@the_ewe_guy

Channel
THE TIPSTER π₯
@legit_source_channel
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
3,477subscribers
-181 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 3,162β10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001783155817 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @legit_source_channel |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/legit_source_channel |
Topic
Education β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 18:55 | 3,477 | -33 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 22:01 | 3,510 | -36 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 09:42 | 3,546 | -20 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:37 | 3,566 | -16 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:34 | 3,582 | -9 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:34 | 3,591 | -13 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:27 | 3,604 | -16 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:55 | 3,620 | -10 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:04 | 3,630 | -22 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 05:15 | 3,652 | -6 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 10:31 | 3,658 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 25 May 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
15 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 8 | 53.3% | |
| π | 6 | 40.0% | |
| π‘ | 1 | 6.67% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 15 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 25 May 2026 to 2 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Text me now if you want to pay and get the questions now
β€2
*NB* : Revise on Abraham Maslow theory of needs, it's likely to meet some questions here especially in the objectives. Thanks
π4β€2
*NB* : Every year, 8 objective questions come from this topic and two theory question. This topic is unique that it is compulsory to ask questions on the topic as an examiner of Social Studies. So students letβs take it serious. Thank u for reading
Photo, posted without a caption
Social studies trail questions
Core Mathematics is tricky, letβs prepare seriously. πβοΈ Last year, almost 50% of the candidates who wrote Core Mathematics failed. Ask yourself why? Many didnβt pay for trusted sources and relied on anything they saw on social media. At the end of the day, they were disappointed. Some also depended on AI-generated solutions and many got their papers cancelled because the answers were wrong or suspicious. This yeβ¦
β€2
https://t.me/waveobot?start=_tgr_G8QWcaM3ZjU8
Are you online?
π2
Answers are posted here https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb7pRg16buMBg6MucE2K https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb7pRg16buMBg6MucE2K Join now
β€1π‘1
INTER SCIENCE (Essay) actual papers. WASSCE2026π¬π βShare To Inform Othersβ- You saw it here first π
Join this channel and be free https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb7pRg16buMBg6MucE2K https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb7pRg16buMBg6MucE2K
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @legit_source_channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegramβs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
@engineroomofficiall Β· 25,690
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 30 here β alongside 29 others β read 13 September 2026
@wassce_bece2026 Β· 102,231
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 55 here β alongside 54 others β read 15 August 2026
@exams_leaks_center Β· 22,856
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 46 here β alongside 45 others β read 19 September 2026
@eminentlinkwassce Β· 49,199
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 63 here β alongside 62 others β read 25 August 2026
@wassce_bece_updatesss Β· 77,014
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 62 here β alongside 61 others β read 17 August 2026
@wassce_bece_update Β· 131,554
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 59 here β alongside 58 others β read 13 August 2026
@legitwassce Β· 47,069
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 66 here β alongside 65 others β read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 7 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βTHE TIPSTER π₯β (@legit_source_channel), 3,477 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/legit_source_channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.