Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Где тексты, Лебовски?

Channel

Где тексты, Лебовски?

@lebowskiposts

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

18,772subscribers

-122 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001394784842
TypeChannel
Username@lebowskiposts
Created1 September 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/lebowskiposts

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

18,77218,89718,834.56 August 2026 — 18,894 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,895 subscribers8 August 2026 — 18,890 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,892 subscribers10 August 2026 — 18,894 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,895 subscribers13 August 2026 — 18,897 subscribers14 August 2026 — 18,885 subscribers17 August 2026 — 18,879 subscribers18 August 2026 — 18,875 subscribers19 August 2026 — 18,872 subscribers20 August 2026 — 18,869 subscribers21 August 2026 — 18,870 subscribers22 August 2026 — 18,866 subscribers24 August 2026 — 18,854 subscribers25 August 2026 — 18,848 subscribers26 August 2026 — 18,843 subscribers27 August 2026 — 18,838 subscribers28 August 2026 — 18,835 subscribers30 August 2026 — 18,824 subscribers31 August 2026 — 18,818 subscribers2 September 2026 — 18,815 subscribers5 September 2026 — 18,811 subscribers8 September 2026 — 18,799 subscribers11 September 2026 — 18,793 subscribers13 September 2026 — 18,787 subscribers14 September 2026 — 18,779 subscribers16 September 2026 — 18,778 subscribers18 September 2026 — 18,772 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
29 measurements spanning 44 days, net -122. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,753–18,916 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 18:3918,772-6
16 Sept 2026, 08:5818,778-1
14 Sept 2026, 12:5718,779-8
13 Sept 2026, 00:3718,787-6
11 Sept 2026, 02:4218,793-6
8 Sept 2026, 07:3918,799-12
5 Sept 2026, 02:5918,811-4
2 Sept 2026, 02:0318,815-3
31 Aug 2026, 23:1718,818-6
30 Aug 2026, 20:3318,824-11
28 Aug 2026, 18:3318,835-3
27 Aug 2026, 19:4418,838-5
26 Aug 2026, 20:5418,843-5
25 Aug 2026, 17:4518,848-6
24 Aug 2026, 17:2718,854-12
22 Aug 2026, 22:4218,866-4
21 Aug 2026, 12:2918,870+1
20 Aug 2026, 12:4218,869-3
19 Aug 2026, 15:3618,872-3
18 Aug 2026, 12:1618,875first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.2%
avg views ÷ 18,772 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,480
1 post measured
Reaction rate
1.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026
Posts held25 (2 July 2026 – 30 August 2026)
Views total2,480
Reactions total26
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 02:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,781 reactions across 25 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,06259.6%
🔥23713.3%
❤‍🔥23113.0%
👍884.94%
💯613.43%
🌭201.12%
⚡191.07%
🍌160.898%
👏110.618%
😐80.449%
😢60.337%
🥴60.337%
🤣50.281%
👌40.225%
😁20.112%
🤔20.112%
🤨20.112%
🥰10.056%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,781 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
23
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 25 we hold a reading for · 36%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lebowskiposts. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 25 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 July 2026 to 30 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Aug 2026, 13:26 UTC≈2,480 views26 reactionsread 3 September 2026

#BigLebowskiMarathon2026 — 34. Comet Если б вы знали как я люблю творчество Сэма Эсмейла, вы бы заплакали. Мистер Робот, по-моему, один из величайших сериалов в истории и Leave The World Behind мне тоже очень понравился, так что к просмотру "Кометы" я подходил с огромнейшим интересом. И... В целом мне понравилось. Джастин Лонг как всегда прекрасен, Эмми Россум — тем более, композиция кадра — мое почтение, да и вооб…

❤‍🔥21❤3👍1🥰1

23 Aug 2026, 14:56 UTC≈4,270 views17 reactionsread 3 September 2026

#BigLebowskiMarathon2026 — 33. Stuart: A Life Backwards Сегодня пост будет коротким, чтобы я не говнился на объективно хорошую историю в фильме, который недостаточно ее раскрывает. С одной стороны, это важная история про потерянного человека, который никогда бы не был услышан, если бы не счастливая встреча с писателем. Сам Стюарт — глубоко трагичный персонаж, и каждый новый кусочек пазла его жизни расстраивал сильн…

