Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Последний Крестоносец

Channel

Последний Крестоносец

@lederniercroise

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,890subscribers

+57 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001722835687
TypeChannel
Username@lederniercroise
Created24 August 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/lederniercroise

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,8201,8951,857.56 August 2026 — 1,833 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,833 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,830 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,829 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,828 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,829 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,826 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,825 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,820 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,823 subscribers6 September 2026 — 1,881 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,889 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,895 subscribers19 September 2026 — 1,890 subscribers1,8906 August 202619 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 44 days, net +57. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,809–1,906 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 08:161,890-5
14 Sept 2026, 23:161,895+6
11 Sept 2026, 11:581,889+8
6 Sept 2026, 22:371,881+58
2 Sept 2026, 00:181,823+3
30 Aug 2026, 06:551,820-5
26 Aug 2026, 22:081,825-1
23 Aug 2026, 12:251,826-3
19 Aug 2026, 12:541,829+1
16 Aug 2026, 15:531,828-1
12 Aug 2026, 21:541,829-1
9 Aug 2026, 11:331,830-3
6 Aug 2026, 11:321,833no change
6 Aug 2026, 11:031,833first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 12 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 23 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

235 reactions across 23 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥12452.8%
👍2410.2%
💯208.51%
114.68%
👌114.68%
😁114.68%
🤔83.40%
🌚72.98%
❤‍🔥41.70%
👏41.70%
🤡31.28%
🤪31.28%
20.851%
👀10.426%
👎10.426%
😱10.426%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 235 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 20:57 UTC163 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Kompot_KnightsPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥6❤‍🔥2

6 Aug 2026, 20:57 UTC170 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

100 гигабайт книг по истории на жёстком диске...

🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 15:18 UTC229 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Они трогательно стерли мой коммент. Нет чтобы подискутировать о сагах и Титмаре Мерзебургском. 😂

😁11🤡1

6 Aug 2026, 15:13 UTC221 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В церковные кругах это не очень любят. Когда один князь заказал двух других князей, пусть и братьев, это жестоко, но понятно. Но, когда один канонизированный святой заказал двух других возникает некая психологическая проблема. 😂

🌚7👍3

6 Aug 2026, 14:25 UTC236 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Все-таки админ очень нехороший человек. Сегодня день памяти князей Бориса и Глеба. И он не удержался и откомментировал в одном месте, где весь текст был основан на ПВЛ и житии, что глубоко почитавший их Ярослав, видимо, их сам и заказал. А Святополк Окаянный, судя по всему, в этот момент был в Польше у тестя, собирал войска для дальнейшей борьбы. Вот такой админ вредный.

👌11👏3👀1🤡1

6 Aug 2026, 10:05 UTC244 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Тут я ознакомился с разбором Клима Александровича Жукова учебника по военной истории от Мединского и компании от 2019 года. И должен сказать, что разбор хороший - вопросов нет. А вот учебник, видимо, просто жуткого качества. Разбор легко ищется. Я воспользовался у коллеги в Вк ссылкой на Дзен.

🤔6🔥2

5 Aug 2026, 16:18 UTC255 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Интересные отсылки у Фулька Нерры на Псевдо-Дионисия Ареопагита? Подробнее узнаете, когда напишу пост. Пока готовлю. 😊

🔥5

4 Aug 2026, 15:04 UTC265 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

#книги@lederniercroise На русском вышла классическая работа Жоржа Дюби "Рыцарь, женщина и священник". 1981 года. Работа посвящена институту брака в Средневековой Франции. Издано АСТ, что пугает. Я её частично читал на французском, ибо на полке есть. Рекомендуется к прочтению.

👍10🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 14:57 UTC227 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @vma_journalPhoto

В начале последнего летнего месяца рады представить вам новый номер журнала! Гуляйте, загорайте, читайте интересное! 9–11 | Мария Андреевна Зенкова Intro DISCIPLINA I 13–40 | Станислав Григорьевич Мереминский Конструирование образа античности в историописании «Возрождения XII века» («Abbreviationes chronicarum» Ральфа де Дицето) 41–65 | Павел Назимович Новрузов, Мария Андреевна Волконская He was þe wiseste man: «

2👏1🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 08:07 UTC248 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Тут у нас вчера был яффский десант Ричарда Львиное Сердце 3 августа 1192 года. Но там надо разобраться подробно. На статью.

🔥11

1 Aug 2026, 10:10 UTC351 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @studiabellorum

Друзья и коллеги, добрый день! Представляем вашему вниманию запись конференции «Превратности войны: провидение, удача и случай в военном деле в Средние века и раннее Новое время», состоявшейся 19-20 июня 2025 г. в ИВИ РАН. Записи всех сессий конференции можно найти в этом плейлисте: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLeFHwqJyJD_U&si=NFGrjULE4IIHM9ub Ссылка на ютуб-канал семинара: https://youtube.com/@studiabelloru

2🔥1

30 Jul 2026, 07:24 UTC360 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @iusadhistoriam

Рабочее, записи ===== Дело, конечно, уже давнее, но ведь грех не поделиться. Я достаточно регулярно появляюсь на радио, в программе "История. Изъявительное наклонение", которую ведёт мой друг, журналист и историк Алексей Штейнбух. Программу я искренне рекомендую всем - там всегда бывают интересные люди, которые умеют и любят рассказывать о разных исторических сюжетах. Вот здесь и здесь, например, лежат две части на

🔥3👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @lederniercroise. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Последний Крестоносец” (@lederniercroise), 1,890 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lederniercroise.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.