Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for [Перерыв на пирожные] SAKI [🥀] T3NM@

Channel

[Перерыв на пирожные] SAKI [🥀] T3NM@

@ldl_saki

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

41subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002229485774
TypeChannel
Username@ldl_saki
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ldl_saki

Growth

404140.511 August 2026 — 41 subscribers11 August 2026 — 41 subscribers31 August 2026 — 40 subscribers10 September 2026 — 41 subscribers11 August 202610 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 30 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40–41 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 04:1941+1
31 Aug 2026, 14:0640-1
11 Aug 2026, 16:0741no change
11 Aug 2026, 09:4641first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

54 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1425.9%
custom 53865292700235987841222.2%
custom 54363857486118004681222.2%
custom 5294125393702325323611.1%
custom 545873225729444324259.26%
🔥47.41%
❤‍🔥11.85%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 20:08 UTCviews —

Channel name was changed to «[Перерыв на пирожные] SAKI [🥀] T3NM@»

4 Aug 2026, 20:08 UTC8 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @LacrimeDiLuna_sekaiPhoto

ㅤ ㅤ ⃟#RestSupp — [🌟] ★ ═══════════════════════ — Тенма Саки нужен небольшой отдых от ведения дневника !! Просьба не беспокоить её до конца отдыха ➩ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤ ㅤㅤ ㅤㅤㅤ [ @ Saki ]

2

4 Aug 2026, 20:03 UTC11 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026

❌ 🌟📮📮📮📮🌟 ——————————— 〔🌟🌟〕➤ Saki Saki ! ❌ 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 #ᑭ𝐨𝐬𝐭 ————『🌟』———— 🥹[🎀] На днях я обнаружила у себя на столе пирожные и леденцы. По почерку сладостей понятно, что это из кондитерской Эму-чан! Правда кто их сюда доставил...? 🤩 Подозрения есть, но не буду делать выводы на основе доводов и предположений. Надо будет обязательно как-то заскочить к Эму-чан! 🍮🍮 ⭐️—————————————

custom 54363857486118004683custom 529412539370232532321custom 54587322572944432421

2 Aug 2026, 12:59 UTC13 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026

❌ 🌟📮📮📮📮🌟 ——————————— 〔🌟🌟〕➤ Saki Saki ! ❌ 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 #ᑭ𝐨𝐬𝐭 ————『🌟』———— 🥹[🎀] Я больше не буду гулять ночью одна. 🎹 ⭐️—————————————

custom 53865292700235987843custom 543638574861180046821❤‍🔥1

2 Aug 2026, 01:03 UTC18 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026

❌ ❗️📮📮📮📮❗️ ————————— 〔🌟〕➤ Saki Saki ! ❌ 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 #I𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐭 ———『🌟🥹🌟』——— 🥹[➡️] Ясно... в таком случае могу лишь пожелать удачи. Шираиши-сан достаточно... стойкая и гордая личность. Не даст себя в обиду. 🎹 —————————————🎁

custom 53865292700235987843custom 543638574861180046832

2 Aug 2026, 00:52 UTC15 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026

❌ ❗️📮📮📮📮❗️ ————————— 〔🌟〕➤ Saki Saki ! ❌ 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 #I𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐭 ———『🌟🥹🌟』——— 🥹[➡️] К Шираиши-сан...? Вы её убили в той игре, что ли?! 🎹 —————————————🎁

2custom 53865292700235987842custom 54363857486118004682

2 Aug 2026, 00:29 UTC15 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026

❌ ❗️📮📮📮📮❗️ ————————— 〔🌟〕➤ Saki Saki ! ❌ 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 #I𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐚𝐜𝐭 ———『🌟🥹🌟』——— ❌[〰️] «Последнее, чего я хотела этой ночью, так это обсуждать Мэверик. Воспоминания сами по себе приходят... 🎹» 🥹[➡️] Понимаешь, мне бы не очень хотелось обсуждать всю эту тему... я просто тоже до конца не дошла. 🎹 —————————————🎁

2custom 52941253937023253232custom 54587322572944432422

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ldl_saki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“[Перерыв на пирожные] SAKI [🥀] T3NM@” (@ldl_saki), 41 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ldl_saki.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.