Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Плейлист

Channel

Плейлист

@legistuz

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7subscribers

-791 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001259650456
TypeChannel
Username@legistuz
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/legistuz

Growth

7800403.57 August 2026 — 798 subscribers7 August 2026 — 798 subscribers7 August 2026 — 800 subscribers15 August 2026 — 789 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10 subscribers12 September 2026 — 7 subscribers7 August 202612 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 36 days, net -791. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 12:197-3
21 Aug 2026, 12:4710-779
15 Aug 2026, 05:38789-11
7 Aug 2026, 18:24800+2
7 Aug 2026, 05:00798no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:59798first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

202 reactions across 20 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6029.7%
👍4220.8%
😁2813.9%
🔥199.41%
🕊188.91%
104.95%
💔73.47%
😢52.48%
💯31.49%
🤔31.49%
👎20.99%
👏10.495%
😎10.495%
😱10.495%
🤨10.495%
🥱10.495%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 202 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 12:54 UTC149 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Malaksan, yo bashar, yo huri g‘ilmonsan, bilib bo‘lmas, Bu lutfu, bu nazokat birla sendan ayrilib bo‘lmas. @legistuz

6🕊1😎1

28 Jul 2026, 19:28 UTC425 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Voice message

💊 Qachon “273”, qaysi holatda “276” bo‘ladi? 1,5x tezlikda eshitish tavsiya qilinadi. 👉 @LEGISTCLUB'da har kuni sud qarorlari xuddi shunday tahlil qilib boriladi. Qo‘shilib oling. @legistuz

🔥6

27 Jul 2026, 13:30 UTC411 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

HMQO xodimlari va davlat xizmatchilari ichida barvaqt vafot etish holati haqida so‘nggi bir oy mobaynidagi 3-xabarni o‘qishim. @legistuz

🕊1😱1

25 Jul 2026, 09:40 UTC482 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

O‘lchovlar buzilgan Puli yo‘q erkak, afsuski, hech kimga yoqmaydi. Bu fakt. Oilada yo‘qchilik hukm surib turgan vaziyatda mehr-muhabbat va baxtli hayot haqida gap borishi mumkin emas. Lekin, muammo boshqa nuqtada. Bu yerdagi o‘ta yomon signal — oila qurishdagi buzuq qarashlarda. Faqat pul asosiy mezon qilib olinishi norm deb qabul qilinyapti. Shunda oiladagi baxtli muhit, sadoqat pulga bog‘langan bo‘ladimi? Erkak

12🔥3👍1👎1👏1🕊1

24 Jul 2026, 14:08 UTC366 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

💔72🤨1🥱1

24 Jul 2026, 10:45 UTC371 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Poyingda yotgan tosh balki haykaling bo‘lar (c). @legistuz

6🔥3💯1🕊1

24 Jul 2026, 06:06 UTC354 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ona tili fanidan tayyorlanuvchi abituriyentlar ulanib olishingiz mumkin. Ustoz sohaning mutaxassisi. 👉 @Esse70_Ona_tili_Testlar

🔥61🕊1

22 Jul 2026, 15:57 UTC429 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Hech bir dalil sud uchun oldindan belgilangan kuchga ega emas. @legistuz

👍6

20 Jul 2026, 17:27 UTC962 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Faqat yuristlar, talabalar uchun! Har kuni sud qarorlari tahlili (ovozli + muhim haylaytlar) ulashib boriladi: 👉 @legistclub

83👍2🕊1

16 Jul 2026, 13:09 UTC709 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Bitta yaxshi fikr o‘qib qoldim: Bilim, ko‘nikmalarni gorizontaliga emas, vertikaliga chuqurroq o‘rganish foyda beradi. Yaʼni bu yerda hamma sohani sayoz bilishdan ko‘ra bir sohani mukammal bilgan samaraliroq degan g‘oya bor. @legistuz

👍104🕊2

9 Jul 2026, 18:32 UTC815 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Bir necha yil tergovda ishlab chiqqan hamkasbimiz gapi esga tushdi. O‘zi jinoyat ishlarida kuchli advokat, ammo fuqarolik ishlarida yutqazaverardi. Bir kuni fuqarolik (iqtisodiy) sudlarda bundan buyon qatnashmasligini aytib qoldilar. Sababini so‘rasam “yoki men fuqarolikni tushunmayapman, yoki sudyalar meni tushunmayapti” deb kulishgandik. Huquq olami ham rang ba rang-da. @legistuz

😁93🕊1

9 Jul 2026, 17:37 UTC827 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Boshqa ishlardan farqli o‘laroq jinoyat ishlarida isbotlanishi lozim bo‘lgan holatlar hajmi, xronometraji katta. Deylik, shartnomaviy nizo bilan bog‘liq iqtisodiy ishda isbotlash predmeti hujjatlarning to‘g‘ri rasmiylashtirilganligi, ularning haqiqiyligi, majburiyat bajarilganligi, qonunga muvofiqligi va shunga aloqador masalar bilan cheklangan. Sudda nizo kelib chiqishiga sabab bo‘lgan muayyan fakt(lar)ni isbotlab

3👍1💯1🔥1🕊1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @legistuz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Плейлист” (@legistuz), 7 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/legistuz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.