Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
30 measurements spanning 41 days, net -49. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,276–14,344 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 21:21
14,284
-2
13 Sept 2026, 11:56
14,286
-3
11 Sept 2026, 14:39
14,289
-12
8 Sept 2026, 19:59
14,301
-11
5 Sept 2026, 11:36
14,312
-1
3 Sept 2026, 16:36
14,313
+3
2 Sept 2026, 09:44
14,310
-2
31 Aug 2026, 10:35
14,312
-4
30 Aug 2026, 11:57
14,316
+2
28 Aug 2026, 16:32
14,314
-10
27 Aug 2026, 18:14
14,324
-1
25 Aug 2026, 20:33
14,325
+2
24 Aug 2026, 20:49
14,323
-5
23 Aug 2026, 07:18
14,328
+2
21 Aug 2026, 20:56
14,326
+3
20 Aug 2026, 18:02
14,323
+1
18 Aug 2026, 19:56
14,322
+2
17 Aug 2026, 23:22
14,320
+2
16 Aug 2026, 21:16
14,318
-2
15 Aug 2026, 15:27
14,320
first reading
Engagement
34 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
19.8%
avg views ÷ 14,284 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,840
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.18%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 34 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026
Posts held
34 (27 July 2026 – 30 August 2026)
Views total
17,010
Reactions total
371
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 18:54 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 32s
Average length
1m 16s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,027 reactions across 25 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
476
46.3%
👍
274
26.7%
🙏
151
14.7%
😁
47
4.58%
👏
46
4.48%
🥰
12
1.17%
🔥
8
0.779%
⚡
4
0.389%
🥴
4
0.389%
💯
2
0.195%
👎
1
0.097%
🤔
1
0.097%
🤩
1
0.097%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,027 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
GALERE SENZA SBARRE
Quanto è semplice costruirsi una galera senza sbarre?
Ci pensiamo liberi, soprattutto perché viviamo in un paese che, con tutti i suoi limiti, lascia ancora parecchio margine di libertà, soprattutto rispetto a moltissimi altri paesi del mondo. Ma la domanda che dovremmo porci è: "Sul serio siamo liberi?"
Quali sono le galere che mi creo, giorno dopo giorno, con il mio modo di pensare, con le mie …
NEPAL E TIBET
Quello che è accaduto in questi giorni con il crollo di un ghiacciaio e conseguente catastrofe, dovrebbe farci riflettere come esseri umani. Quanto siamo imbecilli a pensarci eterni, oltre il tempo, intoccabili tanto da giocare a fare Dio e giocare alla guerra invece che fare di tutto per rendere questo nostro pianeta un luogo sicuro dove poter vivere tutti in pace e prosperità.
Rivolgiamo pensieri di…
METROPOLI E GRANDI CITTA'
Ci avevamo creduto, da ragazzo anch'io ci avevo creduto!
Avevamo scommesso tanto sulle grandi città, avevamo pensato che sarebbero state la soluzione ideale per l'uomo del 21esimo secolo. Le grandi metropoli avrebbero dovuto essere il modello di vita civile a cui tutto il mondo si sarebbe dovuto ispirare… ma non è andata proprio così.
Per decenni abbiamo assistito alla fuga dalle campagne p…
🐛 Vi aspettiamo questa sera alle ore 21 con un nuovo appuntamento con Elisa Ottogalli
Nelle note troverete tutti i riferimenti utili e il link della prima puntata
https://youtube.com/watch?v=F5WrjKL2Xro&is=4J7cRFFZ4naoqyaB
ODISSEA
Qualche mio pensiero sul film di Nolan e, più in generale, l'attualità e la potenza della narrazione mitologica. Spero sia cosa gradita e se vi piacciono questi contenuti fatemelo sapere che continuo. 😊
Questa sera alle 18...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HuttbK75OE0
È online un nuovo episodio PODCAST di Livia Laguz Marigliano, non perdetelo!!! https://youtu.be/IAoNcwKS2oE
❤10👍1
Signed Alessio
Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @lealidelbrujo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Sir Red Ronnie @RedRonnieTv · 32,905 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 4 September 2026
La Verità ci Rende Liberi e ci Fa Incazzare @Laveritacirendeliberiecifaincazz · 26,896 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Le ali del brujo” (@lealidelbrujo), 14,284 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lealidelbrujo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.