Channel
@lechit_kalechit
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
656subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001197779093 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @lechit_kalechit |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/lechit_kalechit |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 04:21 | 656 | +3 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 17:17 | 653 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 17:38 | 652 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:37 | 654 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:07 | 651 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:46 | 650 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:10 | 650 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 16 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
409 reactions across 13 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 208 | 50.9% | |
| 🔥 | 57 | 13.9% | |
| 🤣 | 26 | 6.36% | |
| 😁 | 19 | 4.65% | |
| 👍 | 18 | 4.40% | |
| 💘 | 15 | 3.67% | |
| 😱 | 14 | 3.42% | |
| 😨 | 10 | 2.44% | |
| 🥰 | 10 | 2.44% | |
| 👏 | 9 | 2.20% | |
| 🤪 | 9 | 2.20% | |
| 🤩 | 8 | 1.96% | |
| 😢 | 5 | 1.22% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.244% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 409 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 16 April 2026 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Начнем с того, что я только что зашла в метро 😵Утром была аттестация ординаторов, об этом позже расскажу 🥹Далее день увенчался развитием ОНМК у моего пациента, которого мы экстренно переводили Но все трудности померкли, когда две прекрасные девушки, Владлена и Алина, которые проходят студенческую практику в НМИЦ ТПМ, подарили мне шоколадку 🥹🥹🥹 За то, что получалось брать их в обходы 🥹 Как настоящий зуммер, готов…
❤26💘9🥰2
За май-июнь у меня было около 6 выступлений, причем форматы были очень разные 😳Пока что у меня не получается создавать презентации «для второго использования» — слишком разные темы, поэтому каждую презентацию приходится делать с нуля Был и эксперимент создания презентации буквально за ночь, причем получилось, вроде как, очень даже не плохо — это было выступление в Уфе, вот тут можно глянуть ❤️ 🐸Что парадоксально —…
❤19🔥13👍4👏2🙏1
Ну вы поняли) Не чокаясь😎
❤20🔥8🥰4😁3
Подъехал РЕАЛЬНО блогерский контент 😁 Понимаете, да? • распаковка • микрофон • на заднем фоне — вспышка Все максимально серьезно 😌
❤25🤩8💘6🥰2
Ребята, по нашей схеме пишем комментарии — а тема реально интересная мы поговорим о том, понадобится ли в будущем эндоваскулярная хирургия как метод лечения атеросклеротического поражения коронарного и периферического русла Учитывая, что мой начальник — эндоваскулярный хирурги, представьте, по какой грани я хожу...))
❤11👍3🥰2
📢 сегодня вечером! 💬 Поговорим о мире липидов, новейших исследованиях в области профилактики атеросклероза — и все это вместе с Ахмеджановым Надиром Мигдатовичем — ведущим научным сотрудником отдела профилактики метаболических нарушений ФГБУ «НМИЦ терапии и профилактической медицины» МЗ РФ Подключаетесь и задавайте вопросы! 😎 https://internist.ru/events/detail/941718/ 📍 18:00 на «Интернисте»
❤10👍3🔥2
Сегодня доктор; с кем я вела пациента, проверял мою выписку Слава богу, что проверял… (Доктор, я знаю, что вы это читаете😂 спасибо вам за терпение)
🤣26😁16🤪9👏1
Прошу прощения, а где легкие? 🫁
😱14😨10😢5❤3
К вопросу о том, сколько прекрасных людей помогли мне и были рядом🫰 Обнимаю каждого
❤18
Страна должна знать своих героев! 🔅 📍 Олимпиада «Золотой стетоскоп» прошла масштабно, охватив оба дня конгресса «Человек и Лекарство». И особую благодарность хочется выразить команде ординаторов, которые стояли за кулисами, готовили ребятам задания, проводили квест и Олимпиаду Вот они, слева направо😎 💟«Симптомы» подготовила Абаева Кристина, собрав самые яркие особенности заболеваний 💟Вопросы по истории медицины …
❤11🔥8
Мы это сделали Мы провели Олимпиаду На этом все
❤26🔥14👏3
Video message, posted without a caption
❤20🔥8👏3
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @lechit_kalechit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“анЬ | Лечить нельзя калечить!” (@lechit_kalechit), 656 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lechit_kalechit.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.