Channel
@leephillipscinema
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
150subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002583909058 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @leephillipscinema |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/leephillipscinema |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 19:16 | 150 | +1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 14:41 | 149 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:13 | 150 | +2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:47 | 148 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:15 | 145 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:51 | 145 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
58 reactions across 7 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 25 | 43.1% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 19.0% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 6.90% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 5.17% | |
| 💘 | 3 | 5.17% | |
| 🤪 | 3 | 5.17% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 3.45% | |
| 🤡 | 2 | 3.45% | |
| custom 5211158745941288186 | 1 | 1.72% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 1.72% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 1.72% | |
| 💅 | 1 | 1.72% | |
| 🦄 | 1 | 1.72% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 58 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Не так давно у нас в ФПРК завершился практикум по драматургии. Мы провели с проектами-победителями нашего конкурса индивидуальные созвоны, на которых тьюторы работали со сценпланами каждого фильма и давали полезные советы. Тьюторы у нас в этом году вообще лучшие из лучших: Татьяна Соболева, Владимир Головнёв, Ольга Аверкиева, Мария Безенкова, Михаил Железников, Юлия Киселёва. Слушать, как разбирают чужие проекты, …
❤8🔥1
Ну и к слову о том, почему бывает сложно смотреть кино с большим звездным составом 😁
😁4❤🔥1
«Одиссея» Новый трёхчасовой эпический блокбастер от Кристофера Нолана. В особом представлении не нуждается. Моя оценка: 6 из 10 Как уже понятно из названия, фильм основан на античной мифологии. Анализировать сюжет здесь не имеет особого смысла. Миф о великом путешествии сам по себе — учебник по драматургии, из которого выросли и геройский путь, и современный роуд-муви. Поэтому формула была выведена ещё до Нолана. …
❤4👍3🔥1🤡1custom 52111587459412881861
«Непокой» В прокате взрослый артхаусный мультфильм режиссёра Леонида Шмелькова, того самого чувака, который делает рилсы про синего пса Андрея. Моя оценка: 2 из 10 В анимации меня всегда восхищает особое внимание к деталям, которое в других видах кино встречается реже. Несмотря на кажущуюся неряшливость, в «Непокое» детали проработаны абсолютно прекрасно. Здесь и бесконечные мухи в кадре, и голубиная какашка на кр…
❤6😢2🤡1
Недавно ездила одним днём в Санкт-Петербург на фестиваль Кинолес. В красивом месте, на берегу Финского залива, в рамках деловой программы мы проводили конференцию на тему «Возможности дебютантов: опыт интеграции в киноиндустрию». Рассказывала о том, каким образом ФПРК помогает дебютантам по всей России. Вообще дискуссия получилась довольно интересной. Пришли к выводу, что у дебютанта есть много разных возможностей …
🔥8💘3🏆1💅1🦄1
«Призрак в клетке» С 30 июля в прокате индонезийский хоррор с Берлинского фестиваля. Вы вообще когда-либо смотрели индонезийское кино? Вот и я, кажется, нет. Поэтому любопытство берёт верх! Моя оценка: 6 из 10 В «Очень страшном кино 6» шутят о том, что в современных хоррорах стало слишком много метафор. Это да. А я хочу добавить, что хорроры перестали быть моножанром. Теперь к ним всё чаще примешивается комедия, к…
❤2🔥1
«Очень страшное кино 6» Уже целый месяц в прокате продолжение культовой франшизы, абсурдной комедии, высмеивающей фильмы ужасов. Моя оценка: 6 из 10 Изначально я не собиралась смотреть эту часть, так как, признаться честно, не любитель предыдущих. Что довольно странно, потому что я люблю хорроры и люблю смеяться над их клише. Когда эти фильмы только выходили, я была слишком маленькой, чтобы их понять, и видела лиш…
❤5🤪3
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @leephillipscinema. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мои киносны” (@leephillipscinema), 150 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/leephillipscinema.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.