Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Учим флористике: Lacy Bird Academy

Channel

Учим флористике: Lacy Bird Academy

@lbacademy

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

12,753subscribers

-23 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001259523182
TypeChannel
Username@lbacademy
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/lbacademy

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

12,75312,81812,785.57 August 2026 — 12,776 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,772 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,768 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,767 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,764 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,767 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,770 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,774 subscribers15 August 2026 — 12,770 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,771 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,770 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,774 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,777 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,778 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,789 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,807 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,809 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,801 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,802 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,811 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,818 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,812 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,810 subscribers5 September 2026 — 12,786 subscribers8 September 2026 — 12,769 subscribers11 September 2026 — 12,758 subscribers14 September 2026 — 12,757 subscribers16 September 2026 — 12,756 subscribers19 September 2026 — 12,753 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
29 measurements spanning 43 days, net -23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,743–12,828 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 06:5412,753-3
16 Sept 2026, 18:5712,756-1
14 Sept 2026, 19:1812,757-1
11 Sept 2026, 07:5612,758-11
8 Sept 2026, 14:3812,769-17
5 Sept 2026, 06:1612,786-24
3 Sept 2026, 08:4612,810-2
2 Sept 2026, 01:2812,812-6
1 Sept 2026, 02:0512,818+7
28 Aug 2026, 05:4312,811+9
27 Aug 2026, 05:3312,802+1
26 Aug 2026, 02:1512,801-8
25 Aug 2026, 01:0412,809+2
23 Aug 2026, 15:0612,807+18
22 Aug 2026, 03:5512,789+11
20 Aug 2026, 17:0612,778+1
19 Aug 2026, 19:1712,777+3
18 Aug 2026, 20:4812,774+4
17 Aug 2026, 21:2712,770-1
16 Aug 2026, 20:5812,771first reading

Engagement

55 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.65%
avg views ÷ 12,753 subscribers
Avg views / post
848
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.67%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 55 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held55 (2 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total16,120
Reactions total322
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 20:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9m 11s
Average length
46s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,375 reactions across 48 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
44232.1%
🔥39728.9%
😍1309.45%
custom 5402345203623285610926.69%
👍856.18%
❤‍🔥705.09%
🥰261.89%
💯241.75%
💔211.53%
161.16%
😱161.16%
🤝130.945%
🫡100.727%
90.655%
🤯60.436%
👏40.291%
😢40.291%
🤔30.218%
💘20.145%
🤩20.145%
3 further kinds30.218%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 49 of the 55 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,375 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 13:39 UTC342 viewsread 2 September 2026
Poll

Придёте на разбор 1 сентября в ZOOM?

  1. — Да, приду в эфир50%
  2. — Да, но посмотрю в записи41%
  3. — Нет, в этот раз пропущу9%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Sept 2026, 13:38 UTC354 views6 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Мы тут пошушукались и поняли, что давненько вас всех не видели. А тут и повод появился — обсудить результаты 1 сентября. Расскажем, как прошёл праздник в Lacy Bird, а вы зададите вопросы, покажете свои цифры. В общем, обсудим всё, на что хватит времени 😄 Как вам идея? Голосуйте в опросе — придёте или не придёте?

5🔥1

2 Sept 2026, 13:38 UTC344 views1 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

😍1

1 Sept 2026, 16:40 UTC708 viewsread 2 September 2026
Poll

Как продажи?

  1. — Лучше, чем в прошлом году28%
  2. — Хуже, чем в прошлом году36%
  3. — Примерно так же24%
  4. — Ещё не считали15%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

1 Sept 2026, 16:34 UTC700 views20 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Считаете? Тогда мы идём к вам! Сегодняшний ажиотаж стих, и, мы надеемся, вы уже успели немного прийти в себя 😅 А теперь мы, как молодожёны после свадьбы, считаем конверты и пытаемся понять: получилось ли закрыть 1 сентября лучше, чем в прошлом году? Как вам результаты? Голосуйте в опросе 👇🏼

🔥106🫡2custom 54023452036232856102

1 Sept 2026, 10:59 UTC709 views27 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Как создать эффект хрома на цветах? Под нашим постом с трендовым серебром спросили, как сделаны капли на коробочках лотоса? Ответ пришёл к нам из реков соц. сетей 😄 Спойлер: понадобится клеевой пистолет и металлическая алюминиевая пудра Смотрите и ставьте ❤️, если тоже хотели бы попробовать!

