Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Le FLE avec Lucie 🇫🇷

Channel

Le FLE avec Lucie 🇫🇷

@le_fle_avec_lucie

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,046subscribers

+35 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001335537242
TypeChannel
Username@le_fle_avec_lucie
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/le_fle_avec_lucie

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,0102,0682,0396 August 2026 — 2,011 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,010 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,013 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,011 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,018 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,054 subscribers23 August 2026 — 2,059 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,068 subscribers29 August 2026 — 2,061 subscribers1 September 2026 — 2,056 subscribers15 September 2026 — 2,048 subscribers19 September 2026 — 2,046 subscribers2,0466 August 202619 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 44 days, net +35. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,001–2,077 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 13:162,046-2
15 Sept 2026, 07:562,048-8
1 Sept 2026, 20:042,056-5
29 Aug 2026, 22:042,061-7
26 Aug 2026, 13:162,068+9
23 Aug 2026, 13:552,059+5
19 Aug 2026, 13:522,054+36
16 Aug 2026, 21:072,018+7
13 Aug 2026, 02:062,011-2
10 Aug 2026, 00:292,013+3
7 Aug 2026, 07:272,010-1
6 Aug 2026, 12:372,011first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5s
Average length
5s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

185 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤6334.1%
🎉3820.5%
🔥3217.3%
👍2614.1%
🍾105.41%
👏63.24%
🤩52.70%
custom 542928522277867551431.62%
🙏10.541%
🥰10.541%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 185 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @le_fle_avec_lucie. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 05:23 UTC115 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

А если после А2 я всё ещё не буду готова к В1, то что делать ? Такой вопрос мне задала ученица, и я подумала, что многие из вас могут испытывать похожую тревогу при «переходе» с одного уровня на другой. Именно поэтому я решила написать пост-ответ в канале❤️. Да, переход на новый уровень всегда немного пугает 💯. Может казаться, что ты ещё «недостаточно знаешь», что нужно выучить ещё 100+ слов, повторить все времена,…

❤4👍1🥰1

5 Aug 2026, 17:51 UTC176 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Maintenant interprétez vos résultats : 😊5/5 : Parfait ! Vous maîtrisez les nuances👏 😊 4/5 : Très bien, mais une petite révision s’impose🤓 😊3/5 ou moins : Ce n’est pas grave ! Relisez les explications du post tranquillement une fois de plus🤗

❤8🤩3🙏1

5 Aug 2026, 17:47 UTC173 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

5. Je réponds __ questions de mes élèves chaque semaine.

  1. aux85%
  2. des13%
  3. par les2%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Aug 2026, 17:45 UTC165 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

4. Elle a répondu __ une lettre pour confirmer sa participation.

  1. à56%
  2. de5%
  3. par39%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Aug 2026, 17:44 UTC146 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

3. Je réponds __ la qualité de mon accompagnement.

  1. à16%
  2. de78%
  3. par7%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Aug 2026, 17:42 UTC154 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

2. Il répond toujours __ ses courriels dans la journée.

  1. à82%
  2. de13%
  3. par5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤1

5 Aug 2026, 17:40 UTC151 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

1. Elle a répondu __ un sourire quand je lui ai parlé de notre marriage.

  1. à15%
  2. d'20%
  3. par65%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Aug 2026, 15:54 UTC199 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

❤️Quelle est la différence entre répondre à, répondre de, répondre par Un seul verbe ➡️ trois prépositions ➡️trois sens différents. Mais comment ne plus les confondre ? Voici un petit guide⬇️ 😊 Répondre à = répondre à une question, à une personne, à une demande 😊Équivalents russes : ответить на вопрос, ответить кому-то 😊Ex. : Je réponds à toutes les questions de mes participantes dans le chat de l’atelier. 😊Répon…

❤16👍3🔥3

3 Aug 2026, 06:06 UTC232 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

😁😊😊😊❤️😊 😊😊😊😊😊😊😊 Juillet a été un mois dense, entre l'anniversaire, mes nouveaux ateliers et nos réflexions linguistiques. Voici le récapitulatif des publications pour ne rien manquer⬇️ 😊La quatrième de couverture 😊Recommandation de trois films avec Audrey Tautou • « Je ne regarde pas les films français, c’est trop difficile pour moi. » (le post pour celles et ceux qui veulent dépasser cette peur) 😊Dictée sur le site…

❤4👍4🔥3

31 Jul 2026, 15:24 UTC280 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Hier, j’ai eu notre rendez‑vous en ligne avec les participantes du tarif GROUPE de l’atelier de lecture « Ensemble, c’est tout »🙂. Nous avons parlé des personnages et de leurs relations, nous avons échangé sur les thèmes qui traversent le roman (le talent, l'amitié, l’amour qui ne se dit pas toujours), nous avons partagé nos impressions sur le livre, son titre et sur le format de l’atelier lui‑même. C’était si viva…

👍3👏2🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @le_fle_avec_lucie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Aug 2026, 17:47 UTCAnonymous Quiz60 voters

5. Je réponds __ questions de mes élèves chaque semaine.

  1. aux85%
  2. des13%
  3. par les2%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Aug 2026, 17:45 UTCAnonymous Quiz57 voters

4. Elle a répondu __ une lettre pour confirmer sa participation.

  1. à56%
  2. de5%
  3. par39%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Aug 2026, 17:44 UTCAnonymous Quiz58 voters

3. Je réponds __ la qualité de mon accompagnement.

  1. à16%
  2. de78%
  3. par7%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Aug 2026, 17:42 UTCAnonymous Quiz56 voters

2. Il répond toujours __ ses courriels dans la journée.

  1. à82%
  2. de13%
  3. par5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Aug 2026, 17:40 UTCAnonymous Quiz55 voters

1. Elle a répondu __ un sourire quand je lui ai parlé de notre marriage.

  1. à15%
  2. d'20%
  3. par65%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Французский язык / Francais
@le_francais_french · 43,689
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Le FLE avec Lucie 🇫🇷” (@le_fle_avec_lucie), 2,046 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/le_fle_avec_lucie.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.