❤17

16 Aug 2026, 16:05 UTC≈5,730 views33 reactionsread 3 September 2026

#BigLebowskiMarathon2026 — 32. No Hard Feelings На самом деле очень сложно оценивать этот фильм, потому что с одной стороны это довольно кринжовая история, которая от и до построена на формулах, стереотипах и прочих неприятных вещах из комедий начала нулевых, но... Все равно какая-то добрая и приятная в своей основе. Плюс посмотреть на Дженнифер Лоуренс всегда приятно, даже когда она генерит какой-то среднесмешной …

❤24💯9

12 Aug 2026, 22:55 UTC≈6,950 views81 reactions2 Starsread 3 September 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

❤55🔥10❤‍🔥7⚡4😐3👍2

12 Aug 2026, 22:55 UTC≈6,360 views78 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Что-то у меня слишком мало сил, чтобы придумывать подводку к посту, поэтому просто ловите последнюю, девятую серию второго сезона Людей-Икс'97. Скачать субтитры можно ниже, а посмотреть сразу со вшитыми субтитрами — через бусти.

❤51❤‍🔥12👏11😐3👍1

9 Aug 2026, 16:46 UTC≈7,890 views39 reactionsread 3 September 2026

#BigLebowskiMarathon2026 — 31. The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford Долгий и тягучий, как и свое название, но все еще очень хороший фильм. И в этот раз даже не буду ворчать по этому поводу — без этого хронометража не получилось бы такого объемного исследования мужского эго, одержимости и зависти, депрессии и саморазрушения. Ну и как это все сыграно - ух. Роберт Форд прекрасен в своей отврати…

❤33👌4🤔2

5 Aug 2026, 20:06 UTC≈7,380 views59 reactions3 Starsread 3 September 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

❤48🔥6👍3❤‍🔥2

5 Aug 2026, 20:06 UTC≈6,960 views51 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Пришло время восьмой серии второго сезона "Людей-Икс'97". А вместе со временем и русские субтитры. Скачать их можно ниже, а посмотреть сразу со вшитыми субтитрами — через бусти.

❤44🔥4👍2❤‍🔥1

2 Aug 2026, 11:44 UTC≈8,870 views53 reactionsread 3 September 2026

#BigLebowskiMarathon2026 — 30. Kate Ждал Джона Уика с Мэри Элизабет Уинстед и получил Джона Уика с Мэри Элизабет Уинстед. Сюжет в фильме практически отсутствует, а тот, что есть — предсказуемые формулы. Актерская игра не впечатляет. Япония в фильме состоит из западных стереотипов, и их же подкрепляет. Моменты между экшеном сильно затянуты, а попытки фильма рассмешить зрителя постоянно проваливаются. НО. Мэри Элиз…

❤37❤‍🔥7👍6🔥3

29 Jul 2026, 17:27 UTC≈7,570 views68 reactions2 Starsread 3 September 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

❤49❤‍🔥15⚡3👍1

29 Jul 2026, 17:27 UTC≈6,940 views76 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Сегодня русские субтитры к Людям-Икс летят к вам чуточку раньше, но в то же время, к сожалению, менее отполированными. А все потому, что я хочу сходить на Человека-Паука, и времени на нормальную редактуру нет. Поэтому не удивляйтесь, если опечаток будет чуть больше обычного — завтра пересмотрю и обновлю субтитры. А пока ловите седьмую серию второго сезона. Сами субтитры можно скачать ниже, а посмотреть сразу со вши…

❤63😢6🔥4👍3

26 Jul 2026, 12:35 UTC≈8,200 views34 reactionsread 3 September 2026

#BigLebowskiMarathon2026 — 29. Free Fire Еще один фильм в жанре "снято специально для меня". Интересная ситуация с кучей конфликтов, потрясающие актеры, играющие замечательных персонажей и очень много креативных в своей жестокости, тупости и уровне юмора ситуаций. Все полтора часа смотрел на экран, не отрываясь ни на секунду. Да, фильм не идеален, и ко многому можно прикопаться, но в этот раз даже не хочется. Очен…

❤‍🔥21👍9❤2😁2

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @lebowskiposts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Qewbite
@Qewbite · 72,642
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
🦶💥 Переходник 💥🦶
@PokvmOf · 8,332
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 5 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Где тексты, Лебовски?” (@lebowskiposts), 18,772 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lebowskiposts.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.