12🔥82❤‍🔥2😢2custom 54023452036232856101

31 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC804 views26 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Заглядываем в цех Lacy Bird 👀 Холодильники забиты деньгами цветами, а значит, уже завтра мы надеемся опустошить их под ноль 😄 Флористы Lacy Bird собирают предзаказы, а завтра всё это превратится в сотни букетов для учителей Показываем, как выглядит наш холодильник и хотим увидеть ваш! Кидайте фото или видео в комментариях 👇🏻

8👍8🔥4custom 54023452036232856104🤝1😍1

29 Aug 2026, 16:38 UTC970 views24 reactionsread 2 September 2026

ИИ добрался до домашних заданий Спросили у Алины Апполоновой, руководительницы кураторского отдела Академии, как кураторы относятся к тому, что студенты используют ИИ во время обучения. Если коротко, цитируем Алину: «Мы в шоке» 😂 Потому что одно дело — использовать ИИ как помощника. А другое — когда куратор просит переделать букет, времени или желания собирать его заново нет, и студент решает немного схитрить: исп

12😱8🔥4

28 Aug 2026, 17:49 UTC≈1,040 viewsread 2 September 2026
Poll

Каким вообще будет это 1 сентября по продажам?

  1. — Лучше прошлого года17%
  2. — Примерно так же31%
  3. — Хуже36%
  4. — Я не хочу об этом думать25%

The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

28 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTC990 viewsread 2 September 2026
Poll

Что будут брать чаще всего?

  1. — Небольшие букеты47%
  2. — Монобукеты7%
  3. — Авторские композиции7%
  4. — «Что-нибудь до 1500»62%

The shares total 123%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

28 Aug 2026, 16:34 UTC≈1,020 views0 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Poll

Что страшнее 31 августа?

  1. — Не хватит цветка9%
  2. — Останется слишком много цветка53%
  3. — Не хватит рук22%
  4. — Всё сразу ❤️‍🔥21%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

28 Aug 2026, 16:33 UTC989 viewsread 2 September 2026

На старт, коллеги! 🌸 1 сентября уже не за горами, все на низком старте, остались лишь последние приготовления. Решили измерить среднюю температуру по больнице, чтобы потом сравнить ожидание и реальность. Поэтому ради чистоты эксперимента предлагаем всем флористам и владельцам цветочных поучаствовать в опросах ниже👇🏻

Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @lbacademy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Sept 2026, 13:39 UTCAnonymous Poll32 voters

Придёте на разбор 1 сентября в ZOOM?

  1. — Да, приду в эфир50%
  2. — Да, но посмотрю в записи41%
  3. — Нет, в этот раз пропущу9%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Sept 2026, 16:40 UTCAnonymous Poll255 voters

Как продажи?

  1. — Лучше, чем в прошлом году28%
  2. — Хуже, чем в прошлом году36%
  3. — Примерно так же24%
  4. — Ещё не считали15%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

28 Aug 2026, 17:49 UTCAnonymous Poll201 voters

Каким вообще будет это 1 сентября по продажам?

  1. — Лучше прошлого года17%
  2. — Примерно так же31%
  3. — Хуже36%
  4. — Я не хочу об этом думать25%

The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

28 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTCAnonymous Poll200 voters

Что будут брать чаще всего?

  1. — Небольшие букеты47%
  2. — Монобукеты7%
  3. — Авторские композиции7%
  4. — «Что-нибудь до 1500»62%

The shares total 123%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

28 Aug 2026, 16:34 UTCAnonymous Poll172 voters

Что страшнее 31 августа?

  1. — Не хватит цветка9%
  2. — Останется слишком много цветка53%
  3. — Не хватит рук22%
  4. — Всё сразу ❤️‍🔥21%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Учим флористике: Lacy Bird Academy” (@lbacademy), 12,753 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lbacademy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.