of Humanity (PoH) for fair and Sybil-resistant rewards, launched token utility, and revealed our Road to Mainnet.
Tweet Link: https://x.com/layeredge/status/1920940090240467021
Blog Link: https://blog.layeredge.io/layeredge-april-recap-milestones-on-the-road-to-a-verifiable-internet-976d7aa60692
🔥177👍73💩48❤41🥰13👏12🍌5👎4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @layeredgeannouncements. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@layeredgeannouncements named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@francis_berwa named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Hemi -- News & Updates @hemi_news · 33,887 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 3 September 2026
$RWAINC Announcements @RWA_Inc_Announcements · 40,878 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 August 2026
Self Chain @selfchainxyz · 107,189 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
Allora Network Announcements @alloranetworkannouncements · 54,245 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 August 2026
MoreNews @morenewsxyz · 31,586 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 5 September 2026
Morph Layer Announcement @MorphL2announcement · 652,234 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
Kontos Announcements by Zecrey Labs @ZecreyAnnouncement · 23,185 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 September 2026
Blazpay Announcement @BlazpayAnnouncement · 28,432 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 September 2026
Dill Announcement @dill_announcement · 57,900 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
Allo VIP @allo_xyz · 77,560 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 18 August 2026
Glacier News @glacier_news · 72,190 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 August 2026
Infinite Seas @infiniteseasdev · 49,129 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“LayerEdge Announcements” (@layeredgeannouncements), 6,463 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/layeredgeannouncements.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.