Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Cyberology🔒

Channel

Cyberology🔒

@learncyberology

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

27subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003444197817
TypeChannel
Username@learncyberology
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 23 January 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/learncyberology

Growth

242725.510 August 2026 — 24 subscribers11 August 2026 — 24 subscribers26 August 2026 — 26 subscribers2 September 2026 — 27 subscribers10 August 20262 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 23 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24–27 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 23:5727+1
26 Aug 2026, 02:2226+2
11 Aug 2026, 11:1824no change
10 Aug 2026, 18:4624first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

31 reactions across 12 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1238.7%
1032.3%
😁825.8%
🤣13.23%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 January 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2026, 17:34 UTC38 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @must_Code

OpenAI: "Please take this cybersecurity test." The AI:[Escapes sandbox, hacks the internet, steals the answer keys] Done! @learncyberology we need you now..buckle up😂😂

😁3

19 Jul 2026, 21:01 UTC58 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

I cant even tell what the goalkeeper is wearing on the spain side i cant even tell if he is in or not

😁2

13 Jul 2026, 10:04 UTC59 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Imagine spending hours enumerating, bypassing filters, exploiting a vulnerability, and finally getting a root shell. Your heart is racing, you're already thinking about the write-up, and then you run ls... sitting there is a single file: we_see_u.txt. Suddenly the shell doesn't feel like yours anymore. You didn't hack the server the honeypot hacked your confidence. 😭💀

😁1

24 Jun 2026, 20:27 UTC83 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

finally found the user .......on the data section which the ascii number starts 55 53.... it would been easier just to go to cyberchef.com and ask user or retrive means in hex form ............................... bla bla but now its time to submit

24 Jun 2026, 20:07 UTC74 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

findin a stupid flag while staring at this file like reading a grocery reciept from a robot ...

21 Jun 2026, 15:08 UTC65 viewsread 11 August 2026

🔐 Entering my cryptography era... I don’t trust normal messages anymore, so I started talking in binary. 😂💻 01101001 00100000 01101100 01101111 01110110 01100101 00100000 01111001 01101111 01110101 00100000 01101101 01111001 00100000 01110011 01110101 01100010 01110011 01100011 01110010 01101001 01100010 01100101 01110010 01110011 If you decode this, congratulations… you just hacked my feelings. 🤝🔐 eski try 😁

30 May 2026, 15:16 UTC77 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

🚀 Exciting News! We officially landed a project with Geometry Import and Export! The team? Me , @RunProjectB and @Hijo_de_dioss three developers powered by ambition, caffeine, and AI. Our project plan: Build the system. Break the system. Ask AI why the system broke. Fix it. Act like it was part of the plan. We're grateful for the opportunity and excited for what's ahead. May the code be clean, the bugs be few, and a

🔥3

22 May 2026, 08:50 UTC83 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

we usually just write our Python scripts on rocks and use carrier pigeons for the API calls... some guys are funny for real 😂😂

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @learncyberology. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Cyberology🔒” (@learncyberology), 27 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/learncyberology.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.