Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🇬🇧 Английский для ленивых 🇬🇧

Channel

🇬🇧 Английский для ленивых 🇬🇧

@laz_english

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,383subscribers

-93 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001146585576
TypeChannel
Username@laz_english
Created16 September 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/laz_english

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

8,3838,4768,429.56 August 2026 — 8,476 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,475 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,473 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,463 subscribers17 August 2026 — 8,461 subscribers20 August 2026 — 8,452 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,446 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,438 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,431 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,421 subscribers6 September 2026 — 8,409 subscribers11 September 2026 — 8,401 subscribers14 September 2026 — 8,397 subscribers19 September 2026 — 8,383 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 44 days, net -93. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,369–8,490 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 03:578,383-14
14 Sept 2026, 16:428,397-4
11 Sept 2026, 11:228,401-8
6 Sept 2026, 16:208,409-12
1 Sept 2026, 23:268,421-10
29 Aug 2026, 21:378,431-7
26 Aug 2026, 20:028,438-8
24 Aug 2026, 04:078,446-6
20 Aug 2026, 02:458,452-9
17 Aug 2026, 10:258,461-2
13 Aug 2026, 17:288,463-10
10 Aug 2026, 12:148,473-2
7 Aug 2026, 01:508,475-1
6 Aug 2026, 04:158,476first reading

Engagement

110 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.01%
avg views ÷ 8,383 subscribers
Avg views / post
169
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
10
of 110 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held110 (1 August 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total1,685
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 17:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

Showing the 12 most recent of 110 posts we hold for @laz_english. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

🇬🇧 Learn English 🇬🇧
@ieltstoeflcefrr · 65,374
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 August 2026
Английский язык
@Angliyskiy_yaziki · 34,281
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 3 September 2026
Английский с нуля
@anglyski_yazik_plus · 30,360
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 7 September 2026
Английский язык 🇬🇧
@dailyeng · 73,242
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 August 2026
Богатый сосед
@BigBrains · 63,897
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
Чек-листы марафоны
@motionchek · 42,988
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🇬🇧 Английский для ленивых 🇬🇧” (@laz_english), 8,383 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/laz_english.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.